Cited by 91Endometriosis Research and TreatmentCancer Risks and FactorsEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Deep infiltrating endometriosis is associated with markedly lower body mass index: a 476 case-control study

Lafay Pillet, M.-C., Schneider, A., Borghese, B., Santulli, P., Souza, C., Streuli, I., de Ziegler, D., Chapron, C.·2012·Human Reproduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An inverse association between BMI and endometriosis has been reported but remains controversial. We decided to evaluate the association between BMI and the different types of endometriosis, classified as superficial endometriosis (SUP), deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) and ovarian endometrioma (OMA). METHODS: From a prospective database of patients who underwent gynecological surgery between February 2005 and October 2008, we compared 238 patients with a histological diagnosis of endometriosis to 238 age- and smoking-status-matched controls using a prospective preoperative questionnaire and surgical data. Numerical variables means were compared for matched pairs, and non-parametric variables using Wilcoxon test. The Odds ratios for all types of endometriosis adjusted for confounding variables were computed according to predefined BMI groups [1(<18.5), 2 (≥18.5 and <22), 3(≥22 and <25), 4(≥25)], taking Group 3 as the reference population. RESULTS: BMI was significantly lower for all 238 patients (21.70 ± 3.7 versus 23.29 ± 4.1, P < 0.001), for 101 OMA patients (21.88 ± 3.8 versus 22.99 ± 4, P < 0.038), and for 97 DIE patients (21.35 ± 3.4 versus 23.35 ± 3.8, P < 0.001) compared with their own controls, but not for the 40 SUP patients. Patients in Group 1 had adjusted odds ratios as high as 3.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-6.8] for DIE and 2.7 (95% CI: 1.1-6.8) for OMA; in Group 2, the adjusted oddd ratios were 2.6 (95% CI: 1.3-5.5) for DIE and 2.9 (95% CI: 1.5-5.4) for OMA. CONCLUSIONS: Endometriotic patients have lower BMI than age- and smoking-status-matched controls, independent of confounding variables. Patients with the lowest BMI (<18.5) are at a high risk of DIE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/der346

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lafay Pillet, M.-C., Schneider, A., Borghese, B., Santulli, P., Souza, C., Streuli, I., de Ziegler, D., & Chapron, C.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2011-10-24
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
265-272
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2157934906
Cited by
91
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
deep infiltrating endometriosis, body mass index, endometrioma, superficial endometriosis, underweight, endometriosis risk factors, gynecologic surgery, postoperative quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Regression Analysis, Smoking, Models, Statistical, Body Mass Index, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review