CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48Social and Intergroup PsychologyElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CHAPTER 20 The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes

Nosek, Brian, Banaji, Mahzarin R., Jost, John T.·2009·Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification
DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ideologies that underlie concepts of ethnocentrism, authoritarianism, system justification, social dominance, and morality shape minds in sufficiently deep ways to bring about (a) congruence between implicit and explicit preferences, and (b) a consistently greater preference for socially advantaged groups among political conservatives than liberals on both explicit and implicit measures. Data from large web samples and representative samples from the American National Election Studies (ANES) provide support for these and two additional results: (a) liberals show greater mean dissociation between explicit and implicit attitudes than conservatives, reporting more favorable attitudes toward the underprivileged groups than they demonstrate on implicit measures; and (b) over time, conservatives’ racial preferences converge on those of liberals, suggesting that where liberals are today, conservatives will be tomorrow.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.020

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Adorno,, 1950, The authoritarian personality.
  2. Altemeyer,, 1996, The authoritarian specter.
  3. The, 2005, The 1948–2004 ANES Cumulative Data File [data set].
  4. Bar-Anan,, The sorting paired features task: A measure of association strengths., Experimental Psychology.
  5. Bargh,, 1997, The automaticity of everyday life., Advances in Social Cognition
  6. Bishop,, 2005, The illusion of public opinion.
  7. Conrey,, 2005, Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The Quad model of implicit task performance., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.469 · DOI
  8. Converse,, 1964, Ideology and discontent
  9. Cunningham,, 2004, Implicit and explicit ethnocentrism: Revisiting the ideologies of prejudice., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,, 10.1177/0146167204264654 · DOI
  10. Devine,, 2002, The regulation of explicit and implicit racial bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.835 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fazio,, 1986, On the automatic activation of attitudes., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Greenwald,, 1995, Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes., Psychological Review,, 10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Greenwald,, 1998, Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Greenwald,, Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  15. Haidt,, 2007, When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize., Social Justice Research,, 10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hewstone,, 2002, Intergroup bias., Annual Review of Psychology,, 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Huntington,, 1957, Conservatism as an ideology., American Political Science Review,, 10.2307/1952202 · DOI
  18. Jost,, 2006, The end of the end of ideology., American Psychologist,, 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651 · DOI
  19. Jost,, 1994, The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness., British Journal of Social Psychology,, 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x · DOI
  20. Jost,, 2004, A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo., Political Psychology,, 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Jost,, 2003, Political conservatism as motivated social cognition., Psychological Bulletin,, 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Jost,, 2008, Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology., Perspectives on Psychological Science,, 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x · DOI
  23. Jost,, 2000, Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,, 10.1006/jesp.1999.1403 · DOI
  24. Logan,, 1988, Toward an instance theory of automization., Psychological Review,, 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492 · DOI · Paper page
  25. McCann,, 1997, Threatening times, “strong” presidential popular vote winners, and the victory margin, 1824–1964., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.160 · DOI
  26. Moskowitz,, 1999, Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.167 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Napier,, 2008, Why are conservatives happier than liberals?, Psychological Science,, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x · DOI
  28. Nosek,, 2005, Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,, 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.565 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Nosek,, 2007, Implicit-explicit relations., Current Directions in Psychological Science,, 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00477.x · DOI
  30. Nosek,, 2001, The go/no-go association task., Social Cognition,, 10.1521/soco.19.6.625.20886 · DOI
  31. Nosek,, 2006, Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior
  32. Nosek,, 2007, A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs., Experimental Psychology,, 10.1027/1618-3169.54.1.14 · DOI
  33. Nosek,, 2007, Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes., European Review of Social Psychology,, 10.1080/10463280701489053 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Payne,, 2005, An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Rothermund,, 2004, Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating salience from associations., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,, 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.139 · DOI
  36. Sales,, 1972, Economic threat as a determinant of conversion rates in authoritarian and nonauthoritarian churches., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/h0033157 · DOI
  37. Sidanius,, 1999, Social dominance., 10.1017/CBO9781139175043 · DOI
  38. Skitka,, 2002, Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.470 · DOI
  39. Tajfel,, 1978, Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations
  40. Tajfel,, 1986, The psychology of intergroup relations
  41. Ullrich,, 2007, Terrorism salience increases system justification: Experimental evidence., Social Justice Research,, 10.1007/s11211-007-0035-y · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 48

Metadata

Authors
Nosek, B., Banaji, M. R., & Jost, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York
Published
2009-08-01
Pages
480-506
DOI
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.020
OpenAlex
W2499055853
Cited by
48
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
22.82
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
intergroup attitudes, ideology, ethnocentrism, authoritarianism, system justification, social dominance, morality, explicit and implicit attitudes, partisanship, liberals and conservatives, racial attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review