Cited by 52Epigenetics and DNA MethylationStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Use of correct and incorrect methods of accounting for age in studies of epigenetic accelerated aging: Implications and recommendations for best practices

Open access
Krieger, Nancy, Chen, Jarvis T, Testa, Christian, Diez Roux, Ana, Tilling, Kate, Watkins, Sarah, Simpkin, Andrew J, Suderman, Matthew, Davey Smith, George, De Vivo, Immaculata, Waterman, Pamela D, Relton, Caroline·2023·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Motivated by our conduct of a literature review on social exposures and accelerated aging as measured by a growing number of epigenetic “clocks” (which estimate age via DNA methylation (DNAm) patterns), we report on 3 different approaches in the epidemiologic literature—1 incorrect and 2 correct—on the treatment of age in these and other studies using other common exposures (i.e., body mass index and alcohol consumption). Among the 50 empirical articles reviewed, the majority (n = 29; 58%) used the incorrect method of analyzing accelerated aging detrended for age as the outcome and did not control for age as a covariate. By contrast, only 42% used correct methods, which are either to analyze accelerated aging detrended for age as the outcome and control for age as a covariate (n = 16; 32%) or to analyze raw DNAm age as the outcome and control for age as a covariate (n = 5; 10%). In accord with prior demonstrations of bias introduced by use of the incorrect approach, we provide simulation analyses and additional empirical analyses to illustrate how the incorrect method can lead to bias towards the null, and we discuss implications for extant research and recommendations for best practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwad025

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chronological age was utilized as a covariate to ensure comparability across clocks and avoid spurious associations from age confounding.

    “Following Krieger et al. (2023)’s recommendations, chronological age was utilized as a covariate to ensure comparability across clocks and avoid spurious associations from age confounding.”

    From Grandparent Caregiving and Epigenetic Aging among Midlife and Older Adults in the United States (2026) · cites this paper as Krieger et al. (2023)

    The Discussion recommends controlling for chronological age as a covariate to address age confounding and produce more accurate association estimates. It says this enables more robust comparisons across studies, but does not establish comparability across different clocks, as the claim states. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Morris, 1957, Uses of Epidemiology
  2. Kuh, 2004, A Life Course Approach to Chronic Disease Epidemiology, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198578154.001.0001 · DOI
  3. Yashi, 2014, Aging and Health: A Systems Biology Perspective, 10.1159/isbn.978-3-318-02730-3 · DOI
  4. Estes, 2019, Aging A–Z: Concepts Toward Emancipatory Gerontology, 10.4324/9780429055188 · DOI
  5. Krieger, 2021, Ecosocial Theory, Embodied Truths, and the People’s Health, 10.1093/oso/9780197510728.001.0001 · DOI
  6. Maroni, 2019, Tracking the epigenetic clock across the human life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort data, J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci., 74, 57, 10.1093/gerona/gly060 · DOI
  7. Ryan, 2021, “Epigenetic clocks”: theory and applications in human biology, Am J Hum Biol., 33, 10.1002/ajhb.23488 · DOI
  8. Noroozi, 2021, DNA methylation-based age clocks: from age prediction to age reversion, Ageing Res Rev., 68, 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101314 · DOI
  9. Frisch, 1933, Partial time regressions as compared with individual trends, Econometrica., 1, 387, 10.2307/1907330 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Lovell, 1963, Seasonal adjustment of economic time series and multiple regression analysis, J Am Stat Assoc., 58, 993, 10.1080/01621459.1963.10480682 · DOI
  11. Rosenbaum, 1984, Difficulties with regression analyses of age-adjusted rates, Biometrics., 40, 437, 10.2307/2531396 · DOI
  12. Wooldridge, 2016, Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach
  13. Angrist, 2008, Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion, 10.2307/j.ctvcm4j72 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Demissie, 2011, Bias due to two-stage residual-outcome regression analysis in genetic association studies, Genet Epidemiol., 35, 592, 10.1002/gepi.20607 · DOI
  15. Che, 2012, Loss of power in two-stage residual-outcome regression analysis in genetic association studies, Genet Epidemiol., 36, 890, 10.1002/gepi.21671 · DOI
  16. VanderWeele, 2015, Explanation in Causal Inference: Methods for Mediation and Interaction
  17. VanderWeele, 2019, Principles of confounder selection, Eur J Epidemiol., 34, 211, 10.1007/s10654-019-00494-6 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Schmitz, 2022, The socioeconomic gradient in epigenetic ageing clocks: evidence from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and the Health and Retirement Study, Epigenetics., 17, 589, 10.1080/15592294.2021.1939479 · DOI
  19. Boyd, 2013, Cohort profile: the ‘Children of the 90s’—the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, Int J Epidemiol., 42, 111, 10.1093/ije/dys064 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Fraser, 2013, Cohort profile: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: ALSPAC mothers cohort, Int J Epidemiol., 42, 97, 10.1093/ije/dys066 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Bespalov, 2019, Be positive about negatives—recommendations for the publication of negative (or null) results, Eur Neuropsychopharmacol., 29, 1312, 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.10.007 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Wang, 2020, Associations of annual ambient PM2.5 components with DNAm PhenoAge acceleration in elderly men: the Normative Aging Study, Environ Pollut., 258, 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113690 · DOI
  23. Zindler, 2020, Simulating ComBat: how batch correction can lead to the systematic introduction of false positive results in DNA methylation microarray studies, BMC Bioinformatics., 21, 271, 10.1186/s12859-020-03559-6 · DOI
  24. Sugden, 2020, Patterns of reliability: assessing the reproducibility and integrity of DNA methylation measurement, Patterns (N Y)., 1
  25. Simons, 2021, The effects of social adversity, discrimination, and health risk behaviors on the accelerated aging of African Americans: further support for the weathering hypothesis, Soc Sci Med., 282, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113169 · DOI
  26. Quach, 2017, Epigenetic clock analysis of diet, exercise, education, and lifestyle factors, Aging (Albany NY)., 9, 419, 10.18632/aging.101168 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krieger, N., Chen, J. T., Testa, C., Diez Roux, A., Tilling, K., Watkins, S., Simpkin, A. J., Suderman, M., Davey Smith, G., De Vivo, I., Waterman, P. D., & Relton, C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Corresponding author
Krieger, Nancy
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2023-01-30
Volume
192
Issue
5
Pages
800-811
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W4318754780
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Harvard University
  • Drexel University
  • Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  • National University of Ireland
  • Wellcome Trust (217065/Z/19/Z, 217065)
  • University of Bristol (217065/Z/19/Z, MC_UU_12013/8, BB/I025263/1, MC_UU_12013/2)
  • University of Galway
  • National Institutes of Health (217065/Z/19/Z)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council (217065/Z/19/Z, MC_UU_12013_2, MC_UU_12013, MC UU 12013/8, 217065, MC_UU_00032/4, MC_UU_00032/1, MC_PC_15018, MC_UU_00011/1, MC_PC_19009)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I025263/1, BB/I025751/1, BB/I025751/1 and BB/I025263/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/N000498/1)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R01MD014304)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
accelerated aging, epigenetic clocks, DNA methylation, age as covariate, body mass index, alcohol consumption, social exposure
MeSH terms
Aging, Humans, Body Mass Index, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Epigenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review