Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,713

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures

Open access
Marchler-Bauer, Aron, Bo, Yu, Han, Lianyi, He, Jane, Lanczycki, Christopher J., Lu, Shennan, Chitsaz, Farideh, Derbyshire, Myra K., Geer, Renata C., Gonzales, Noreen R., Gwadz, Marc, Hurwitz, David I., Lu, Fu, Marchler, Gabriele H., Song, James S., Thanki, Narmada, Wang, Zhouxi, Yamashita, Roxanne A., Zhang, Dachuan, Zheng, Chanjuan, Geer, Lewis Y., Bryant, Stephen H.·2017·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

NCBI's Conserved Domain Database (CDD) aims at annotating biomolecular sequences with the location of evolutionarily conserved protein domain footprints, and functional sites inferred from such footprints. An archive of pre-computed domain annotation is maintained for proteins tracked by NCBI's Entrez database, and live search services are offered as well. CDD curation staff supplements a comprehensive collection of protein domain and protein family models, which have been imported from external providers, with representations of selected domain families that are curated in-house and organized into hierarchical classifications of functionally distinct families and sub-families. CDD also supports comparative analyses of protein families via conserved domain architectures, and a recent curation effort focuses on providing functional characterizations of distinct subfamily architectures using SPARCLE: Subfamily Protein Architecture Labeling Engine. CDD can be accessed at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/cdd.shtml.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkw1129

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1093/nar/gkv1344 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Letunic, 2014, SMART: recent updates, new developments, and status in 2015, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D257, 10.1093/nar/gku949 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/nar/29.1.22 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/nar/gks1234 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1093/nar/gkn734 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/nar/gku1221 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/nar/gkh454 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Finn R. Attwood T. Babbitt P. Bateman A. Bork P. Bridge A. Chang H.-Y. Dosztányi Z. El-Gebali S. Fraser M. . InterPro in 2017: beyond protein family and domain annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1107. · DOI
  9. 10.1101/gr.278202 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Marchler-Bauer, A., Bo, Y., Han, L., He, J., Lanczycki, C. J., Lu, S., Chitsaz, F., Derbyshire, M. K., Geer, R. C., Gonzales, N. R., Gwadz, M., Hurwitz, D. I., Lu, F., Marchler, G. H., Song, J. S., Thanki, N., Wang, Z., Yamashita, R. A., Zhang, D., Zheng, C., Geer, L. Y., & Bryant, S. H.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2016-11-29
Volume
45
Issue
D1
Pages
D200-D203
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2559191318
Cited by
2,713
References
0
FWCI
127.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.