Cited by 28Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The origin of the Hox/ParaHox genes, the Ghost Locus hypothesis and the complexity of the first animal

Open access
Ferrier, David E.K.·2016·Briefings in Functional Genomics

Abstract

A key aim in evolutionary biology is to deduce ancestral states to better understand the evolutionary origins of clades of interest and the diversification process(es) that has/have elaborated them. These ancestral deductions can hit difficulties when undetected loss events are misinterpreted as ancestral absences. With the ever-increasing amounts of animal genomic sequence data, we are gaining a much clearer view of the preponderance of differential gene losses across animal lineages. This has become particularly clear with recent progress in our understanding of the origins of the Hox/ParaHox developmental control genes relative to the earliest branching lineages of the animal kingdom: the sponges (Porifera), comb jellies (Ctenophora) and placozoans (Placozoa). These reassessments of the diversity and complexity of developmental control genes in the earliest animal ancestors need to go hand-in-hand with complementary advances in comparative morphology, phylogenetics and palaeontology to clarify our understanding of the complexity of the last common ancestor of all animals. The field is currently undergoing a shift from the traditional consensus of a sponge-like animal ancestor from which morphological and molecular elaboration subsequently evolved, to a scenario of a more complex animal ancestor, with subsequent losses and simplifications in various lineages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bfgp/elv056

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If sponges are monophyletic, sponge-like characters might be limited to sponges and not necessarily expected in other early metazoans, which may have been morphologically more complex.

    “If, on the other hand, sponges are monophyletic then such characters might be limited to the sponges and would not necessarily be expected in other early metazoans, which may have been morphologically more complex [111].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ryan JF, Pang K, Schnitzler CE, et al. The genome of the cteno- hore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolu- tion. Science 2013;342:1242592.
  2. Valentine JW. On the Origin of Phyla. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2004, 75.
  3. Tang F, Bengtson S, Wang Y, et al. Eoandromeda and the origin of Ctenophora. Evol Dev 2011;13(5):408-14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferrier, D. E. K.
Affiliations
University of St Andrews (GB)
Corresponding author
Ferrier, David E.K.
Venue
Briefings in Functional Genomics
Published
2015-12-04
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
333-341
ISSN
  • 2041-2647 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-2649
  • 2041-2657
OpenAlex
W2190160250
Cited by
28
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Functional Genomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Hox genes, ParaHox genes, developmental control genes, animal origins, gene loss, comb jellies, placozoans, sponges, Ctenophora, Placozoa, ancestral state reconstruction
MeSH terms
Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, Homeobox, Porifera, Genome, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review