The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Moral Machines
Abstract
The human‐built environment is increasingly being populated by artificial agents that, through artificial intelligence (AI), are capable of acting autonomously. The software controlling these autonomous systems is, to‐date, “ethically blind” in the sense that the decision‐making capabilities of such systems does not involve any explicit moral reasoning. The title Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong refers to the need for these increasingly autonomous systems (robots and software bots) to become capable of factoring ethical and moral considerations into their decision making. The new field of inquiry directed at the development of artificial moral agents is referred to by a number of names including machine morality, machine ethics, roboethics, or artificial morality. Engineers exploring design strategies for systems sensitive to moral considerations in their choices and actions will need to determine what role ethical theory should play in defining control architectures for such systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several expert committees have been created to this end, such as the High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence appointed by the European Commission, the Expert Group on AI in Society of the OECD, and the Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence of the UK's House of Lords.153”
From Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–719 of 719
Amorphization of moral norms: rethinking responsibility and moral agency in AI-mediated environments
Petrova, Y. O. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01246-5
Perspective Chapter: Judging – The Human and the Machine
Lavelle, S. (2026) · Artificial intelligence · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1015712
Responsible Robotics: An Interdisciplinary Approach through Design Thinking
Weng, Y.-H. (2026) · Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan · doi:10.7210/jrsj.44.556
Ohira, H. (2026) · Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan · doi:10.7210/jrsj.44.577
Toward an internal moral purpose like normative governance function in artificial agency
Keleş, S. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01268-z
Witayakiattilerd, W., Pansuwan, A., Panichkitkosolkul, W., et al. (2026) · Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1995080226617042
Morally Capable AIs? Anthropological Considerations with a View to the Human Self-Relation
Glatzel, M. C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-23721-7_9
Should Care Robots Answer? Rethinking Moral Answerability Beyond Humans
Kropf, M. (2026) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.70150
“Robot behavior is structured by programmed priorities and constraints that differentiate between acceptable and unacceptable actions (Wallach and Allen 2009, 79).”
Ethical Awareness Narrative Agents: A Novel Framework for Ethical Reasoning in AI Systems
Oshadare, A. M., Chimezie, C., Ejike, U., Oziri, E. E., Fatuase, D., Umo, F., Bantale, O., & Fagbohun, O. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Reality (ICIR) · doi:10.1109/icir70631.2026.11628108
“Three criteria qualify an agent as an AMA: interactivity, autonomy, and adaptability [7].”
Moral Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Reflections on Its Possibility and Implications
Biswas, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22368-5_18
A Trust Governance Architecture for Ethical-Aware Autonomous Systems in Smart Ecosystems
Kušniráková, D., Memon, M. A., Autili, M., & Rossi, B. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C) · doi:10.1109/icsa-c68850.2026.00045
“Prior work discusses foundational principles for ethical system design, including Moor’s four levels of ethical agency [24], [37], [39], [47], [50], and various ethical theories including deontology [4], conse-quentialism [44], However, the diversity and uncertainty of ethical theories make it…”
The Problem of Moral Agency in the Context of Accounting and Auditing Automation
Chernaya, S. N. (2026) · Auditor · doi:10.12737/1998-0701-2026-12-8-16-22
Hodges, C., Verbrugge, K., & Antoun, S. M. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-32732-1_42
AI for inclusion: a powerful idea – under which conditions?!
Baumann, L., Heitplatz, V. N., Pelka, B., Dirks, S., & Gerken, J. (2026) · Journal of Enabling Technologies · doi:10.1108/jet-01-2026-0007
Artificial Morality and Machine Ethics
Misselhorn, C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-2821-8_16
Human interaction with artificial intelligence as a factor in professional loneliness
Sorokoumova, E. А., Кочнева, А. Ю., & Борисовна, П. Е. (2026) · Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology · doi:10.17759/jmfp.2026150304
Owning the Intangible: Can Classical Property Theories Survive the Digital Turn?Preprint
Kraft, V. R. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10962530/v1
L'acte administratif algorithmique
Stepanov, A. (2026) · doi:10.70675/adc05be3za62ez4b4fz81e7zabf744e60dbf
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallach, W., & Allen, C.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2009-02-01
- OpenAlex
- W4247462173
- Cited by
- 711
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 22.38
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Keywords
- machine ethics, artificial morality, robot ethics, autonomous systems, ethical decision-making, control architecture, moral theory, robots, bots
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review