Cited by 171Endometriosis Research and TreatmentCancer Risks and FactorsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Body size and endometriosis: results from 20 years of follow-up within the Nurses' Health Study II prospective cohort

Open access
Shah, D. K., Correia, K. F., Vitonis, A. F., Missmer, S. A.·2013·Human Reproduction

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a relationship between body mass index (BMI), body shape and endometriosis? SUMMARY ANSWER: Endometriosis is inversely associated with early adult BMI and may correlate with a peripheral body fat distribution. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The literature suggests an inverse relation between endometriosis and BMI, although few studies have specifically explored this association in depth. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Prospective cohort study using data collected from 116 430 female nurses from September 1989 to June 2011 as part of the Nurses' Health Study II cohort. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, METHODS AND SETTING: Cases were restricted to laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis. Weight at age 18 and height were reported at baseline, and current weight was updated every 2 years. Waist and hip measurements were first taken in 1993 and updated in 2005. Rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 5504 incident cases of endometriosis were reported during 1 299 349 woman-years (incidence rate = 385 per 100 000 woman-years). BMI at age 18 and current BMI were each significantly inversely associated with endometriosis (P-value, test for linear trend <0.0001). Both associations were stronger among infertile women. Obese infertile women with current BMIs of 35-39.9 kg/m(2) and ≥ 40 kg/m(2) had a 55% (95% CI 0.30-0.67) and a 62% (95% CI 0.23-0.62) lower risk of endometriosis, respectively, compared with the low-normal BMI referent (18.5-22.4 kg/m(2)). Rates of endometriosis were nearly 3-fold higher in women with waist-to-hip ratios <0.60 (RR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.38-5.60) compared with those with waist-to-hip ratios between 0.70 and 0.79, although the sample size for this category was very small. LIMITATIONS AND REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although women with undiagnosed endometriosis certainly remain in the comparison population even in this prospective cohort study, the community prevalence of endometriosis in an asymptomatic population is very low. Moreover, the characteristics of this small proportion of undiagnosed cases are diluted among the >90 000 women accurately defined as being endometriosis-free and are, therefore, unlikely to impact on effect estimation. Although geographically diverse, the NHS II cohort is overwhelmingly Caucasian, which may limit generalizability to more ethnically diverse populations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY: The results of this study suggest that endometriosis is inversely associated with early adult BMI and may correlate with a peripheral body fat distribution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/det120

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, D. K., Correia, K. F., Vitonis, A. F., & Missmer, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2013-05-14
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
1783-1792
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2129350571
Cited by
171
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
FWCI
12.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA50385, R01CA050385)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD52473, R01HD057210, HD48544, R01HD052473, R03HD048544, HD57210)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
endometriosis, body mass index, body size, body fat distribution, waist-to-hip ratio, obesity, infertility, Nurses' Health Study II, women's reproductive health, body shape, time-varying covariates
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Nurses, Risk Factors, Incidence, Odds Ratio, Body Size, Waist-Hip Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review