Cited by 163Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Transitions to mild cognitive impairments, dementia, and death: findings from the Nun Study

Open access
Tyas, S. L., Salazar, J. C., Snowdon, D. A., Desrosiers, M. F., Riley, K. P., Mendiondo, M. S., Kryscio, R. J.·2007·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The potential of early interventions for dementia has increased interest in cognitive impairments less severe than dementia. However, predictors of the trajectory from intact cognition to dementia have not yet been clearly identified. The purpose of this study was to determine whether known risk factors for dementia increased the risk of mild cognitive impairments or progression from mild cognitive impairments to dementia. A polytomous logistic regression model was used, with parameters governing transitions within transient states (intact cognition, mild cognitive impairments, global impairment) estimated separately from parameters governing the transition from transient to absorbing state (dementia or death). Analyses were based on seven annual examinations (1991-2002) of 470 Nun Study participants aged > or = 75 years at baseline and living in the United States. Odds of developing dementia increased with age primarily for those with low educational levels. In these women, presence of an apolipoprotein E gene *E4 allele increased the odds more than fourfold by age 95 years. Age, education, and the apolipoprotein E gene were all significantly associated with mild cognitive impairments. Only age, however, was associated with progression to dementia. Thus, risk factors for dementia may operate primarily by predisposing individuals to develop mild cognitive impairments; subsequent progression to dementia then depends on only time and competing mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwm085

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Nun Study found discordance between cognition and pathology.

    “For example, the Nun Study has shown discordance of cognition with pathology as well as the important effects of education, diet, linguistic ability, and childhood positive emotion on cognitive function in late life (Iacono, et al., 2009,Tyas, et al., 2007).”
  • The Nun Study found that education, diet, linguistic ability, and childhood positive emotion affect late-life cognitive function.

    “For example, the Nun Study has shown discordance of cognition with pathology as well as the important effects of education, diet, linguistic ability, and childhood positive emotion on cognitive function in late life (Iacono, et al., 2009,Tyas, et al., 2007).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Gauthier S, Reisberg B, Zaudig M, et al. Mild cognitive im- pairment. Lancet 2006;367:1262-70.
  2. Snowdon DA, Kemper SJ, Mortimer JA, et al. Linguistic ability in early life and cognitive function and Alzheimer's disease in late life. JAMA 1996;275:528-32.
  3. Tyas et al. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165:1231-1238
  4. Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang KY, et al. Analysis of longitu- dinal data. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tyas, S. L., Salazar, J. C., Snowdon, D. A., Desrosiers, M. F., Riley, K. P., Mendiondo, M. S., & Kryscio, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2007-04-02
Volume
165
Issue
11
Pages
1231-1238
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2138319363
Cited by
163
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert J. Kleberg, Jr. and Helen C. Kleberg Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5k04ag000553-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG009862, P50AG005144, P50AG-05144, K04 AG00553, R01AG09862)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, dementia, dementia progression, cognitive decline trajectories, apolipoprotein E ε4 allele, educational attainment, aging, mortality, older women, dementia risk factors, Nun Study
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Markov Chains, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Likelihood Functions, Logistic Models, Age Distribution, Disease Progression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review