Cited by 83Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsDietary Effects on HealthSirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine

Housing Density Does Not Influence the Longevity Effect of Calorie Restriction

Ikeno, Y., Hubbard, G. B., Lee, S., Richardson, A., Strong, R., Diaz, V., Nelson, J. F.·2005·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

This study examined the effect of housing density on the longevity-extending and disease-delaying actions of calorie restriction (CR). Singly or multiply housed (four per cage) mice were either fed ad libitum (AL) or were on CR beginning at 2 months. All CR mice were fed 40% less food than were multiply housed AL mice. CR increased median longevity by 19%, and housing density had no effect on this increase. CR also reduced neoplastic lesions in both housing groups, but lymphoma, the most common neoplasm, was reduced more in singly than in multiply housed mice. Singly housed AL mice ate 40% more food than did multiply housed AL mice, but weighed the same and lived as long as multiply housed AL mice. These results indicate that CR can extend life span as effectively in multiply as in singly housed mice, even though housing density can differentially affect the cancer-reducing effect of CR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/60.12.1510

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Median lifespan of vehicle-treated C57BL/6 males, but not females, was short of the normal range of lifespans for unmanipulated males of this strain at different laboratories.

    “We note that the median lifespan of vehicle-treated C57BL/6 males, but not females, was short of the normal range of lifespans for unmanipulated males of this strain at different laboratories (Extended Data Fig. 4c, d) 15 - 28 , suggesting that repetitive vehicle injection stress may have negatively impacted C57BL/6 male longevity (Supplemenary Text).”

    From Naturally occurring p16Ink4a-positive cells shorten healthy lifespan (2016) · cites this paper as [21]

    Animal Husbandry (p. 2) identifies the study animals as male C57BL/6J mice, and Effect of Food Intake & Housing Density on Life Span (p. 4) reports a median survival of approximately 930 days for its ad-libitum groups. This provides a male lifespan benchmark for the citing paper’s comparison, but this source does not assess vehicle-treated mice, females, or whether either sex falls outside a normal range across laboratories. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [16]16. Hosmer Jr DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Survival Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
  2. [20]20. Dunn TB. Normal and pathologic anatomy of the reticular tissue in laboratory mice. Natl Cancer Inst Monograph. 1954;14:1281-1433.
  3. [27]27. Van Remmen H, Ikeno Y, Hamilton M, et al. Increased oxidative damage to DNA increases cancer but does not accelerate aging. Physiol Genomics. 2003;16:29-37.
  4. [28]28. Shackelford CC, Elwell MR. Small and large intestine, and mesentery. In: Maronport RR, ed. Pathology of the Mouse. Vienna, IL: Cache River Press; 1999:81-118.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ikeno, Y., Hubbard, G. B., Lee, S., Richardson, A., Strong, R., Diaz, V., & Nelson, J. F.
Affiliations
  • South Texas Veterans Health Care System (US)
  • Texas Biomedical Research Institute (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ikeno, Y.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
60
Issue
12
Pages
1510-1517
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2114331328
Cited by
83
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 19899, 1P30- AG13319, R01AG019899, P30AG013319)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine
Keywords
caloric restriction, housing density, longevity, lifespan extension, neoplastic lesions, lymphoma, mice, ad libitum feeding, cancer prevention
MeSH terms
Animals, Crowding, Longevity, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Caloric Restriction, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review