Cited by 502Face Recognition and PerceptionMemory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Fear, faces, and the human amygdala

Open access
Adolphs, Ralph·2008·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

The amygdala's historical role in processing stimuli related to threat and fear is being modified to suggest a role that is broader and more abstract. Amygdala lesions impair the ability to seek out and make use of the eye region of faces, resulting in impaired fear perception. Other studies in rats and humans revive earlier proposals that the amygdala is important not only for fear perception as such, but also for detecting saliency and biological relevance. Debates about some features of this processing now suggest that while the amygdala can process fearful facial expressions in the absence of conscious perception, and while there is some degree of preattentive processing, this depends on the context and is not necessarily more rapid than cortical processing routes. A large current research effort extends the amygdala's putative role to a number of psychiatric illnesses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2008.06.006

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adolphs, R.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Adolphs, Ralph
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
166-172
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044394944
Cited by
502
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 42
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080721, R01MH067681)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
amygdala, fear perception, facial expressions, threat processing, amygdala lesions, saliency detection, biological relevance, conscious perception, preattentive processing, mental illness
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Discrimination Learning, Emotions, Facial Expression, Fear, Humans, Mental Processes, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review