The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Moral Machines
Abstract
The human‐built environment is increasingly being populated by artificial agents that, through artificial intelligence (AI), are capable of acting autonomously. The software controlling these autonomous systems is, to‐date, “ethically blind” in the sense that the decision‐making capabilities of such systems does not involve any explicit moral reasoning. The title Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong refers to the need for these increasingly autonomous systems (robots and software bots) to become capable of factoring ethical and moral considerations into their decision making. The new field of inquiry directed at the development of artificial moral agents is referred to by a number of names including machine morality, machine ethics, roboethics, or artificial morality. Engineers exploring design strategies for systems sensitive to moral considerations in their choices and actions will need to determine what role ethical theory should play in defining control architectures for such systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several expert committees have been created to this end, such as the High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence appointed by the European Commission, the Expert Group on AI in Society of the OECD, and the Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence of the UK's House of Lords.153”
From Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 719
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-fm
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-033
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-027
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-007
4.5 Die Stufen der moralischen Orientierung
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-024 · Cited by 1
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-026
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-016
1.5 Können Roboter Personen sein?
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-008
2.3 »Kognitive Wende« in der Psychologie«
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-011
2.5 Linds Zwei-Aspekt-Theorie: Moral ist lehrbar
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-013
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-003
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-019
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-002
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-025
2.6 Warum brauchen Roboter moralische Kompetenz?
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-014
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-021
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-toc
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-009
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-001
4.4 Dual-Aspekt-Dual-Ebenen Modell
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-023 · Cited by 1
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-029
6.2 Mein Freund, der Roboter – eine Unterrichtseinheit für die Grundschule
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-030
4.3 Der funktionalistische Ansatz: Moralischen Kompetenz als Komponenten-Modell
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-022 · Cited by 1
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-010
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-005
1.3 Roboter versus KI: Was ist der Unterschied?
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-006
2.4 Die »Renaissance des Gefühls«
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-012
Schmiljun, A., & Schmiljun, I. M. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839467206-031 · Cited by 1
Zhang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60904-6_24
Decker, M. (2024) · J.B. Metzler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-05991-8_35
Embodiment and Humanoid Robotics
Mergner, T., Funk, M., & Lippi, V. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-19606-6_23
WHERE: Humans, Technology, and Humane Technology
Walther, C. C. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67823-3_2 · Cited by 4
The Societal Dynamics Unravelling the Impact of Social Media
Chandratreya, A. (2024) · Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7914-1.ch002
Issues and Concerns for Human–Robot Interaction
Barfield, W., Weng, Y.-H., & Pagallo, U. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009386708.013
I, Robot? Legal Personality for Robots and the Android Fallacy
Chesterman, S. A. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009386708.014
A logical approach in autonomous vehicle ethics: the skeptical reasoning in dilemma
Yoo, D.-H. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00616-1
Murphy, J. W., & Largacha-Martínez, C. (2024) · Humanism in business series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74256-9_7
Intelligent Assistants Strengthening Personhood
Hole, K. (2025) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2024.3402244
Resetting Machine Ethics: Rationalism, Hypocrisy, Disagreement, and the Skillful-Expert Model
Yeung, F. S. H., & Song, F. (2024) · Philosophy of engineering and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-77857-5_10
Dennis, L. A., & Fisher, M. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82039-7_1
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, DATA PROTECTION AND TRANSPARENCY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GDPR AND CCPAPreprint
Munir, B., yasin, A., Irfan, M., et al. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5216910
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Backing Up Human Insight: A Powerful Partnership
Kim, H., & Lee, H. S. (2025) · MechEcology · doi:10.23104/me.e7
Arshad, D. N. J. (2025) · Synergy International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies · doi:10.63960/sijmds-2025-2253
Die psychologischen Grenzen der Künstlichen Intelligenz
Hoffmann, O. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-70966-5_9
Zhao, J., & Liu, X. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-7188-5_2
Ahmed, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5361436
Identification and Sorting of Objects by Color using Robotic Arm
Vatsal, P. H. G., Abhiram, V., Reddy, S., et al. (2025) · International Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology · doi:10.1109/rait65068.2025.11088895
“In the context of Industry 4.0, robots play an important role in the industrial manufacturing process by performing manual tasks with precision and efficiency, reducing processing time and enhancing accuracy [1], [2].”
InfluentialThe Driver of an Autonomous Vehicle as a Recipient of Digital Mobility Services
Krasuski, A. (2025) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98901-8_6
Integrating Ethics of Technology into a Serious Game: The Case of Tethics
Perperidis, G., Spilios, I., Simos, M., et al. (2025) · Open Philosophy · doi:10.1515/opphil-2025-0078
Ian McEwan’ın Benim Gibi Makineler Romanında Robot Hakları İkilemi
Özgün, Ö., & Arargüç, M. F. (2025) · Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi · doi:10.53568/yyusbed.1663079
WO: Menschen, Technologie und humane Technologie
Walther, C. C. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-95463-4_2
A Case for Embedding Moral Reasoning in Artificial Agents Engaged in Conflict
Kremer-Herman, N., & Milkowski, M. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) · doi:10.1109/istas65609.2025.11269637
“In response, the design of AI agents which engage in moral reasoning has become a burgeoning field of inquiry with some authors providing best practices for agent design [24] and others providing approaches to the writing of ethical reasoning algorithms [25].”
The Emergence of Artificial Humanoids
Gordon, J.-S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14034-0_2
Chapitre 3. El ser humano como protagonista y responsable del medio ambiente
Europaeus, & Montano, P. J. (2025) · Journal international de bioéthique et d éthique des sciences · doi:10.54695/jibes.361.0026
Ramos, F. (2026) · Justicia &Derecho · doi:10.32457/rjyd.v9i1.3216 · Cited by 1
Autonomous Like Us? Machinic Copies and Human Models in the Age of AI
Anzalone, M. (2026) · Integrated science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14537-6_1
The human, the god, and the algorithm: the moral dilemmas of superintelligence
Antoci, A. (2026) · Studia Universitatis Moldaviae Științe Economice și ale Comunicării · doi:10.59295/sum11(6)2025_15
Jhamb, A. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5530-6.ch006
Learning the value systems of agents with preference-based and inverse reinforcement learning
Holgado-Sánchez, A., Billhardt, H., Fernández, A., & Ossowskí, S. (2026) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-026-09732-0 · Cited by 1
Xinshen and the ethics of belief in human-AI relations: a Mozi-inspired ethical reinterpretation
Pang, W. Y. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05370-3
Agencia artificial y responsabilidad delegada
Martín Bórquez, C. (2026) · Mutatis Mutandis Revista Internacional de Filosofía · doi:10.69967/07194773.v13i.609
Research on the moral status of social robots based on relational continuity
Liu, M., & Wang, Y. (2026) · South African Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/02580136.2026.2638052
“Third, it completely disavows anthropocentrism and acknowledges silicon-based robots as legitimate value-bearing agents in an ethical niche (Latour 2005; Wallach and Allen 2009).”
Divyadharshini., A. (2026) · Journal of Inventive and Scientific Research Studies · doi:10.66194/gvncjisrsv4i1-020
aiHumanoid v11.9: a large concept model for autonomous ethical reasoning in clinical AI
Danter, W. R. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01060-z
Berreby, F. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/05e81ceaz2b8bz46daz9c91z0847209710bb
Evans, K. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/77343456z9d12z4417z8715z2fce53011344 · Cited by 3
La construction du droit de la santé numérique
Bastian, M. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/42887e92z8cc8z4dbez9e01z8d059f647b88
A preference-based approach to machine ethics for automated planning
Jedwabny, M. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/cdbc9d15zedccz471az9398zed83a64b5068
Robot Ethics: Assessing Risk from the Perspective of Autonomy
Schlegl, P. J., Pareto, J., & Carme Torras, A. (2026) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13063-1_9
Modeling automated legal and ethical compliance for trustworthy AI
Taheri, Y. (2024) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/5971a37cz548bz4673z8186z5e4e8ed8cf1b
Alexa, Make Me a Sandwich: The Function of Gender in the Burgeoning AI Industry (2016–2025)
Simonds, M. (2026) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1013403
de Calabre, M.-D.-N. R. (2016) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/31daa67cz114cz45cezab28z988e9ab3cc07
The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their DesignersPreprint
Chen, B. M., & Xie, X. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6598358
Choice all the way down: AI, central planning, and the Hayekian Counterarguments
Schulz, A. W. (2026) · The Review of Austrian Economics · doi:10.1007/s11138-026-00731-8
Cecchini, D. (2026) · Advances in neuroethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-20117-1_10
Meta-ethics and AI: exploring the novel meta-ethical questions in the era of AI
Lu, S. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01134-y
“…specific moral rules and principles, as imple - mented in processes such as the ‘top-down’ training—where the designer deliberately establishes a goal for the machine from the beginning, grounded in the moral principles they intend to operationalise [122 ]—does not count as moral intentionality.”
InfluentialWhy Machines Cannot Instantiate Virtue Ethics
Levin, S. B. (2026) · Philosophical studies in contemporary culture · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08566-5_14
The Psychological Limits of Artificial Intelligence
Hoffmann, O. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-73147-5_9
Rubeis, G. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14301-3_6
Maschinenethik und autonome Systeme
Keuthen, T. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-51418-1_7
الذكاء الاصطناعي، وعزو المسؤولية، والتسويغ العلاقي لمطلب تفسير الأفعال والقرارات الآلية
عثمان, ط. (2026) · الفكر الإسلامي المعاصر (إسلامية المعرفة سابقا) · doi:10.35632/citj.v31i111.17273
سؤال القيم في زمن الذكاء الاصطناعي
فريدي, س. (2026) · الفكر الإسلامي المعاصر (إسلامية المعرفة سابقا) · doi:10.35632/citj.v31i111.17253
Redefining Ethics: The Impact of Advanced Moral Norms in AMAs and the Risk of Moral Alienation
Heinrichs, J.-H. (2026) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10073-3_12
Why police robots will not become human-like: social interaction, machine ethics, and limits of AI
Szocik, K., & Smith, B. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03117-3
“Wallach and Allen argue for a graded approach to moral machines, focusing on embedding constraints and capacities rather than assuming full moral agency (Wallach & Allen 2009).”
InfluentialBaxi, P., & Baxi, R. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01175-3
41Inclusive Leadership and the Representational Issues of Human-Like Robots
Mamak, K. (2025) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111662145-003
Pascua, D. S. (2026) · doi:10.1109/icaiset66439.2026.11541693
“This position is also consistent with reflections on technology-driven deskilling, moral agency, and the importance of structured knowledge synthesis in emerging interdisciplinary fields [45] – [47].”
Responding to the normativity problem in machine ethics through the Power of the Other
Guo, Y. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03131-5
“In contrast, another line of research treats moral norms as external to the subject and emphasizes their implementation within artificial systems (Brandom 1994; Floridi 2013; Wallach & Allen 2009).”
Operationalizing Pluralist AI Governance with the Integrated Axiology–MCDA Framework
Sun, F., Isovic, D., & Dodig-Crnković, G. (2026) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies11030093
Saraswat, S., Jindal, A., Saraswat, P., Srivastava, A., Sahay, N., Mishra, S., & Singh, V. (2025) · International Conference on Computational Engineering, Sensing Technology and Management (ICCETM) · doi:10.1109/iccetm66557.2025.11557825
XAI2Brain: A Perspective on Mechanistic Interpretability for Brain–AI Alignment
Jiang, R., Zhou, Y., Wang, B., Angelov, P. P., & Ni, Q. (2026) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make8060167
“The discourse on moral and ethical implications underscores the need for continuous exploration and dialogue [68,77,78].”
A Multi-Objective Optimization Strategy Based on the IEEE Std 7000-2021 Ethical Standard
Chen, K., Hu, Z. F., Chai, S., et al. (2026) · Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) · doi:10.1109/ccdc69976.2026.11560007
Hierarchical Invariant Governance for Adaptive AgentsPreprint
Long, B. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6888638
Daisy, Daisy, I’m Crazy. HAL-9000 – wrogi asystent AI?
Szczerbakiewicz, R. T. (2026) · Forum Poetyki · doi:10.14746/fp.2026.43.1
The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their Designers
Chen, B. M., & Xie, X. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812297
Dijital Etik: Yapay Zekâ ve Akıllı Sistem İhlalleri Üzerine Değer Temelli Bir Analiz
Aslan, A. (2026) · Düşünce ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.55796/dusuncevetoplum.1955088
Liberal and Limitist Approaches to the Development of Socially Beneficial Artificial Intelligence
Liu, Y., & Bai, Y. (2026) · Philosophy of engineering and technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-8023-1_17
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallach, W., & Allen, C.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2009-02-01
- OpenAlex
- W4247462173
- Cited by
- 711
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 22.38
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Keywords
- machine ethics, artificial morality, robot ethics, autonomous systems, ethical decision-making, control architecture, moral theory, robots, bots
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review