Cited by 446Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCerebrovascular and genetic disorders

Two Types of Sporadic Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy

Thal, Dietmar Rudolf, Ghebremedhin, Estifanos, Rüb, Udo, Yamaguchi, Haruyasu, Del Tredici, Kelly, Braak, Heiko·2002·Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a type of beta-amyloidosis that occurs in leptomeningeal and cortical vessels of the elderly. In a sample of 41 CAA cases including 16 Alzheimer disease (AD) cases and 28 controls, we show that 2 types of sporadic CAA exist: The first type is characterized by immunohistochemically detectable amyloid beta-protein (Abeta) in cortical capillaries, leptomeningeal and cortical arteries, arterioles, veins, and venules. It is referred to here as CAA-Type 1. The second type of CAA also exhibits immunohistochemically detectable Abeta deposits in leptomeningeal and cortical vessels, with the exception of cortical capillaries. This type is termed CAA-Type 2. In cases with CAA-Type 1, the frequency of the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) epsilon4 allele is more than 4 times greater than in CAA-Type 2 cases and in controls. CAA-Type 2 cases have a higher epsilon2 allele frequency than CAA-Type 1 cases and controls. The ratio of CAA-Type 2 to CAA-Type 1 cases does not shift significantly with respect to the severity of AD-related beta-amyloidosis, with respect to degrees of CAA-severity, or with increasing age. Therefore, CAA-Type 1 is unlikely to be the late stage of CAA-Type 2; rather, they represent 2 different entities. Since both the ApoE epsilon2 and the epsilon4 allele are known to be risk factors for CAA, we can assign the risk factor ApoE epsilon4 to a distinct morphological type of CAA. The ApoE epsilon4 allele constitutes a risk factor for CAA-Type 1…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnen/61.3.282

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Type 2 cerebral amyloid angiopathy affects arterioles and small arteries, but not capillaries, and is 2-times more likely to be associated with APOE2.

    “Type 2 CAA affects arterioles and small arteries, but not capillaries and is 2-times more likely to associated with APOE2 [47, 48].”

    From The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (2019) · cites this paper as [47]

  • Type 1 cerebral amyloid angiopathy affects capillaries, arterioles and small arteries and is 4-times more likely to be associated with APOE4.

    “Type 1 CAA affects capillaries, arterioles and small arteries and it is 4-times more likely to be associated with APOE4.”

    From The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (2019) · cites this paper as [47]

  • The largest percentage of AD patients with both CAA and CCA was found among ε4 allele carriers, while CAA without CCA was more frequent among ε2 and ε3 carriers.

    “The largest percentage of AD patients with both CAA and CCA was found among ε4 allele carriers, while CAA without CCA was more frequent among ε2 and ε3 carriers [40, 42].”
  • In these studies ε3 allele carriers and in particular ε3 allele homozygotes constituted the largest percentage among CAA/CCA free cases.

    “In these studies ε3 allele carriers and in particular ε3 allele homozygotes constituted the largest percentage among CAA/CCA free cases.”
  • Both CAA and CCA variants of VAβ pathology have been described in AD autopsies and their relative preponderance has been linked to various APOE genotypes.

    “Both CAA and CCA variants of VAβ pathology have been described in AD autopsies and their relative preponderance has been linked to various APOE genotypes [40–43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thal, D. R., Ghebremedhin, E., Rüb, U., Yamaguchi, H., Del Tredici, K., & Braak, H.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Thal, Dietmar Rudolf
Venue
Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
Published
2002-03
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
282-293
ISSN
  • 0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6578
OpenAlex
W2463189234
Cited by
446
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Keywords
cerebral amyloid angiopathy, sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy, amyloid-beta deposition, APOE ε4, Alzheimer's disease, vascular amyloid, leptomeningeal vessels, immunohistochemistry, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloidosis, Apolipoproteins E, Blood Vessels, Brain Diseases, Capillaries, Cerebral Infarction, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Female, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Severity of Illness Index, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review