Cited by 120Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Stress increases attentional bias for alcohol cues in social drinkers who drink to cope

Field, Matt, Powell, Hannah·2007·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the effects of stress on alcohol craving and attentional bias for alcohol-related cues in a group of heavy social drinkers. METHOD: Forty-four heavy social drinkers were exposed to either a laboratory stressor task or a control manipulation before completing a questionnaire measure of alcohol craving and a visual probe task which measured attentional bias for alcohol-related cues. Participants were subdivided into those with high and low levels of coping motives for drinking. RESULTS: Compared to a control manipulation, the laboratory stressor task produced increases in alcohol craving (P < 0.01). The laboratory stressor task also produced a significant attentional bias for alcohol-related cues, but only among participants who had high levels of coping motives (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Findings are broadly consistent with contemporary negative reinforcement models of substance abuse, and with models of subjective craving and attentional biases for substance-related cues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/agm064

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In heavy alcohol consumers, a laboratory psychosocial stressor increased attentional bias for alcohol-related cues and enhanced subjective alcohol cravings.

    “In heavy alcohol consumers, for example, a laboratory psychosocial stressor increased attentional bias for alcohol-related cues and enhanced subjective alcohol cravings (Field & Powell, 2007).”

    From Toward objective characterizations of suicide risk: A narrative review of laboratory-based cognitive and behavioral tasks (2023) · cites this paper as Field & Powell, 2007

    The Discussion (p. 5) reports that a laboratory stressor increased subjective alcohol craving among heavy social drinkers. It also increased attentional bias for alcohol cues, but only among participants who reported drinking to cope as a prominent motive. The citing sentence omits that restriction on the attentional-bias finding. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The effect of psychosocial stress on alcohol attentional bias was specific to those who used alcohol as a coping mechanism.

    “Interestingly, the effect was specific to those who used alcohol as a coping mechanism (Field & Powell, 2007).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Field, M. (2006) Attentional biases in drug abuse and addiction: cognitive mechanisms, causes, consequences, and implications. In Cognition and Addiction , Munafo, M. R., Albery, I. P. eds. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  2. Metzger, R. L. (1976) A reliability and validity study of the state trait anxiety inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology 32 , 276-278.
  3. Sobell, L. C. and Sobell, M. B., (1992) Timeline followback: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biological Methods , Litten, R. Z., Allen, J. eds, pp 41-72, Humana Press: New Jersey.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Field, M., & Powell, H.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Field, Matt
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2007-08-31
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
560-566
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W2169231405
Cited by
120
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
stress, alcohol craving, attentional bias, alcohol cues, social drinkers, coping motives, heavy drinking, laboratory stressor, negative reinforcement
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholic Beverages, Attention, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Stress, Psychological, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review