Cited by 9Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsElectronic Health Records Systems

Democratising Healthcare: The Role of eHealth Technologies in Driving Patient Participation

Open access
Amann, Julia·2017·EMJ Innovations

Abstract

Digital technologies are changing how we practice and experience healthcare. This review focusses on the role of eHealth technologies in facilitating patient participation within the healthcare process. The central claim of this paper is that interactive, web-based technologies allow individuals to become more active participants in the healthcare process, thereby opening up new perspectives and opportunities for improving healthcare. By drawing on findings from recent research, the review seeks to highlight how the increasing availability of health information and individuals’ ability to easily connect to others around the globe can facilitate knowledge exchange and collaboration between the general public, patients, healthcare professionals, and researchers. Acknowledging some of the potential challenges and pitfalls further shows how these new technologies, if used appropriately, can promote a new form of patient participation that goes beyond the individual level and as such, constitutes an invaluable resource for healthcare research and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33590/emjinnov/10312722

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Musen MA et al. "Clinical decision- support systems". Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ (eds), Biomedical informatics (2014), London: Springer, pp.643-74.
  2. Amann J et al. Revisiting the concept of health literacy. The patient as information seeker and provider. EHPS. 2015;17(6):286-90.
  3. Ferguson T. "e-patients: how they can help us heal healthcare", Earp JAL et al. (eds.), Patient Advocacy for Health Care Quality: Strategies for Achieving Patient- Centered Care (2007), Sudbury, Jones & Bartlett Publishers, pp.93-150.
  4. Frydman GJ. Patient-Driven Research: Rich Opportunities and Real Risks. Journal of Participatory Medicine. 2009;1:e12.
  5. Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Community- based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (2011), San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Kiley R. Does the internet harm health?: Some evidence exists that the internet does harm health. BMJ. 2002;324(7331):238.
  7. Chalmers I. Invalid health information is potentially lethal. BMJ. 2001; 322(7292):998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amann, J.
Affiliations
University of Lucerne (CH)
Corresponding author
Amann, Julia
Venue
EMJ Innovations
Published
2017-01-10
Pages
40-46
ISSN
2513-8634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296297173
Cited by
9
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • EMJ Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
eHealth technologies, patient participation, web technologies, health information access, knowledge sharing, digital health, healthcare innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review