Cited by 1,018Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisMonetary Policy and Economic Impact

Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogeneous Explanatory Variable is Weak

Bound, John, Jaeger, David A., Baker, Regina M.·1995·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

John Bound, David A. Jaeger, Regina M. Baker, Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogeneous Explanatory Variable is Weak, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 90, No. 430 (Jun., 1995), pp. 443-450

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2291055

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., & Baker, R. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995-06
Volume
90
Issue
430
Pages
443
ISSN
0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4238040836
Cited by
1,018
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 42
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Keywords
instrumental variable estimation, weak instruments, endogeneity, estimation bias, finite sample properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review