Cited by 319Nutritional Studies and DietConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutrition, Health, and Society Studies

An Index of Diet and Eating Patterns Is a Valid Measure of Diet Quality in an Australian Population1,

Open access
McNaughton, Sarah A., Ball, Kylie, Crawford, David, Mishra, Gita D.·2008·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Diet indices represent an integrated approach to assessing eating patterns and behaviors. The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive food-based dietary index to reflect adherence to healthy eating recommendations, evaluate the construct validity of the index using nutrient intakes, and evaluate this index in relation to sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, risk factors, and self-assessed health status. Data were analyzed from adult participants of the Australian National Nutrition Survey who completed a 108-item FFQ and a food habits questionnaire (n = 8220). The dietary guideline index (DGI) consisted of 15 items reflecting the dietary guidelines, including dietary indicators of vegetables and legumes, fruit, total cereals, meat and alternatives, total dairy, beverages, sodium, saturated fat, alcoholic beverages, and added sugars. Diet quality was incorporated using indicators relating to whole-grain cereals, lean meat, reduced/low fat dairy, and dietary variety. We investigated associations between the DGI score, sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, chronic disease risk factors, and nutrient intakes. We found associations between the DGI scores and sex, age, income, area-level socioeconomic disadvantage, smoking, physical activity, waist:hip ratio, systolic blood pressure (males only), and self-assessed health status (females only) (all P < 0.05). Higher DGI scores were associated with lower intakes of energy, total fat, and saturated fat and higher intakes of fiber, beta-carotene, vitamin C, folate, calcium, and iron (P < 0.05). This food-based dietary index is able to discriminate across a variety of sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, and self-assessed health and reflects intakes of key nutrients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/138.1.86

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both depressive and anxiety disorders contribute to weight gain.

    “both depressive and anxiety disorders were found to contribute to weight gain (McNaughton et al., 2008; Strine et al., 2008; Kivimaki et al., 2009)”

    From The Mediating Role of Psychological Inflexibility in the Relationship Between Anxiety, Depression, and Emotional Eating in Adult Individuals With Obesity (2022) · cites this paper as McNaughton et al., 2008

    The Discussion (page unavailable) addresses diet quality, BMI and self-reported health, but does not discuss depressive or anxiety disorders as contributors to weight gain. A search of our copy for depressive and anxiety disorders and related mental-health terms found no passage supporting that claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNaughton, S. A., Ball, K., Crawford, D., & Mishra, G. D.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
McNaughton, Sarah A.
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
138
Issue
1
Pages
86-93
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100295769
Cited by
319
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Keywords
dietary index, diet quality, dietary guidelines, construct validity, nutrient intake, dietary habits, sociodemographic factors, health behavior, chronic disease risk factors, self-rated health, food frequency questionnaire, dietary diversity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Australia, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Nutrition Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review