Cited by 10Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Predicting gene expression from histone marks using chromatin deep learning models depends on histone mark function, regulatory distance and cellular states

Open access
Murphy, Alan E, Askarova, Aydan, Lenhard, Boris, Skene, Nathan G, Marzi, Sarah J·2025·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

To understand the complex relationship between histone mark activity and gene expression, recent advances have used in silico predictions based on large-scale machine learning models. However, these approaches have omitted key contributing factors like cell state, histone mark function or distal effects, which impact the relationship, limiting their findings. Moreover, downstream use of these models for new biological insight is lacking. Here, we present the most comprehensive study of this relationship to date – investigating seven histone marks in eleven cell types across a diverse range of cell states. We used convolutional and attention-based models to predict transcription from histone mark activity at promoters and distal regulatory elements. Our work shows that histone mark function, genomic distance and cellular states collectively influence a histone mark’s relationship with transcription. We found that no individual histone mark is consistently the strongest predictor of gene expression across all genomic and cellular contexts. This highlights the need to consider all three factors when determining the effect of histone mark activity on transcriptional state. Furthermore, we conducted in silico histone mark perturbation assays, uncovering functional and disease related loci and highlighting frameworks for the use of chromatin deep learning models to uncover new biological insight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkae1212

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, A. E., Askarova, A., Lenhard, B., Skene, N. G., & Marzi, S. J.
Affiliations
  • UK Dementia Research Institute (GB)
  • MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Murphy, Alan E
  • Marzi, Sarah J
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2024-12-11
Volume
53
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W4405296620
Cited by
10
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • UK Dementia Research Institute (UKDRI-5008, UKDRI-6009)
  • Medical Research Council
  • Edmond and Lily Safra Early Career Fellowship Program
  • UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/T04327X/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
histone modifications, gene expression prediction, regulatory distance, cell states, transcription, distal regulatory elements, promoter, attention-based models, convolutional neural networks
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Chromatin, Gene Expression Regulation, Histones, Humans, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription, Genetic, Histone Code

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review