Cited by 20Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

The diversity of the circumgalactic medium around z = 0 Milky Way-mass galaxies from the Auriga simulations

Open access
Hani, Maan H, Ellison, Sara L, Sparre, Martin, Grand, Robert J J, Pakmor, Rüediger, Gomez, Facundo A, Springel, Volker·2019·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Galaxies are surrounded by massive gas reservoirs (i.e. the circumgalactic medium; CGM) which play a key role in their evolution. The properties of the CGM, which are dependent on a variety of internal and environmental factors, are often inferred from absorption line surveys which rely on a limited number of single lines-of-sight. In this work we present an analysis of 28 galaxy haloes selected from the Auriga project, a cosmological magneto-hydrodynamical zoom-in simulation suite of isolated Milky Way-mass galaxies, to understand the impact of CGM diversity on observational studies. Although the Auriga haloes are selected to populate a narrow range in halo mass, our work demonstrates that the CGM of L⋆ galaxies is extremely diverse: column densities of commonly observed species span ∼3 − 4 dex and their covering fractions range from ${\sim } 5$ to $90{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$. Despite this diversity, we identify the following correlations: 1) the covering fractions (CF) of hydrogen and metals of the Auriga haloes positively correlate with stellar mass, 2) the CF of H i, C iv, and Si ii anticorrelate with active galactic nucleus luminosity due to ionization effects, and 3) the CF of H i, C iv, and Si ii positively correlate with galaxy disc fraction due to outflows populating the CGM with cool and dense gas. The Auriga sample demonstrates striking diversity within the CGM of L⋆ galaxies, which poses a challenge for observations reconstructing CGM characteristics from limited samples, and also indicates that long-term merger assembly history and recent star formation are not the dominant sculptors of the CGM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stz1708

Cites

183 of 183 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is significant halo-to-halo scatter in the CGM distributions around MW-mass galaxies, but the median distribution shows good agreement between the three simulations.

    “We find significant haloto-halo scatter, which is indicative of the diversity of CGM distributions around MW-mass galaxies (Hani et al. 2019; Davies et al. 2020), but the median distribution shows good agreement between the three simulations.”

    From The milky way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2 (2020) · cites this paper as Hani et al. 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Corlies L., Peeples M. S., Tumlinson J., O'Shea B. W., Lehner N., Howk J. C., O'Meara J. M., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1811.05060 ) · arXiv
  2. Forbes J. C., Lin D. N. C., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1810.12925 ) · arXiv
  3. Uldall Fynbo J. P., 2019, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1901.10777 · arXiv
  4. Werk J. K., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1904.11014 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hani, M. H., Ellison, S. L., Sparre, M., Grand, R. J. J., Pakmor, R., Gomez, F. A., & Springel, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE)
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85741 Garching, Germany
  • Instituto de Investigación Multidisciplinar en Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad de La Serena, Raúl Bitrán 1305 La Serena, Chile
Corresponding author
Hani, Maan H
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2019-06-21
Volume
488
Issue
1
Pages
135-152
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2951417996
Cited by
20
References
183
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) (submittedVersion)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Research Council (CRAGSMAN-646955)
  • Consejo Nacional de Innovación, Ciencia y Tecnología
  • Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
  • Max Planck Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
circumgalactic medium, Milky Way-mass galaxies, Auriga simulations, covering fraction, column density, metals, C IV, Si II, active galactic nuclei, galactic outflows, stellar mass, galaxy evolution, zoom-in simulations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review