Cited by 156Elder Abuse and NeglectCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Elder Fraud and Financial Exploitation: Application of Routine Activity Theory

Open access
DeLiema, Marguerite·2018·The Gerontologist

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Elder financial exploitation, committed by individuals in positions of trust, and elder fraud, committed by predatory strangers, are two forms of financial victimization that target vulnerable older adults. This study analyzes differences between fraud and financial exploitation victims and tests routine activity theory as a contextual model for victimization. Routine activity theory predicts that criminal opportunities arise when a motivated offender and suitable target meet in the absence of capable guardians. Research Design and Methods: Fifty-three financial exploitation and fraud cases were sampled from an elder abuse forensic center. Data include law enforcement and caseworker investigation reports, victim medical records, perpetrator demographic information, and forensic assessments of victim health and cognitive functioning. Results: Fraud and financial exploitation victims performed poorly on tests of cognitive functioning and financial decision making administered by a forensic neuropsychologist following the allegations. Based on retrospective record review, there were few significant differences in physical health and cognitive functioning at the time victims' assets were taken, although their social contexts were different. Significantly more fraud victims were childless compared with financial exploitation victims. Fraud perpetrators took advantage of elders when they had no trustworthy friends or relatives to safeguard their assets. Discussion and Implications: Findings support an adapted routine activity theory as a contextual model for financial victimization. Fraud most often occurred when a vulnerable elder was solicited by a financial predator in the absence of capable guardians. Prevention efforts should focus on reducing social isolation to enhance protection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnw258

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Holtfreter, K., & Meyers, T. J. (2015). Challenges for cybercrime theory, research, and policy. In G. C. Lajeunessehe (Ed.), Norwich review of international and transnational crime (pp. 54-66). Norwich, VT: The Program of International and Transnational Crime.
  2. Naimark, D. (2001). Financial exploitation of the elderly: The evalu- ation of mental capacity and undue influence. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 22, 5-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeLiema, M.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
DeLiema, Marguerite
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2017-03-10
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
706-718
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2592878068
Cited by
156
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
12.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (T32AG000037)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
elder fraud, elder financial abuse, routine activity theory, older adults, cognitive function, financial decision-making, social isolation, guardianship, fraud perpetrators, fraud victims, elder abuse
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Elder Abuse, Female, Fraud, Humans, Male, United States, Mental Competency, Crime Victims, Needs Assessment, Law Enforcement, Vulnerable Populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review