Cited by 81Ovarian function and disordersReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

Metformin versus clomiphene citrate for infertility in non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Misso, M. L., Costello, M. F., Garrubba, M., Wong, J., Hart, R., Rombauts, L., Melder, A. M., Norman, R. J. +1 more·2013·Human Reproduction Update

Abstract

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND Recent studies suggest that metformin may be more effective in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who are non-obese. The objective here is to determine and compare the effectiveness of metformin and clomiphene citrate for improving fertility outcomes in women with PCOS and a BMI < 32 kg/m(2) (BMI 32 kg/m(2) was used to allow for international differences in BMI values which determine access to infertility therapy through the public health system). METHODS Databases were searched for English language articles until July 2011. INCLUSION CRITERIA: women of any age, ethnicity and weight with PCOS diagnosed by all current criteria, who are infertile; at least 1000 mg of any type of metformin at any frequency, including slow release and standard release, compared with any type, dose and frequency of clomiphene citrate. OUTCOMES: rates of ovulation, live birth, pregnancy, multiple pregnancies, miscarriage, adverse events, quality of life and cost effectiveness. Data were extracted and risk of bias assessed. A random effects model was used for meta-analyses of data, using risk ratios (relative risk). RESULTS The search returned 4981 articles, 580 articles addressed metformin or clomiphene citrate and four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing metformin with clomiphene citrate were included. Upon meta-analysis of the four RCTs, we were unable to detect a statistically significant difference between the two interventions for any outcome in women with PCOS and a BMI < 32 kg/m(2), owing to significant heterogeneity across the RCTs. CONCLUSIONS Owing to conflicting findings and heterogeneity across the included RCTs, there is insufficient evidence to establish a difference between metformin and clomiphene citrate in terms of ovulation, pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates in women with PCOS and a BMI < 32 kg/m(2). However, a lack of superiority of one treatment is not evidence for equivalence, and further methodologically rigorous trials are required to determine whether there is a difference in effectiveness between metformin and placebo (or no treatment) or between metformin and clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in women with PCOS who are non-obese. Until then, caution should be exercised when prescribing metformin as first line pharmacological therapy in this group of women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humupd/dms036

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Misso, M. L., Costello, M. F., Garrubba, M., Wong, J., Hart, R., Rombauts, L., Melder, A. M., Norman, R. J., & Teede, H. J.
Affiliations
  • Jean Hailes (AU)
  • Royal Hospital for Women (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Teede, H. J.
Venue
Human Reproduction Update
Published
2012-09-06
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
2-11
ISSN
  • 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2369
OpenAlex
W2147077059
Cited by
81
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Reproduction Update (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
metformin, clomiphene citrate, polycystic ovary syndrome, female infertility, ovulation induction, non-obese women, live birth rate, pregnancy rate, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, cost-effectiveness, quality of life, adverse events, treatment equivalence
MeSH terms
Clomiphene, Female, Fertility Agents, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Infertility, Female, Metformin, Obesity, Ovulation, Ovulation Induction, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Pregnancy, Body Mass Index, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pregnancy Rate, Live Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review