Cited by 100Securities Regulation and Market PracticesFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisCybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies

Profiling Victims of Investment Fraud: Mindsets and Risky Behaviors

Deliema, Marguerite, Shadel, Doug, Pak, Karla·2020·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

Millions of Americans are targeted by investment scams, resulting in billions of dollars lost each year. Previous research indicates that investment fraud victims are more likely to be male, white, and married, and to have higher socioeconomic status compared to the general US population, but little research examines what behaviors and mindsets differentiate them from other investors. A telephone survey was administered to 214 investment fraud victims and 813 general investors recruited using random digit dialing. Based on the opportunity model of predatory victimization, the aim was to identify differences in investment behaviors and psychological mindsets that may affect exposure to investment scams and make individuals more attractive and susceptible targets. In addition to being older and male, victims were more materialistic than general investors and were more frequent stock traders, and purchased more investments sold through unsolicited calls, emails, television advertisements, or “free lunch” seminars, but were less likely to invest based on a social network member’s recommendation. As more retirees begin to take on managing their retirement assets, many may be tempted by unreasonable investment returns promised by unscrupulous brokers. Findings point to specific areas where investor education is needed to counteract poor investment decision-making and risky mindsets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jcr/ucz020

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deliema, M., Shadel, D., & Pak, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • AARP (US)
Corresponding author
Deliema, Marguerite
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
2019-05-28
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
904-914
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2955622632
Cited by
100
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fraud Watch Network
  • AARP’s Fraud Watch Network
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Securities Regulation and Market Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Keywords
investment fraud, investment scams, opportunity model, materialism, retirement investing, investor education, investor decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review