Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 740

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phospho.ELM: a database of phosphorylation sites--update 2011

Open access
Dinkel, H., Chica, C., Via, A., Gould, C. M., Jensen, L. J., Gibson, T. J., Diella, F.·2011·Nucleic Acids Research
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkq1104
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Phospho.ELM resource (http://phospho.elm.eu.org) is a relational database designed to store in vivo and in vitro phosphorylation data extracted from the scientific literature and phosphoproteomic analyses. The resource has been actively developed for more than 7 years and currently comprises 42,574 serine, threonine and tyrosine non-redundant phosphorylation sites. Several new features have been implemented, such as structural disorder/order and accessibility information and a conservation score. Additionally, the conservation of the phosphosites can now be visualized directly on the multiple sequence alignment used for the score calculation. Finally, special emphasis has been put on linking to external resources such as interaction networks and other databases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkq1104

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Cantin, 2008, Journal of proteome research, 7, 1346, 10.1021/pr0705441 · DOI
  2. Mann, 2002, Trends in biotechnology, 20, 261, 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01944-3 · DOI
  3. 2004, PNAS, 101, 12130, 10.1073/pnas.0404720101 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 3, 1093, 10.1074/mcp.M400085-MCP200 · DOI
  5. Lemeer, 2009, Current opinion in chemical biology, 13, 414, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.06.022 · DOI
  6. Kitano, 2007, Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 6, 202, 10.1038/nrd2195 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Feller, 2010, 8, 7, 10.1186/1478-811X-8-7 · DOI
  8. Whitty, 2008, 4, 435, 10.1038/nchembio0808-435 · DOI
  9. Smock, 2009, Science, 324, 198, 10.1126/science.1169377 · DOI
  10. Tan, 2009, Science Signaling, 2, ra39, 10.1126/scisignal.2000316 · DOI
  11. Gibson, 2009, Trends in biochemical sciences, 34, 471, 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.06.007 · DOI
  12. Jorgensen, 2010, Current opinion in genetics & development, 20, 15, 10.1016/j.gde.2009.12.003 · DOI
  13. Breitkreutz, 2010, Science, 328, 1043, 10.1126/science.1176495 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Preisinger, 2008, Proteomics, 8, 4402, 10.1002/pmic.200800136 · DOI
  15. de la Fuente van Bentem, 2008, Proteomics, 8, 4453, 10.1002/pmic.200800175 · DOI
  16. Morandell, 2008, Proteomics, 8, 4383, 10.1002/pmic.200800204 · DOI
  17. Linding, 2007, Cell, 129, 1415, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.052 · DOI
  18. Brown, 2002, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 55, 104, 10.1007/s00239-001-2309-6 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Boekhorst, 2008, Genome biology, 9, R144, 10.1186/gb-2008-9-10-r144 · DOI
  20. Lienhard, 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences, 33, 351, 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.05.004 · DOI
  21. 2009, Science, 325, 1686, 10.1126/science.1174301 · DOI
  22. Holt, 2009, Science, 325, 1682, 10.1126/science.1172867 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Diella, 2004, BMC bioinformatics [electronic resource], 5, 79, 10.1186/1471-2105-5-79 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2008, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, D240, 10.1093/nar/gkm772 · DOI
  25. 2010, Nucleic Acids Research, 38, D142, 10.1093/nar/gkp846 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 2010, Nucleic Acids Research, 38, D557, 10.1093/nar/gkp972 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2010, Nucleic Acids Research, 38, D167, 10.1093/nar/gkp1016 · DOI
  28. 2008, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, D695, 10.1093/nar/gkm902 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 2010, Nucleic Acids Research, 38, D532, 10.1093/nar/gkp983 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2009, Nucleic Acids Research, 37, D412, 10.1093/nar/gkn760 · DOI
  31. Chica, 2008, BMC bioinformatics [electronic resource], 9, 229, 10.1186/1471-2105-9-229 · DOI
  32. 2009, Bioinformatics, 25, 1189, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Iakoucheva, 2004, Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 1037, 10.1093/nar/gkh253 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2011, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library, 16, 1261, 10.2741/3787 · DOI
  35. Berman, 2000, Nucleic Acids Research, 28, 235, 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Miller, 1987, Journal of molecular biology, 196, 641, 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90038-6 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 2007, Nucleic Acids Research, 35, D229, 10.1093/nar/gkl922 · DOI
  38. 2010, Nucleic Acids Research, 38, D308, 10.1093/nar/gkp916 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Dor, 2007, Proteins, 68, 76, 10.1002/prot.21408 · DOI
  40. 2009, Nucleic Acids Research, 37, D229, 10.1093/nar/gkn808 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2005, Bioinformatics, 21, 3433, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti541 · DOI
  42. 2002, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277, 39379, 10.1074/jbc.M206399200 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2009, Nucleic Acids Research, 37, D767, 10.1093/nar/gkn892 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Hornbeck, 2004, Proteomics, 4, 1551, 10.1002/pmic.200300772 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Gnad, 2007, Genome biology, 8, R250, 10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r250 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Bodenmiller, 2008, Nature biotechnology, 26, 1339, 10.1038/nbt1208-1339 · DOI
  47. 2009, Nucleic Acids Research, 37, D960, 10.1093/nar/gkn733 · DOI
  48. Xue, 2010, Current protein & peptide science, 11, 485, 10.2174/138920310791824138 · DOI
  49. Remington, 2006, Current opinion in structural biology, 16, 676, 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.10.008 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dinkel, H., Chica, C., Via, A., Gould, C. M., Jensen, L. J., Gibson, T. J., & Diella, F.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2010-11-09
Volume
39
Issue
Database
Pages
D261-D267
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
DOI
10.1093/nar/gkq1104
OpenAlex
W2162172965
Cited by
740
References
2
FWCI
25.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5 (vor, 2197 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.