Cited by 345Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

ALCOHOL USE AMONG SWEDES AND A PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE ALCOHOL USE DISORDERS IDENTIFICATION TEST

Bergman, H.·2002·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) was completed by 997 persons randomly selected from the general Swedish population (80% response rate). Eighteen per cent of the men and 5% of the women had hazardous or harmful alcohol use according to the > or =8 score criterion. AUDIT scores decreased with increasing age in both genders. Women are more sensitive to alcohol than men and when the cut-off score was set to > or =6, the female prevalence of hazardous or harmful alcohol use increased to nearly 11%. The 'binge drinking' question explained half of the total AUDIT variance and is thus the best item indicator of hazardous or harmful alcohol use in the test. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses revealed two AUDIT basic factors, the first three items defining a 'hazardous consumption' factor and the other seven items an 'alcohol-related problems' factor. Both the internal and test- retest reliability of the Swedish version of AUDIT were satisfactory. A table for converting raw scores to non-normalized T-scores for each combination of gender and three age intervals is presented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/37.3.245

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The basis for the female predilection in alcohol-induced nasal symptoms is not well understood.

    “but the basis for this predilection is not well understood.168-170”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [170]

    The Introduction discusses sex differences in blood-alcohol levels and alcohol-related harm, while the Discussion and Results address drinking patterns and AUDIT scores. Searches for female predilection and alcohol-induced nasal symptoms found no passage about nasal symptoms or why they might be more common in women. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Allen, J. P., Columbus, M. and Fertig, J. B. (1995) Assessment in alcoholism treatment: an overview. In National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Treatment Handbook Series 4, Allen, J. P. and Columbus, M. eds, pp. 1-9. US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD.
  2. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R. and McDonald, B. P. (1988) Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin 103, 391-410.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergman, H.
Affiliations
Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Bergman, H.
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
245-251
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W1995146706
Cited by
345
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Karolinska Institutet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, auditing, alcoholism, hazardous drinking, binge drinking, alcohol-related problems, psychometric validation, factor structure, test-retest reliability, gender differences, age differences, Swedish population, screening tool
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Alcohol-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review