Cited by 133Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthDiabetes Management and Research

The Ketogenic Diet: Evidence for Optimism but High-Quality Research Needed

Open access
Ludwig, David S·2020·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

For >50 y, dietary guidelines in the United States have focused on reducing intakes of saturated and total fat. However, rates of obesity and diabetes rose markedly throughout this period, with potentially catastrophic implications for public health and the economy. Recently, ketogenic diets have received substantial attention from the general public and nutrition research community. These very-low-carbohydrate diets, with fat comprising >70% of calories, have been dismissed as fads. However, they have a long history in clinical medicine and human evolution. Ketogenic diets appear to be more effective than low-fat diets for treatment of obesity and diabetes. In addition to the reductions in blood glucose and insulin achievable through carbohydrate restriction, chronic ketosis might confer unique metabolic benefits of relevance to cancer, neurodegenerative conditions, and other diseases associated with insulin resistance. Based on available evidence, a well-formulated ketogenic diet does not appear to have major safety concerns for the general public and can be considered a first-line approach for obesity and diabetes. High-quality clinical trials of ketogenic diets will be needed to assess important questions about their long-term effects and full potential in clinical medicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/nxz308

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ludwig, D. S.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Ludwig, David S
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
150
Issue
6
Pages
1354-1359
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995506097
Cited by
133
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 13
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
ketogenic diet, very low carbohydrate diet, obesity, type 2 diabetes, carbohydrate restriction, insulin resistance, blood glucose, dietary fat, low-fat diet, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, diet safety, dietary guidelines
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Dietary Carbohydrates, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Obesity, Research, Weight Loss, Nutrition Policy, Diet, Ketogenic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review