The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19 (June 2020)
Open accessAbstract
IDSA Disclaimer: As of the time of this publication, updates have been made to IDSA’s Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19. For the most updated version of these guidelines, please go to https://www.idsociety.org/covid19guidelines. Background: Accurate molecular diagnostic tests are necessary for confirming a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Direct detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acids in respiratory tract specimens informs patient, healthcare institution, and public health–level decision-making. The number of available SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection tests is rapidly increasing, as is the COVID-19 diagnostic literature. Thus, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recognized a significant need for frequently updated systematic reviews of the literature to inform evidence-based best practice guidance. Objective: The IDSA’s goal was to develop an evidence-based diagnostic guidelines to assist clinicians, clinical laboratorians, patients, and policy makers in decisions related to the optimal use of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests. In addition, the society provides a conceptual framework for understanding molecular diagnostic test performance, discusses the nuance of test result interpretation in a variety of practice settings, and highlights important unmet research needs in the COVID-19 diagnostic testing arena. Methods: IDSA convened a multidisciplinary panel of infectious diseases clinicians, clinical microbiologists, and experts in systematic literature review to identify and prioritize clinical questions and outcomes related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostics. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make testing recommendations. Results: The panel agreed on 15 diagnostic recommendations. Conclusions: Universal access to accurate SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing is critical for patient care, hospital infection prevention, and the public response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Information on the clinical performance of available tests is rapidly emerging, but the quality of evidence of the current literature is considered low to very low. Recognizing these limitations, the IDSA panel weighed available diagnostic evidence and recommends nucleic acid testing for all symptomatic individuals suspected of having COVID-19. In addition, testing is recommended for asymptomatic individuals who have had a known or suspected contact with a COVID-19 case. Testing asymptomatic individuals without known exposure is suggested when the results will impact isolation/quarantine/personal protective equipment usage decisions, dictate eligibility for surgery, or inform administration of immunosuppressive therapy. Ultimately, prioritization of testing will depend on institution-specific resources and the needs of different patient populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
Whiting, P. F., Rutjes, A. W. S., Westwood, M. E., Mallett, S., Deeks, J. J., Reitsma, J. B., Leeflang, M. M. G., Sterne, J. A. C., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & the QUADAS-2 Group* (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 · Cited by 14,199
Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019
Wölfel, R., Corman, V. M., Guggemos, W., Seilmaier, M., Zange, S., Müller, M. A., Niemeyer, D., Jones, T. C., Vollmar, P., Rothe, C., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x · Cited by 6,661
Lauer, S. A., Grantz, K. H., Bi, Q., Jones, F. K., Zheng, Q., Meredith, H. R., Azman, A. S., Reich, N. G., & Lessler, J. (2020) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m20-0504 · Cited by 5,970
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Atkins, D., Brozek, J., Vist, G., Alderson, P., Glasziou, P., Falck-Ytter, Y., & Schünemann, H. J. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012 · Cited by 1,911
Self-citationViral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples.
Pan, Y., Zhang, D., Yang, P., Poon, L. L. M., & Wang, Q. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30113-4 · Cited by 1,562
Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the Icelandic population
Gudbjartsson, D. F., Helgason, A., Jonsson, H., Magnusson, O. T., Melsted, P., Norddahl, G. L., Saemundsdottir, J., Sigurdsson, A., Sulem, P., Agustsdottir, A. B., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2006100 · Cited by 1,248
Yang, Y., Yang, M., Shen, C., Wang, F., Yuan, J., Li, J., Zhang, M., Wang, Z., Xing, L., Wei, J., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.02.11.20021493 · Cited by 836 · cited 1×
“Seven studies reported on sensitivity, of which three had a case control design [35, 49, 50] and one reported results per sample and not per patient [51].”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- Zhu, 2020, A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019, N Engl J Med, 382, 727, 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 · DOI · Paper page
- Lu, 2020, Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding, Lancet, 395, 565, 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Gorbalenya, 2020, The species severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2, Nat Microbiol, 5, 536, 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z · DOI · Paper page
- Organization, Novel coronavirus-2019 events-as-they happen
- Adminsitration FaD, Coronavirus disease in vitro diagnostics EUAs
- Morgan, 2018, Development of rapid guidelines: 3. GIN-McMaster Guidelines Development Checklist extension for rapid recommendations, Health Res Policy Syst, 16, 63, 10.1186/s12961-018-0330-0 · DOI
- Tolia, 2020, Preliminary results of initial testing for coronavirus (COVID-19) in the emergency department, West J Emerg Med, 21, 503, 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.47348 · doi:10.5811/westjem.2020.3.47348
- Liu, 2020, Positive rate of RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in 4880 cases from one hospital in Wuhan, China, from Jan to Feb 2020, Clin Chim Acta, 505, 172, 10.1016/j.cca.2020.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
- Kimball, 2020, Asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in residents of a long-term care skilled nursing facility—King County, Washington, March 2020, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 69, 10.15585/mmwr.mm6913e1 · DOI · Paper page
- Hu, 2020, Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened among close contacts in Nanjing, China, 706
- Jianyun, 2020, COVID-19 outbreak associated with air conditioning in restaurant, Guangzhou, China, 2020, Emerg Infect Dis J, 26
- Gostic, 2020, Estimated effectiveness of symptom and risk screening to prevent the spread of COVID-19, eLife, 9, e55570, 10.7554/eLife.55570 · DOI · Paper page
- Wei, 2020, Presymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2—Singapore, January 23-March 16, 2020, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 69, 411, 10.15585/mmwr.mm6914e1 · DOI · Paper page
- Sutton, 2020, Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 in women admitted for delivery, N Engl J Med, 382, 2163, 10.1056/NEJMc2009316 · DOI · Paper page
- Yu, 2020, SARS-CoV-2 transmission in cancer patients of a tertiary hospital in Wuhan, 1108
- Schunemann, 2020, GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy, J Clin Epidemiol, 122, 129, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.020 · DOI · Paper page
- Schunemann, 2020, GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables, J Clin Epidemiol, 122, 142, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.021 · DOI · Paper page
- 2015, GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro guidelines development tool [software]
- Alexander, 2014, World Health Organization recommendations are often strong based on low confidence in effect estimates, J Clin Epidemiol, 67, 629, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.020 · DOI
- Guyatt, 2015, Guidelines panels should not GRADE good practice statements, J Clin Epidemiol, 68, 597, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.011 · DOI · Paper page
- Bordi, 2020, Differential diagnosis of illness in patients under investigation for the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), Italy, February 2020, Euro Surveill, 25, :2000170, 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.8.2000170 · DOI
- Hsih, 2020, Featuring COVID-19 cases via screening symptomatic patients with epidemiologic link during flu season in a medical center of central Taiwan, J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 53, 459, 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.03.008 · DOI
- Infectious Diseases Society of America, COVID-19 Prioritization of Diagnostic Testing
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Priorities for testing patients with suspected COVID-19 infection
- Wang, 2020, Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens, JAMA, 323, 1843
- Gao, 2020, Evaluation the auxiliary diagnosis value of antibodies assays for detection of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) causing an outbreak of pneumonia (COVID-19)
- Pere, 2020, Nasal swab sampling for SARS-CoV-2: a convenient alternative in time of nasopharyngeal swab shortage, J Clin Microbiol, 58, e00721, 10.1128/JCM.00721-20 · DOI
- Yu, 2020, Quantitative detection and viral load analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in infected patients, Clin Infect Dis, 71, 793, 10.1093/cid/ciaa345 · DOI · Paper page
- Williams, 2020, Saliva as a non-invasive specimen for detection of SARS-CoV-2, e00776
- Zou, 2020, SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients, N Engl J Med, 382, 1177, 10.1056/NEJMc2001737 · DOI · Paper page
- Wehrhahn, 2020, Self-collection: an appropriate alternative during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104417 · DOI
- Tan, 2020, Viral kinetics and antibody responses in patients with COVID-19, 10.1101/2020.03.24.20042382 · DOI · Paper page
- Seaman, 2019, Self-collected compared with professional-collected swabbing in the diagnosis of influenza in symptomatic individuals: a meta-analysis and assessment of validity, J Clin Virol, 118, 28, 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.07.010 · DOI
- Kim, 2020, Viral load kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 infection in first two patients in Korea, J Korean Med Sci, 35, e86, 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e86 · DOI · Paper page
- Yang, 2020, Evaluating the accuracy of different respiratory specimens in the laboratory diagnosis and monitoring the viral shedding of 2019-nCoV infections, medRxiv, 2020.02.11.20021493
- Lin, 2020, Comparison of throat swabs and sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in 52 cases of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) infected pneumonia (COVID-19), medRxiv, 58, 1089
- Yu, 2020, Rapid colorimetric detection of COVID-19 coronavirus using a reverse transcriptional loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) diagnostic platform: iLACO, 975
- Harrington, 2020, Comparison of Abbott ID Now and Abbott m2000 methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs from symptomatic patients, e00798
- Rhoads, 2020, Comparison of Abbott ID Now, Diasorin Simplexa, and CDC FDA EUA methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs from individuals diagnosed with COVID-19, e00760
- Danis, 2020, Cluster of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) in the French Alps, 2020, Clin Infect Dis, ciaa424, 10.1093/cid/ciaa424 · DOI · Paper page
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Interim U.S. guidance for risk assessment and public health management of healthcare personnel with potential exposure in a healthcare setting to patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infection control guidance for healthcare professionals about coronavirus (COVID-19)
- Liang, 2020, Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China, Lancet Oncol, 21, 335, 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30096-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Desai, 2020, COVID-19 and cancer: lessons from a pooled meta-analysis, JCO Glob Oncol, 6, 557, 10.1200/GO.20.00097 · DOI · Paper page
- Abbas, 2017, Respiratory viruses in transplant recipients: more than just a cold. Clinical syndromes and infection prevention principles, Int J Infect Dis, 62, 86, 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.07.011 · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2017.07.011
- Pochon, 2018, Respiratory virus infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, Front Microbiol, 9, 3294, 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03294 · DOI
- Centers, Health care Infection Prevention and Control FAQs for COVID-19
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Prevention Strategies for Seasonal Influenza in Health care Settings
- World Health Organization, Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19
- World Health Organization, Epidemic- and pandemic-prone acute respiratory diseases - Infection prevention and control in health care
- Lei, 2020, Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries during the incubation period of COVID-19 infection, EClinicalMedicine, 21, 100331, 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100331 · DOI · Paper page
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Evaluating and testing persons for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
- Infectious Diseases Society of America, IDSA COVID-19 antibody testing primer
- Winichakoon, 2020, Negative nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs do not rule out COVID-19, J Clin Microbiol, 58, 10.1128/JCM.00297-20 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhou, 2020, Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study, Lancet, 395, 1054, 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Persistent neurologic symptoms and cognitive dysfunction in non-hospitalized COVID-19 “long haulers”
Graham, E. L., Clark, J. R., Orban, Z. S., Lim, P. H., Szymanski, A. L., Taylor, C., DiBiase, R. M., Jia, D. T., Balabanov, R., Ho, S. U., et al. (2021) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.51350 · Cited by 693
False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic review
Arevalo-Rodriguez, I., Buitrago-Garcia, D., Simancas-Racines, D., Zambrano-Achig, P., Del Campo, R., Ciapponi, A., Sued, O., Martinez-García, L., Rutjes, A. W., Low, N., et al. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242958 · Cited by 656
LitCovid: an open database of COVID-19 literature
Chen, Q., Allot, A., & Lu, Z. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa952 · Cited by 253
Post-COVID-19 fatigue: a systematic review
Joli, J., Buck, P., Zipfel, S., & Stengel, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.947973 · Cited by 155
Wallia, A., Prince, G., Touma, E., El Muayed, M., & Seley, J. J. (2020) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-020-01366-0 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanson, K. E., Caliendo, A. M., Arias, C. A., Englund, J. A., Lee, M. J., Loeb, M., Patel, R., El Alayli, A., Kalot, M. A., Falck-Ytter, Y., Lavergne, V., Morgan, R. L., Murad, M. H., Sultan, S., Bhimraj, A., & Mustafa, R. A.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-06-16
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e106-e132
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W3036717743
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Funders
- Infectious Diseases Society of America
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19 (June 2020). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/ciaa760
- The paper
- Hanson, K. E., Caliendo, A. M., Arias, C. A., Englund, J. A., Lee, M. J., Loeb, M., Patel, R., El Alayli, A., Kalot, M. A., Falck-Ytter, Y., Lavergne, V., Morgan, R. L., Murad, M. H., Sultan, S., Bhimraj, A., & Mustafa, R. A. (2024). Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19 (June 2020). Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa760
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.