The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity
Abstract
The concept of plasticity describes the mechanisms that rearrange cerebral organization following a brain injury. During the last century, plasticity has been mainly investigated in humans with acute strokes. It was then shown: (i) that the brain is organized into highly specialized functional areas, often designated 'eloquent' areas and (ii) that a lesion within the eloquent area gives rise to major irrevocable deficits. However, in sharp contrast with these observations, it was recently found that patients with low-grade gliomas were able to undergo massive cerebral resections without detectable functional consequence. In this paper, we tackle this puzzling observation and address the idea that brain plasticity cannot be fully understood and fruitfully studied without considering the temporal pattern of the injury inflicted to the brain. To achieve this goal, we first review experimental evidence showing that functional recovery is considerably better in the context of slow-growing injuries than after acute lesions. Both human and animal data are considered. In a second step, we emphasize that slow and acute lesions involve very different patterns of reorganization. In agreement with this idea, we show that the recruitment of remote brain areas in the ipsi- and contralesional hemispheres is much more efficient in slow growing than acute lesions. Finally in a last section, we briefly discuss the main implications of these results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortical mechanisms of human imitation
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2526 · Cited by 2,683
Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5269.1791 · Cited by 1,911
Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex
Anderson, S. W., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/14833 · Cited by 1,539
The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love
Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.003 · Cited by 1,497 · cited 1×
“…the prefrontal cortex (Anderson et al., 1999), that religious experience is built into our nervous system within a restricted frontal-parietal network (Azari et al., 2001) and that romantic and maternal love engages the medial insula and the anterior cingulate cortex (Bartels and Zeki, 2000, 2004).”
BackgroundForward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher
Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1603_1 · Cited by 1,451
The contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production: A review and a hypothesis
Ackermann, H., & Riecker, A. (2004) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00347-x · Cited by 343
Cortical Language Activation in Stroke Patients Recovering From Aphasia With Functional MRI
Cao, Y., Vikingstad, E. M., George, K. P., Johnson, A. F., & Welch, K. M. A. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.11.2331 · Cited by 299
Liu, Y., & Rouiller, E. M. (1999) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210050830 · Cited by 249
Cited by
Stimulation mapping of white matter tracts to study brain functional connectivity.
Duffau, H. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.51 · Cited by 437
Self-citationDuffau, H. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.005 · Cited by 331
Self-citationMapping neuroplastic potential in brain-damaged patients
Herbet, G., Maheu, M., Costi, E., Lafargue, G., & Duffau, H. (2016) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awv394 · Cited by 289
Self-citationStructural disconnections explain brain network dysfunction after stroke
Griffis, J. C., Metcalf, N. V., Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.100 · Cited by 213
van Geemen, K., Herbet, G., Moritz‐Gasser, S., & Duffau, H. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22275 · Cited by 115
Self-citationNeural pathways subserving face-based mentalizing
Yordanova, Y. N., Duffau, H., & Herbet, G. (2017) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-017-1388-0 · Cited by 102
Self-citationDe Benedictis, A., Petit, L., Descoteaux, M., Marras, C. E., Barbareschi, M., Corsini, F., Dallabona, M., Chioffi, F., & Sarubbo, S. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23339 · Cited by 97
Re-establishing the merits of electrical brain stimulation
Desmurget, M., Song, Z., Mottolese, C., & Sirigu, A. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.07.002 · Cited by 90
Self-citationEsslinger, C., Schüler, N., Sauer, C., Gass, D., Mier, D., Braun, U., Ochs, E., Schulze, T. G., Rietschel, M., Kirsch, P., et al. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22165 · Cited by 70
Douw, L., Baayen, H., Bosma, I., Klein, M., Vandertop, P., Heimans, J., Stam, K., de Munck, J., & Reijneveld, J. (2008) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.03.013 · Cited by 70
Duffau, H. (2021) · Acta Neurochirurgica · doi:10.1007/s00701-021-04752-z · Cited by 69
Self-citationSzalisznyo, K., Silverstein, D. N., Duffau, H., & Smits, A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069798 · Cited by 40
Self-citationDissociation of Broca’s area from Broca’s aphasia in patients undergoing neurosurgical resections
Andrews, J. P., Cahn, N., Speidel, B. A., Chung, J. E., Levy, D. F., Wilson, S. M., Berger, M. S., & Chang, E. F. (2023) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2022.6.jns2297 · Cited by 37
Herbet, G. (2021) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.635439 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Desmurget, M., Bonnetblanc, F., & Duffau, H.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-11-21
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 898-914
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2053108157
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
