Cited by 39Multisensory perception and integrationOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesTactile and Sensory Interactions

The role of attention in the localization of odors to the mouth

Open access
Stevenson, Richard J., Mahmut, Mehmet K., Oaten, Megan J.·2011·Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

Abstract

Odors can be perceived as arising from the environment or as part of a flavor located in the mouth. One factor that may dictate where an odor is perceived to be is concurrent gustatory stimulation in the mouth. A taste may impair the ability to attend to an odor, especially if they are perceptually similar. Alternatively, salient mouth-based features of a flavor might command attention at the expense of smell. Experiment 1 and 2, using different stimulus sets, explored the impact of perceptually similar and dissimilar pairings of tastes in the mouth and odors at the nose. In each case, these were followed by judgments of the odor's location (mouth vs. nose). Perceptual similarity had no impact on localization judgments. Experiment 3 then manipulated the salience of the olfactory and gustatory cues and showed that each could independently shift the perceived location of an odorant-salient olfactory cues toward the nose and gustatory cues toward the mouth. These findings suggest that the salient features of a flavor may command attention at the expense of olfaction and, thereby, contribute to oral localization, with implications for flavor binding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13414-010-0013-6

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The degree of oral referral is proportional to the intensity of tastants and inversely proportional to the intensity of olfactory stimuli.

    “the degree of oral referral is proportional to the intensity of the tastants, and inversely proportional to the intensity of olfactory stimuli [186].”

    From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [186]

    Experiment 3’s Localization ratings report more oral localization with strong than weak sucrose and less with the higher-concentration plum odor condition. But that odor condition also contained a nasal irritant, so the paper does not isolate an inverse effect of odor intensity; nor does it establish a strictly proportional relationship. The General discussion describes these findings in terms of how strongly oral and nasal stimuli command attention. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Flavours appear to originate from the oral cavity even if olfactory stimuli are detected in the nose.

    “flavours appear to originate from the oral cavity, even if olfactory stimuli are detected in the nose (e.g., [184-186]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevenson, R. J., Mahmut, M. K., & Oaten, M. J.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Stevenson, Richard J.
Venue
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
Published
2010-11-19
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
247-258
ISSN
  • 1943-3921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-393X
OpenAlex
W2022170870
Cited by
39
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
odor localization, attention, taste-odor interaction, olfaction, taste perception, perceptual similarity, salience, flavor perception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Odorants, Orientation, Sensory Thresholds, Smell, Taste, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review