Cited by 717Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesBacteriophages and microbial interactions

MetaQUAST: evaluation of metagenome assemblies

Open access
Mikheenko, Alla, Saveliev, Vladislav, Gurevich, Alexey·2016·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Summary: During the past years we have witnessed the rapid development of new metagenome assembly methods. Although there are many benchmark utilities designed for single-genome assemblies, there is no well-recognized evaluation and comparison tool for metagenomic-specific analogues. In this article, we present MetaQUAST, a modification of QUAST, the state-of-the-art tool for genome assembly evaluation based on alignment of contigs to a reference. MetaQUAST addresses such metagenome datasets features as (i) unknown species content by detecting and downloading reference sequences, (ii) huge diversity by giving comprehensive reports for multiple genomes and (iii) presence of highly relative species by detecting chimeric contigs. We demonstrate MetaQUAST performance by comparing several leading assemblers on one simulated and two real datasets. Availability and implementation: http://bioinf.spbau.ru/metaquast. Contact: aleksey.gurevich@spbu.ru Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv697

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Whole genomes of organisms, in addition to strain tracking, can be extracted from shotgun metagenomic data, allowing for evolutionary analysis of specific organisms associated with a particular disease or environment.

    “Whole genomes of organisms, in addition to strain tracking, can be extracted from the data, allowing for evolutionary analysis of specific organisms associated with a particular disease or environment.79, 80, 81”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mikheenko, A., Saveliev, V., & Gurevich, A.
Affiliations
St Petersburg University (RU)
Corresponding author
Gurevich, Alexey
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2015-11-26
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
1088-1090
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2175526948
Cited by
711
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Russian Science Foundation (14‐50‐00069, 14-50-)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Keywords
metagenome assembly, assembly evaluation, QUAST, assembler comparison, contig alignment
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Software, Metagenome, Metagenomics, Genomic Structural Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review