Cited by 270Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesMultisensory perception and integrationBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Taste and olfaction: Independence vs interaction

Murphy, Claire, Cain, William S.·1980·Physiology & Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9384(80)90257-7

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, C., & Cain, W. S.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
601-605
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062321816
Cited by
270
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
taste-odor interaction, olfaction, taste perception, citral, sodium chloride, sucrose, sensory inhibition
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Sensory Thresholds, Smell, Sodium Chloride, Sucrose, Taste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review