Cited by 87Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtist diversity and phylogenyMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Genome Networks Root the Tree of Life between Prokaryotic Domains

Open access
Dagan, Tal, Roettger, Mayo, Bryant, David, Martin, William·2010·Genome Biology and Evolution

Abstract

Eukaryotes arose from prokaryotes, hence the root in the tree of life resides among the prokaryotic domains. The position of the root is still debated, although pinpointing it would aid our understanding of the early evolution of life. Because prokaryote evolution was long viewed as a tree-like process of lineage bifurcations, efforts to identify the most ancient microbial lineage split have traditionally focused on positioning a root on a phylogenetic tree constructed from one or several genes. Such studies have delivered widely conflicting results on the position of the root, this being mainly due to methodological problems inherent to deep gene phylogeny and the workings of lateral gene transfer among prokaryotes over evolutionary time. Here, we report the position of the root determined with whole genome data using network-based procedures that take into account both gene presence or absence and the level of sequence similarity among all individual gene families that are shared across genomes. On the basis of 562,321 protein-coding gene families distributed across 191 genomes, we find that the deepest divide in the prokaryotic world is interdomain, that is, separating the archaebacteria from the eubacteria. This result resonates with some older views but conflicts with the results of most studies over the last decade that have addressed the issue. In particular, several studies have suggested that the molecular distinctness of archaebacteria is not evidence for their antiquity relative to eubacteria but instead stems from some kind of inherently elevated rate of archaebacterial sequence change. Here, we specifically test for such a rate elevation across all prokaryotic lineages through the analysis of all possible quartets among eight genes duplicated in all prokaryotes, hence the last common ancestor thereof. The results show that neither the archaebacteria as a group nor the eubacteria as a group harbor evidence for elevated evolutionary rates in the sampled genes, either in the recent evolutionary past or in their common ancestor. The interdomain prokaryotic position of the root is thus not attributable to lineage-specific rate variation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gbe/evq025

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The deepest, most ancient split in the prokaryotic world is that separating eubacteria from archaebacteria.

    “That dichotomy is also mirrored by a number of other cellular, molecular and gene homology attributes, indicating that the deepest, most ancient split in the prokaryotic world is that separating eubacteria from archaebacteria [111,116,122].”

    From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [122]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chistoserdova L Vorholt JA Thauer RK Lidstrom ME C1 transfer enzymes and coenzymes linking methylotrophic bacteria and methanogenic Archaea Science 1998 281 99 102 9651254
  2. Sleep NH Meibom A Fridriksson T Coleman RG Bird DK H2-rich fluids from serpentinization: geochemical and biotic implications Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 101 12818 12823 15326313 PMC516479

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dagan, T., Roettger, M., Bryant, D., & Martin, W.
Affiliations
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Dagan, Tal
Venue
Genome Biology and Evolution
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
2
Pages
379-392
ISSN
1759-6653 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130436157
Cited by
87
References
107
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Genome Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Royal Society
  • Royal Society Te Apārangi
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
archaea, bacteria, eukaryotic origin, horizontal gene transfer, phylogenetic networks, molecular clock, rate heterogeneity, last common ancestor
MeSH terms
Archaea, Bacteria, Multigene Family, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Prokaryotic Cells, Genome, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Regulatory Networks, INDEL Mutation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review