Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ESHRE guideline: routine psychosocial care in infertility and medically assisted reproduction—a guide for fertility staff: Figure 1

Open access
Gameiro, S., Boivin, J., Dancet, E., de Klerk, C., Emery, M., Lewis-Jones, C., Thorn, P., Van den Broeck, U., Venetis, C., Verhaak, C.M., Wischmann, T., Vermeulen, N.·2015·Human Reproduction

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Based on the best available evidence in the literature, what is the optimal management of routine psychosocial care at infertility and medically assisted reproduction (MAR) clinics? SUMMARY ANSWER: Using the structured methodology of the Manual for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Guideline Development, 120 recommendations were formulated that answered the 12 key questions on optimal management of routine psychosocial care by all fertility staff. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: The 2002 ESHRE Guidelines for counselling in infertility has been a reference point for best psychosocial care in infertility for years, but this guideline needed updating and did not focus on routine psychosocial care that can be delivered by all fertility staff. STUDY, DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This guideline was produced by a group of experts in the field according to the 12-step process described in the ESHRE Manual for Guideline Development. After scoping the guideline and listing a set of 12 key questions in PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome) format, thorough systematic searches of the literature were conducted; evidence from papers published until April 2014 was collected, evaluated for quality and analysed. A summary of evidence was written in a reply to each of the key questions and used as the basis for recommendations, which were defined by consensus within the guideline development group (GDG). Patient and additional clinical input was collected during the scoping and the review phase of the guideline development. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The guideline group, comprising psychologists, two medical doctors, a midwife, a patient representative and a methodological expert, met three times to discuss evidence and reach consensus on the recommendations. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE THE GUIDELINE PROVIDES: 120 recommendations that aim at guiding fertility clinic staff in providing optimal evidence-based routine psychosocial care to patients dealing with infertility and MAR. The guideline is written in two sections. The first section describes patients' preferences regarding the psychosocial care they would like to receive at clinics and how this care is associated with their well-being. The second section of the guideline provides information about the psychosocial needs patients experience across their treatment pathway (before, during and after treatment) and how fertility clinic staff can detect and address these. Needs refer to conditions assumed necessary for patients to have a healthy experience of the fertility treatment. Needs can be behavioural (lifestyle, exercise, nutrition and compliance), relational (relationship with partner if there is one, family friends and larger network, and work), emotional (well-being, e.g. anxiety, depression and quality of life) and cognitive (treatment concerns and knowledge). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We identified many areas in care for which robust evidence was lacking. Gaps in evidence were addressed by formulating good practice points, based on the expert opinion of the GDG, but it is critical for such recommendations to be empirically validated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The evidence presented in this guideline shows that providing routine psychosocial care is associated with or has potential to reduce stress and concerns about medical procedures and improve lifestyle outcomes, fertility-related knowledge, patient well-being and compliance with treatment. As only 45 (36.0%) of the 125 recommendations were based on high-quality evidence, the guideline group formulated recommendations to guide future research with the aim of increasing the body of evidence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/dev177

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. 10.1093/humrep/der386 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.011 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/humrep/deq045 · DOI
  4. Beck, 1976, Assessment of depression: The depression inventory, Pharmacopsychiatria, 7, 151, 10.1159/000395074 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/0022-006X.70.2.433 · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.70.2.433 · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/humrep/ · doi:10.1093/humrep/
  7. 10.2217/whe.09.79 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3262 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/humrep/der171 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1080/00016340802460305 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/humrep/dep340 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1093/humrep/deq087 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/humrep/des402 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.04.032 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/humupd/dmq004 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1093/humrep/dei395 · DOI
  17. Dhaliwal, 2004, Psychological aspects of infertility due to various causes-prospective study, Int J Fertil Womens Med, 49, 44
  18. 10.1093/humrep/des307 · DOI
  19. 10.1348/135910700168982 · DOI
  20. 10.1186/1471-2393-13-88 · DOI
  21. Florian, 1990, Mental Health Inventory (MHI)-Psychometric properties and normative data in the Israeli population, Psychologia, 2, 26
  22. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.055 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/humupd/dms031 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.015 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/humupd/dms045 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/humrep/deu178 · DOI
  27. 10.2466/pr0.100.2.365-374 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/humupd/dmn030 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00537.x · DOI
  30. 10.1093/humrep/det421 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.080 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/00016340802705956 · DOI
  33. 10.3109/00016341003657892 · doi:10.3109/00016341003657892
  34. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.10.005 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/humrep/deq281 · DOI
  36. 10.1186/1471-244X-5-25 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/humrep/16.7.1382 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/1359105307074282 · DOI
  39. 10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.7 · DOI
  40. Kumbak, 2010, Psychologic influence of male factor infertility on men who are undergoing assisted reproductive treatment: a preliminary study in a Turkish population, J Reprod Med, 55, 417
  41. 10.1159/000228980 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s00737-012-0317-8 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/humrep/den491 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/02646830802350864 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03696.x · DOI
  46. 10.1093/humrep/der076 · DOI
  47. Montagnini, 2009, Emotional states of couples undergoing in vitro fertilization, Estudos de Psicologia, 26, 475, 10.1590/S0103-166X2009000400008 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01343.x · DOI
  49. 10.1111/j.1742-7924.2009.00119.x · DOI
  50. 10.1093/humrep/deq299 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00164-8 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.031 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.096 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00059.x · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.023 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1093/humrep/den067 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1093/humrep/det412 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1093/humrep/den463 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.053 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.034 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00374-8 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01775-7 · DOI
  63. 10.1007/s00404-012-2436-x · DOI
  64. 10.1093/humrep/deg149 · DOI
  65. 10.1007/s00737-009-0142-x · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.069 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1097/01.JNR.0000347636.95347.f8 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/humrep/12.1.183 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1080/1464727012000199611 · doi:10.1080/1464727012000199611
  70. 10.1093/humrep/deh882 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.197 · DOI
  72. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063743 · DOI
  73. 10.1093/humrep/deq030 · DOI
  74. 10.1093/humrep/des324 · DOI
  75. 10.1093/humrep/deq219 · DOI
  76. 10.1093/humrep/deq389 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61160-1 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01931-8 · DOI
  79. 10.1007/s10865-005-3667-0 · DOI
  80. 10.1093/humrep/dei015 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1093/humupd/dml040 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1093/humrep/del355 · DOI
  83. 10.1093/humrep/deq054 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1093/humrep/den427 · DOI
  85. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.008 · DOI
  86. 10.1093/humrep/des293 · DOI
  87. 10.1093/humrep/deq164 · DOI
  88. 10.4088/JCP.12m07805 · DOI

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
Gameiro, S., Boivin, J., Dancet, E., de Klerk, C., Emery, M., Lewis-Jones, C., Thorn, P., Van den Broeck, U., Venetis, C., Verhaak, C. M., Wischmann, T., & Vermeulen, N.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2015-09-07
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
2476-2485
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W1909241615
Cited by
346
References
5
FWCI
18.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Funders
ESHRE

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.