Cited by 40Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Education and ValidationPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the AUDIT and CAGE Questionnaires in Tanzanian Swahili for a Traumatic Brain Injury Population

Open access
Vissoci, Joao Ricardo Nickenig, Hertz, Julian, El-Gabri, Deena, Andrade Do Nascimento, José Roberto, Pestillo De Oliveira, Leonardo, Mmbaga, Blandina Theophil, Mvungi, Mark, Staton, Catherine A·2018·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

AIMS: To develop Swahili versions of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and CAGE questionnaires and evaluate their psychometric properties in a traumatic brain injury (TBI) population in Tanzania. METHODS: Swahili versions of the AUDIT and CAGE were developed through translation and back-translation by a panel of native speakers of both English and Swahili. The translated instruments were administered to a sample of Tanzanian adults from a TBI registry. The validity and reliability were analyzed using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: The translated versions of both the AUDIT and CAGE questionnaires were found to have excellent language clarity and domain coherence. Reliability was acceptable (>0.85) for all tested versions. Confirmatory factor analysis of one, two and three factor solution for the AUDIT and one factor solution for the CAGE showed adequate results. AUDIT and CAGE scores were strongly correlated to each other (R > 0.80), and AUDIT scores were significantly lower in non-drinkers compared to drinkers. CONCLUSIONS: This article presents the first Swahili and Tanzanian adaptations of the AUDIT and CAGE instruments as well as the first validation of these questionnaires with TBI patients. Both instruments were found to have acceptable psychometric properties, resulting in two new useful tools for medical and social research in this setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/agx058

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Alvarado ME, Garmendia ML, Acuna G, et al. (2009) [Assessment of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) to detect problem drinkers]. Rev Med Chil 137:1463–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. de Meneses-Gaya C, Zuardi A, Loureiro S, et al. (2009) Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): an updated systematic review of psychometric properties. Psychology & Neuroscience [Online], 2:83–97. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hernandez-Nieto R. (2002) Contributions to Statistical Analysis. Merida: Universidad de Los Andes. [Google Scholar]
  4. Moretti-Pires RO, Corradi-Webster CM (2011) [Adaptation and validation of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) for a river population in the Brazilian Amazon]. Cad Saude Publica 27:497–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vissoci J, Meier B, Staton C (2016) Effect of Pre-morbid Mental Health Conditions on Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Outcomes. Moshi, Tanzania: Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center. [Google Scholar]
  6. What is a standard drink? (2017, August 15). https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/what-standard-drink. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vissoci, J. R. N., Hertz, J., El-Gabri, D., Andrade Do Nascimento, J. R., Pestillo De Oliveira, L., Mmbaga, B. T., Mvungi, M., & Staton, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Duke Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, North Carolina, 27710, USA
  • Duke University (US)
  • Graduate Program in Physical Education, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Av. José de Sá Maniçoba, Petrolina/PE, 56304-917, Brazil
  • Graduate Program in Health Promotion, Department of Health and Biological Sciences, UNICESUMAR, Av. Guedner 1610, Maringá/PR, 87050-900, Brazil
  • Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (TZ)
Corresponding author
Staton, Catherine A
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2017-10-07
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
112-120
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W2763505089
Cited by
40
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (K01TW010000)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
auditing, CAGE questionnaire, alcohol screening, traumatic brain injury, Swahili translation, cross-cultural adaptation, psychometric validation, alcoholism, Tanzanian adults, back-translation
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Adult, Aged, Alcoholism, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Tanzania, Translations, Reproducibility of Results, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review