Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Viral Kinetics and Antibody Responses in Patients with COVID-19

Open access
Tan, Wenting, Lu, Yanqiu, Zhang, Juan, Wang, Jing, Dan, Yunjie, Tan, Zhaoxia, He, Xiaoqing, Qian, Chunfang, Sun, Qiangzhong, Hu, Qingli, Liu, Honglan, Ye, Sikuan, Xiang, Xiaomei, Zhou, Yi, Zhang, Wei, Guo, Yanzhi, Wang, Xiu-Hua, He, Weiwei, Wan, Xing, Sun, Fengming, Wei, Quanfang, Chen, Cong, Pan, Guangqiang, Xia, Jie, Mao, Qing, Chen, Yaokai, Deng, Guohong·2020·medRxiv

Abstract

Background: A pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been spreading over the world. However, the viral dynamics, host serologic responses, and their associations with clinical manifestations, have not been well described in prospective cohort. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort and enrolled 67 COVID-19 patients admitting between Jan 26 and Feb 5, 2020. Clinical specimens including nasopharyngeal swab, sputum, blood, urine and stool were tested periodically according to standardized case report form with final follow-up on February 27. The routes and duration of viral shedding, antibody response, and their associations with disease severity and clinical manifestations were systematically evaluated. Coronaviral particles in clinical specimens were observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results: The median duration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding were 12 (3-38), 19 (5-37), and 18 (7-26) days in nasopharyngeal swabs, sputum and stools, respectively. Only 13 urines (5.6%) and 12 plasmas (5.7%) were viral positive. Prolonged viral shedding was observed in severe patients than that of non-severe patients. Cough but not fever, aligned with viral shedding in clinical respiratory specimens, meanwhile the positive stool-RNA appeared to align with the proportion who concurrently had cough and sputum production, but not diarrhea. Typical coronaviral particles could be found directly in sputum by TEM. The anti-nucleocapsid-protein IgM started on day 7 and positive rate peaked on day 28, while that of IgG was on day 10 and day 49 after illness onset. IgM and IgG appear earlier, and their titers are significantly higher in severe patients than non-severe patients ( p <0.05). The weak responders for IgG had a significantly higher viral clearance rate than that of strong responders ( p = 0.011). Conclusions: Nasopharyngeal, sputum and stools rather than blood and urine, were the major shedding routes for SARS-CoV-2, and meanwhile sputum had a prolonged viral shedding. Symptom cough seems to be aligned with viral shedding in clinical respiratory and fecal specimens. Stronger antibody response was associated with delayed viral clearance and disease severity. Summary boxes: What is already known on this topic: As a newly appearing infectious disease, early efforts have focused on virus identification, describing the epidemiologic characteristics, clinical course, prognostics for critically illed cases and mortality. Among COVID-19 cases reported in mainland China (72 314 cases, updated through February 11, 2020), 81% are mild, 14% are severe, and 5% are critical. The estimated overall case fatality rate (CFR) is 2.3%. Some case series reported had shown that SARS-CoV-2 could shed in upper/lower respiratory specimens, stools, blood and urines of patients. However, important knowledge gaps remain, particularly regarding full kinetics of viral shedding and host serologic responses in association with clinical manifestations and host factors. What this study adds: The incubation period has no change after spreading out of Wuhan, and has no sex or age differences, however, children had prolonged incubation period. Due to early recognition and intervention, COVID-19 illness of Chongqing cohort is milder than that of Wuhan patients reported. This prospective cohort study on SARS-CoV-2 infection shows clearly that the viral and serological kinetics were related in duration of infection, disease severity, and clinical manifestations of COVID-19. Our data demonstrate that nasopharyngeal, sputum and stools are major shedding routes for SARS-CoV-2, and stronger NP antibody response is associated with delayed viral clearance and disease severity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.03.24.20042382

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Tan, W., Lu, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, J., Dan, Y., Tan, Z., He, X., Qian, C., Sun, Q., Hu, Q., Liu, H., Ye, S., Xiang, X., Zhou, Y., Zhang, W., Guo, Y., Wang, X.-H., He, W., Wan, X., Sun, F., Wei, Q., Chen, C., Pan, G., Xia, J., Mao, Q., Chen, Y., & Deng, G.
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-03-26
OpenAlex
W3015060295
Cited by
301
References
5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Viral Kinetics and Antibody Responses in Patients with COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/2020.03.24.20042382
The paper
Tan, W., Lu, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, J., Dan, Y., Tan, Z., He, X., Qian, C., Sun, Q., Hu, Q., Liu, H., Ye, S., Xiang, X., Zhou, Y., Zhang, W., Guo, Y., Wang, X.-H., He, W., Wan, X., . . . Deng, G. (2020). Viral Kinetics and Antibody Responses in Patients with COVID-19. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.24.20042382

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.