Cited by 81Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesMultisensory perception and integrationBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

The role of congruency in retronasal odor referral to the mouth

Lim, J., Johnson, M. B.·2012·Chemical Senses

Abstract

Referral of retronasal odors to the mouth is a fundamental phenomenon of flavor perception. A previous study from this laboratory provided evidence that, contrary to prior speculation, taste rather than touch was the primary factor in retronasal odor referral. The present study further investigated this question by studying the role of congruency between taste and odor on retronasal odor referral under conditions that mimicked natural food consumption. Subjects performed odor localization tasks after sampling gelatin stimuli that contained various congruent and incongruent tastes-odor combinations. The results showed that when a congruent taste was added, referral to the oral cavity and tongue were significantly enhanced. In addition, the data also indicate that the degree of congruency between taste and odor may modulate the degree of odor referral to the mouth. These findings suggest that odor referral is maximized when congruent flavor dimensions are combined to trigger perceptual "flavor objects" that represent known or potential foods. The results are discussed in terms of the factors that play a role in the retronasal odor referral as well as the potential neural mechanisms that may underlie it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/chemse/bjs003

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Further studies with solid gelatine disks and more ecologically valid stimulus combinations revealed that oral referral is enhanced proportional to the degree of self-reported smell-taste congruency.

    “Further studies conducted with solid gelatine disks instead of liquid solutions [191], and with more ecologically valid stimulus combinations (citral aroma with sweet or sour tastants, co ee aroma with sweet or bitter tastants) revealed similar results where oral referral was enhanced proportional to the degree of self-reported smell-taste congruency [192].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, J., & Johnson, M. B.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
ORCID
Lim, J.
Venue
Chemical Senses
Published
2012-02-02
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
515-522
ISSN
  • 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3553
OpenAlex
W2134141851
Cited by
81
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Senses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
flavor perception, odor localization
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Food, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth, Odorants, Smell, Taste, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review