The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ESHRE guideline: routine psychosocial care in infertility and medically assisted reproduction—a guide for fertility staff: Figure 1
Open accessAbstract
STUDY QUESTION: Based on the best available evidence in the literature, what is the optimal management of routine psychosocial care at infertility and medically assisted reproduction (MAR) clinics? SUMMARY ANSWER: Using the structured methodology of the Manual for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Guideline Development, 120 recommendations were formulated that answered the 12 key questions on optimal management of routine psychosocial care by all fertility staff. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: The 2002 ESHRE Guidelines for counselling in infertility has been a reference point for best psychosocial care in infertility for years, but this guideline needed updating and did not focus on routine psychosocial care that can be delivered by all fertility staff. STUDY, DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This guideline was produced by a group of experts in the field according to the 12-step process described in the ESHRE Manual for Guideline Development. After scoping the guideline and listing a set of 12 key questions in PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome) format, thorough systematic searches of the literature were conducted; evidence from papers published until April 2014 was collected, evaluated for quality and analysed. A summary of evidence was written in a reply to each of the key questions and used as the basis for recommendations, which were defined by consensus within the guideline development group (GDG). Patient and additional clinical input was collected during the scoping and the review phase of the guideline development. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The guideline group, comprising psychologists, two medical doctors, a midwife, a patient representative and a methodological expert, met three times to discuss evidence and reach consensus on the recommendations. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE THE GUIDELINE PROVIDES: 120 recommendations that aim at guiding fertility clinic staff in providing optimal evidence-based routine psychosocial care to patients dealing with infertility and MAR. The guideline is written in two sections. The first section describes patients' preferences regarding the psychosocial care they would like to receive at clinics and how this care is associated with their well-being. The second section of the guideline provides information about the psychosocial needs patients experience across their treatment pathway (before, during and after treatment) and how fertility clinic staff can detect and address these. Needs refer to conditions assumed necessary for patients to have a healthy experience of the fertility treatment. Needs can be behavioural (lifestyle, exercise, nutrition and compliance), relational (relationship with partner if there is one, family friends and larger network, and work), emotional (well-being, e.g. anxiety, depression and quality of life) and cognitive (treatment concerns and knowledge). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We identified many areas in care for which robust evidence was lacking. Gaps in evidence were addressed by formulating good practice points, based on the expert opinion of the GDG, but it is critical for such recommendations to be empirically validated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The evidence presented in this guideline shows that providing routine psychosocial care is associated with or has potential to reduce stress and concerns about medical procedures and improve lifestyle outcomes, fertility-related knowledge, patient well-being and compliance with treatment. As only 45 (36.0%) of the 125 recommendations were based on high-quality evidence, the guideline group formulated recommendations to guide future research with the aim of increasing the body of evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment
THE WHOQOL GROUP (1998) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291798006667 · Cited by 7,933
Clark, A. M., Thornley, B., Tomlinson, L., Galletley, C., & Norman, R. J. (1998) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/13.6.1502 · Cited by 789
Volgsten, H., Skoog Svanberg, A., Ekselius, L., Lundkvist, O., & Sundstrom Poromaa, I. (2008) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/den154 · Cited by 303
Online psychoeducational support for infertile women: a randomized controlled trial
Cousineau, T. M., Green, T. C., Corsini, E., Seibring, A., Showstack, M. T., Applegarth, L., Davidson, M., & Perloe, M. (2008) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem306 · Cited by 127
Research works printed but not linked: 88
- 10.1093/humrep/der386 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.011 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deq045 · DOI
- Beck, 1976, Assessment of depression: The depression inventory, Pharmacopsychiatria, 7, 151, 10.1159/000395074 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-006X.70.2.433 · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.70.2.433 · Paper page
- 10.1093/humrep/ · doi:10.1093/humrep/
- 10.2217/whe.09.79 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3262 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/der171 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00016340802460305 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/dep340 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/humrep/deq087 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/des402 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.04.032 · DOI
- 10.1093/humupd/dmq004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/humrep/dei395 · DOI
- Dhaliwal, 2004, Psychological aspects of infertility due to various causes-prospective study, Int J Fertil Womens Med, 49, 44
- 10.1093/humrep/des307 · DOI
- 10.1348/135910700168982 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2393-13-88 · DOI
- Florian, 1990, Mental Health Inventory (MHI)-Psychometric properties and normative data in the Israeli population, Psychologia, 2, 26
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.055 · DOI
- 10.1093/humupd/dms031 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.015 · DOI
- 10.1093/humupd/dms045 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deu178 · DOI
- 10.2466/pr0.100.2.365-374 · DOI
- 10.1093/humupd/dmn030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00537.x · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/det421 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.080 · DOI
- 10.1080/00016340802705956 · DOI
- 10.3109/00016341003657892 · doi:10.3109/00016341003657892
- 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.10.005 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deq281 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-244X-5-25 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/16.7.1382 · DOI
- 10.1177/1359105307074282 · DOI
- 10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.7 · DOI
- Kumbak, 2010, Psychologic influence of male factor infertility on men who are undergoing assisted reproductive treatment: a preliminary study in a Turkish population, J Reprod Med, 55, 417
- 10.1159/000228980 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00737-012-0317-8 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/den491 · DOI
- 10.1080/02646830802350864 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03696.x · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/der076 · DOI
- Montagnini, 2009, Emotional states of couples undergoing in vitro fertilization, Estudos de Psicologia, 26, 475, 10.1590/S0103-166X2009000400008 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01343.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1742-7924.2009.00119.x · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deq299 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00164-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.031 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.096 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00059.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.023 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/humrep/den067 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/humrep/det412 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/humrep/den463 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.053 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.034 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00374-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01775-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00404-012-2436-x · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deg149 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00737-009-0142-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.069 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/01.JNR.0000347636.95347.f8 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/12.1.183 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/1464727012000199611 · doi:10.1080/1464727012000199611
- 10.1093/humrep/deh882 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.197 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0063743 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deq030 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/des324 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deq219 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deq389 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61160-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01931-8 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10865-005-3667-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/dei015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/humupd/dml040 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/humrep/del355 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deq054 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/humrep/den427 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.008 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/des293 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deq164 · DOI
- 10.4088/JCP.12m07805 · DOI
Cited by
Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them
Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & de Lacey, S. (2016) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dev334 · Cited by 1,259
Psychological problems related to infertility
Sharma, A., & Shrivastava, D. (2022) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.30320 · Cited by 147
Panth, N., Gavarkovs, A., Tamez, M., & Mattei, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00211 · Cited by 113
Dube, L., Bright, K., Hayden, K. A., & Gordon, J. L. (2023) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmac034 · Cited by 75
Bai, C.-F., Cui, N.-X., Xu, X., Mi, G.-L., Sun, J.-W., Shao, D., Li, J., Jiang, Y.-Z., Yang, Q.-Q., Zhang, X., et al. (2019) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dez066 · Cited by 65
Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility
Boedt, T., Vanhove, A.-C., Vercoe, M. A., Matthys, C., Dancet, E., & Lie Fong, S. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008189.pub3 · Cited by 66
Self-citationQuality of Life among Couples with a Fertility Related Diagnosis
Dourou, P., Gourounti, K., Lykeridou, A., Gaitanou, K., Petrogiannis, N., & Sarantaki, A. (2023) · Clinics and Practice · doi:10.3390/clinpract13010023 · Cited by 47
“Therefore, the need to measure and consider the quality of life in infertility is essential, and the use of reliable measurements could lead to better management of patients [7].”
BackgroundInfluentialSax, M. R., & Lawson, A. K. (2022) · Women · doi:10.3390/women2010008 · Cited by 44
Volmer, L., Rösner, S., Toth, B., Strowitzki, T., & Wischmann, T. (2017) · Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · doi:10.1055/s-0042-119200 · Cited by 40
Self-citationKremer, F., Ditzen, B., & Wischmann, T. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0282065 · Cited by 22
Self-citationRetractedRowbottom, B., Galhardo, A., Donovan, E., & Gameiro, S. (2022) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deac168 · Cited by 16
“Fertility clinics can now meet requirements to provide tailored support for patients ending treatment (Gameiro et al., 2015; HFEA, 2018) by signposting them to MyJourney.”
InfluentialSelf-citationFertility clinics have a duty of care towards patients who do not have children with treatment
Gameiro, S., Leone, D., & Mertes, H. (2024) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deae128 · Cited by 10
Self-citationPsychological Aspects of Infertility – Results from an Actor–Partner Interdependence Analysis
Thanscheidt, C. L., Pätsch, P., Rösner, S., Germeyer, A., Krause, M., Kentenich, H., Siercks, I., Häberlin, F., Ehrbar, V., Tschudin, S., et al. (2023) · Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · doi:10.1055/a-2041-2831 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gameiro, S., Boivin, J., Dancet, E., de Klerk, C., Emery, M., Lewis-Jones, C., Thorn, P., Van den Broeck, U., Venetis, C., Verhaak, C. M., Wischmann, T., & Vermeulen, N.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-09-07
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2476-2485
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W1909241615
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 18.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Funders
- ESHRE
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.