The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Novel phylogenetic methods are needed for understanding gene function in the era of mega-scale genome sequencing
Abstract
Ongoing large-scale genome sequencing projects are forecasting a data deluge that will almost certainly overwhelm current analytical capabilities of evolutionary genomics. In contrast to population genomics, there are no standardized methods in evolutionary genomics for extracting evolutionary and functional (e.g. gene-trait association) signal from genomic data. Here, we examine how current practices of multi-species comparative genomics perform in this aspect and point out that many genomic datasets are under-utilized due to the lack of powerful methodologies. As a result, many current analyses emphasize gene families for which some functional data is already available, resulting in a growing gap between functionally well-characterized genes/organisms and the universe of unknowns. This leaves unknown genes on the ‘dark side’ of genomes, a problem that will not be mitigated by sequencing more and more genomes, unless we develop tools to infer functional hypotheses for unknown genes in a systematic manner. We provide an inventory of recently developed methods capable of predicting gene-gene and gene-trait associations based on comparative data, then argue that realizing the full potential of whole genome datasets requires the integration of phylogenetic comparative methods into genomics, a rich but underutilized toolbox for looking into the past.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For simple traits with easily quantifiable phenotypes and a simple genetic basis, PhyloG2P studies will have a chance to identify specific genotype-to-phenotype maps.
“On one end, we can conceptualize “simple” traits with both easily quantifiable phenotypes and a simple genetic basis. Here PhyloG2P studies will have a chance to identify specific genotype to phenotype maps (Lamichhaney et al. 2019; Nagy et al. 2020; Okuyama et al. 2025).”
From From Trees to Traits: A Review of Advances in PhyloG2P Methods and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as Nagy et al. 2020
Utilizing replicated evolution provides a key advantage for discovering genotype-to-phenotype relationships even in genomic regions with no prior functional characterization.
“It has also been noted that utilizing replicated evolution provides a key advantage for discovering genotype to phenotype relationships, even in genomic regions with no prior functional characterization (Nagy et al. 2020).”
From From Trees to Traits: A Review of Advances in PhyloG2P Methods and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as Nagy et al. 2020
The evolutionary perspective of PhyloG2P enables genotype to phenotype mapping in situations where typical population genetics approaches would be challenging, if not impossible to implement.
“This evolutionary perspective enables genotype to phenotype mapping in situations where typical population genetics approaches would be challenging, if not impossible to implement (Nagy et al. 2020; Smith et al. 2020).”
From From Trees to Traits: A Review of Advances in PhyloG2P Methods and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as Nagy et al. 2020
As sequenced genomes rapidly increased in availability over the past 20 years, it became clear that there was a need for statistical analysis methods that could be applied genome-wide while maintaining low error rates.
“However, as sequenced genomes rapidly increased in availability over the past 20 years, it became clear that there was a need for statistical analysis methods that could be applied genome-wide while maintaining low error rates (Nagy et al. 2020).”
From From Trees to Traits: A Review of Advances in PhyloG2P Methods and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as Nagy et al. 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics
Emms, D. M., & Kelly, S. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y · Cited by 7,676
Functional and evolutionary implications of gene orthology
Gabaldón, T., & Koonin, E. V. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3456 · Cited by 643
Phylogenomics reveals three sources of adaptive variation during a rapid radiation
Pease, J. B., Haak, D. C., Hahn, M. W., & Moyle, L. C. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002379 · Cited by 432
Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods
Uyeda, J. C., Zenil-Ferguson, R., & Pennell, M. W. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy031 · Cited by 313
Large-scale investigation of the reasons why potentially important genes are ignored
Stoeger, T., Gerlach, M., Morimoto, R. I., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006643 · Cited by 261
Fueling the future with fungal genomics
Grigoriev, I. V., Cullen, D., Goodwin, S. B., Hibbett, D., Jeffries, T. W., Kubicek, C. P., Kuske, C., Magnuson, J. K., Martin, F., Spatafora, J. W., et al. (2011) · Mycology · doi:10.1080/21501203.2011.584577 · Cited by 250
A genomics approach reveals insights into the importance of gene losses for mammalian adaptations
Sharma, V., Hecker, N., Roscito, J. G., Foerster, L., Langer, B. E., & Hiller, M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03667-1 · Cited by 237
The hidden biology of sponges and ctenophores
Dunn, C. W., Leys, S. P., & Haddock, S. H. D. (2015) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.03.003 · Cited by 212
Promises, promises, and precision medicine
Joyner, M. J., & Paneth, N. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci126119 · Cited by 171
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 111
- Sibbald, 2017, More protist genomes needed, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 1, 145, 10.1038/s41559-017-0145 · DOI
- Spang, 2018, Asgard archaea are the closest prokaryotic relatives of eukaryotes, PLoS Genet., 14, e1007080, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007080 · DOI
- Lax, 2018, Hemimastigophora is a novel supra-kingdom-level lineage of eukaryotes, Nature, 564, 410, 10.1038/s41586-018-0708-8 · DOI
- Strassert, 2018, New phylogenomic analysis of the enigmatic phylum Telonemia further resolves the eukaryote tree of life, Mol. Biol. Evol., 36, 757, 10.1093/molbev/msz012 · DOI · Paper page
- Strassert, 2018, Single cell genomics of uncultured marine alveolates shows paraphyly of basal dinoflagellates, ISME J., 12, 304, 10.1038/ismej.2017.167 · DOI
- Lewin, 2018, Earth BioGenome Project: sequencing life for the future of life, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 115, 4325, 10.1073/pnas.1720115115 · DOI · Paper page
- Cheng, 2018, 10KP: A phylodiverse genome sequencing plan, Gigascience., 7, 1, 10.1093/gigascience/giy013 · DOI · Paper page
- Twyford, 2018, The road to 10,000 plant genomes, Nat. Plants, 4, 312, 10.1038/s41477-018-0165-2 · DOI
- Normile, 2017, Plant scientists plan massive effort to sequence 10,000 genomes, Science
- Stajich, 2017, Fungal genomes and insights into the evolution of the kingdom, 619, 10.1128/9781555819583.ch29 · DOI · Paper page
- Koepfli, 2015, The genome 10K Project: a way forward, Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci., 3, 57, 10.1146/annurev-animal-090414-014900 · DOI · Paper page
- Haussler, 2009, Genome 10K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10000 vertebrate species, J. Hered., 100, 659, 10.1093/jhered/esp086 · DOI
- Zhang, 2015, Genomics: bird sequencing project takes off, Nature, 522, 34, 10.1038/522034d · DOI
- Evans, 2013, The i5K initiative: advancing arthropod genomics for knowledge, human health, agriculture, and the environment, J. Hered., 104, 595, 10.1093/jhered/est050 · DOI
- Levine, 2011, i5k: The 5,000 insect genome project, Am. Entomol, 57, 110, 10.1093/ae/57.2.110 · DOI
- Robinson, 2011, Creating a buzz about insect genomes, Science, 331, 1386, 10.1126/science.331.6023.1386 · DOI
- Nordberg, 2014, The genome portal of the Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute: 2014; updates, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D26, 10.1093/nar/gkt1069 · DOI
- Grigoriev, 2014, MycoCosm portal: Gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D699, 10.1093/nar/gkt1183 · DOI · Paper page
- Eisen, 1998, Phylogenomics: improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis, Genome Res., 8, 163, 10.1101/gr.8.3.163 · DOI
- Dunn, 2016, Comparative genomics and the diversity of life, Zool. Scr., 45, 5, 10.1111/zsc.12211 · DOI
- Collins, 1999, Shattuck lecture—medical and societal consequences of the human genome project, N. Engl. J. Med., 341, 28, 10.1056/NEJM199907013410106 · DOI
- Liggett, 2001, Pharmacogenetic applications of the human genome project, Nat. Med., 7, 281, 10.1038/85411 · DOI
- Gordon, 1989, The Human Genome Project promises insights into aging, Geriatrics, 44, 89
- Shendure, 2019, Genomic medicine–progress, pitfalls, and promise, Cell, 177, 45, 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.003 · DOI
- Wade, 2010, A Decade Later, Genetic Map Yields Few New Cures
- Taylor, 2011, The human genome project, 10 years in: Did they oversell the revolution?, The Globe and Mail
- Cook, 2016, The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2016: data growth and integration, Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D20, 10.1093/nar/gkv1352 · DOI
- Alföldi, 2013, Comparative genomics as a tool to understand evolution and disease, Genome Res., 23, 1063, 10.1101/gr.157503.113 · DOI
- Bolker, 2012, Model organisms: there's more to life than rats and flies, Nature, 491, 31, 10.1038/491031a · DOI
- Horan, 2008, Annotating genes of known and unknown function by large-scale coexpression analysis, Plant Physiol., 147, 41, 10.1104/pp.108.117366 · DOI
- Heller, 2009, Charting an unknown protein universe, PLoS Biol., 7, e1000206, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000206 · DOI
- Jaroszewski, 2009, Exploration of uncharted regions of the protein universe, PLoS Biol., 7, e1000205, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000205 · DOI
- Johnson, 2018, Adaptation and conservation insights from the koala genome, Nat. Genet., 50, 1102, 10.1038/s41588-018-0153-5 · DOI
- Werck-reichhart, 2000, Protein family review Cytochromes P450: a success story, Genome Biol., 1, 10.1186/gb-2000-1-6-reviews3003 · DOI
- Floudas, 2012, The paleozoic origin of enzymatic lignin decomposition reconstructed from 31 fungal genomes, Science, 336, 1715, 10.1126/science.1221748 · DOI
- Altenhoff, 2018, The OMA orthology database in 2018: Retrieving evolutionary relationships among all domains of life through richer web and programmatic interfaces, Nucleic Acids Res., 46, D477, 10.1093/nar/gkx1019 · DOI · Paper page
- Nagy, 2014, Latent homology and convergent regulatory evolution underlies the repeated emergence of yeasts, Nat. Commun., 5, 4471, 10.1038/ncomms5471 · DOI
- Tam, 2019, Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies, Nat. Rev. Genet., 20, 467, 10.1038/s41576-019-0127-1 · DOI
- Visscher, 2017, 10 years of GWAS discovery: biology, function, and translation, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 101, 5, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Sella, 2019, Thinking about the evolution of complex traits in the era of genome-wide association studies, Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet., 20, 461, 10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022316 · DOI
- Collins, 2018, A phylogenetic method to perform genome-wide association studies in microbes that accounts for population structure and recombination, PLoS Comput. Biol., 14, e1005958, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005958 · DOI
- Pagel, 1999, Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution, Nature, 401, 877, 10.1038/44766 · DOI · Paper page
- Barker, 2005, Predicting functional gene links from phylogenetic-statistical analyses of whole genomes, PLoS Comput. Biol., 1, e3, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010003 · DOI
- Barker, 2007, Constrained models of evolution lead to improved prediction of functional linkage from correlated gain and loss of genes, Bioinformatics, 23, 14, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl558 · DOI
- Pellegrini, 1999, Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96, 4285, 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4285 · DOI
- Pellegrini, 2012, Using phylogenetic profiles to predict functional relationships, Methods Mol. Biol., 804, 167, 10.1007/978-1-61779-361-5_9 · DOI
- Dey, 2015, Phylogenetic profiling for probing the modular architecture of the human genome, Cell Syst., 1, P105
- Dey, 2015, Systematic discovery of human gene function and principles of modular organization through phylogenetic profiling, Cell Rep., 10, 993, 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.025 · DOI
- Nagy, 2017, Genetic bases of fungal white rot wood decay predicted by phylogenomic analysis of correlated gene-phenotype evolution, Mol. Biol. Evol., 34, 35, 10.1093/molbev/msw238 · DOI · Paper page
- Ruano-Rubio, 2009, Comparison of eukaryotic phylogenetic profiling approaches using species tree aware methods, BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 383, 10.1186/1471-2105-10-383 · DOI
- Innan, 2010, The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models, Nat. Rev. Genet., 11, 97, 10.1038/nrg2689 · DOI
- Hurst, 2004, The evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic gene order, Nat. Rev. Genet., 5, 299, 10.1038/nrg1319 · DOI
- Snitkin, 2006, Comparative assessment of performance and genome dependence among phylogenetic profiling methods, BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 420, 10.1186/1471-2105-7-420 · DOI
- Krause, 2018, Functional and evolutionary characterization of a secondary metabolite gene cluster in budding yeasts, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 115, 11030, 10.1073/pnas.1806268115 · DOI
- Ramazzina, 2006, Completing the uric acid degradation pathway through phylogenetic comparison of whole genomes, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2, 144, 10.1038/nchembio768 · DOI
- Rogozin, 2007, Dollo parsimony and the reconstruction of genome evolution, 190
- Csurös, 2010, Count: Evolutionary analysis of phylogenetic profiles with parsimony and likelihood, Bioinformatics, 26, 1910, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq315 · DOI
- Szllosi, 2015, The inference of gene trees with species trees, Syst. Biol., 64, e42, 10.1093/sysbio/syu048 · DOI
- Altenhoff, 2019, Inferring orthology and paralogy, Methods Mol Biol., 855, 259, 10.1007/978-1-61779-582-4_9 · DOI
- Noutahi, 2016, Efficient gene tree correction guided by genome evolution, PLoS One, 11, e0159559, 10.1371/journal.pone.0159559 · DOI
- Jiang, 2018, Two genetic changes in cis-regulatory elements caused evolution of petal spot position in Clarkia, Nat. Plants., 4, 14, 10.1038/s41477-017-0085-6 · DOI
- Revell, 2014, Ancestral character estimation under the threshold model from quantitative genetics, Evolution (N. Y.), 68, 743
- Cornwell, 2017, Phylogenetic comparative methods, Curr. Biol., 27, R333, 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.049 · DOI
- Joy, 2016, Ancestral Reconstruction, PLoS Comput. Biol., 12, e1004763, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004763 · DOI
- Dunn, 2013, Phylogenetic analysis of gene expression, Integr. Comp. Biol., 53, 847, 10.1093/icb/ict068 · DOI
- Richter, 2018, Gene family innovation, conservation and loss on the animal stem lineage, Elife, 7, e34226, 10.7554/eLife.34226 · DOI
- DePamphilis, 2013, The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants, Science, 342, 1241089, 10.1126/science.1241089 · DOI
- Inoue, 2019, ORTHOSCOPE: an automatic web tool for phylogenetically inferring bilaterian orthogroups with user-selected taxa, Mol. Biol. Evol., 36, 621, 10.1093/molbev/msy226 · DOI
- Emms, 2015, OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy, Genome Biol., 16, 157, 10.1186/s13059-015-0721-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Krizsán, 2019, Transcriptomic atlas of mushroom development reveals conserved genes behind complex multicellularity in fungi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 116, 7409, 10.1073/pnas.1817822116 · DOI
- Sebé-Pedrós, 2017, The origin of Metazoa: a unicellular perspective, Nat. Rev. Genet., 18, 498, 10.1038/nrg.2017.21 · DOI · Paper page
- Wapinski, 2007, Automatic genome-wide reconstruction of phylogenetic gene trees, Bioinformatics, 23, i549, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm193 · DOI
- Nagy, 2016, Comparative genomics of early-diverging mushroom-forming fungi provides insights into the origins of lignocellulose decay capabilities, Mol. Biol. Evol., 33, 959, 10.1093/molbev/msv337 · DOI
- Albalat, 2016, Evolution by gene loss, Nat. Rev. Genet., 17, 379, 10.1038/nrg.2016.39 · DOI · Paper page
- Hiller, 2012, A ‘forward genomics’ approach links genotype to phenotype using independent phenotypic losses among related species, Cell Rep., 2, 817, 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.032 · DOI · Paper page
- Partha, 2019, Robust method for detecting convergent shifts in evolutionary rates, Mol. Biol. Evol., 36, 1817, 10.1093/molbev/msz107 · DOI · Paper page
- Hecker, 2019, Convergent gene losses illuminate metabolic and physiological changes in herbivores and carnivores, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 116, 3036, 10.1073/pnas.1818504116 · DOI
- Roscito, 2018, Phenotype loss is associated with widespread divergence of the gene regulatory landscape in evolution, Nat. Commun., 9, 4737, 10.1038/s41467-018-07122-z · DOI
- Langer, 2018, Reforge associates transcription factor binding site divergence in regulatory elements with phenotypic differences between species, Mol. Biol. Evol., 35, 3027
- Prudent, 2016, Controlling for phylogenetic relatedness and evolutionary rates improves the discovery of associations between species’ phenotypic and genomic differences, Mol. Biol. Evol., 33, 2135, 10.1093/molbev/msw098 · DOI · Paper page
- Li, 2014, Expansion of biological pathways based on evolutionary inference, Cell, 158, 213, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.034 · DOI · Paper page
- Gabaldón, 2008, Review large-scale assignment of orthology: back to phylogenetics, Genome, 9, 235
- Gregg, 2017, Gene-tree reconciliation with MUL-trees to resolve polyploidy events, Syst. Biol., 66, 1007, 10.1093/sysbio/syx044 · DOI
- Knapp, 2018, Comparative genomics provides insights into the lifestyle and reveals functional heterogeneity of dark septate endophytic fungi, Sci. Rep., 8, 6321, 10.1038/s41598-018-24686-4 · DOI
- Murat, 2018, Pezizomycetes genomes reveal the molecular basis of ectomycorrhizal truffle lifestyle, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2, 1956, 10.1038/s41559-018-0710-4 · DOI
- Sipos, 2017, Genome expansion and lineage-specific genetic innovations in the forest pathogenic fungi Armillaria, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 1, 1931, 10.1038/s41559-017-0347-8 · DOI
- Kiss, 2019, Comparative genomics reveals the origin of fungal hyphae and multicellularity, Nat. Commun., 10, 4080, 10.1038/s41467-019-12085-w · DOI
- Griesmann, 2018, Phylogenomics reveals multiple losses of nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiosis, Science, 361, eaat1743, 10.1126/science.aat1743 · DOI · Paper page
- Nagy, 2018, Many roads to convergence, Science, 361, 125, 10.1126/science.aau2409 · DOI
- Bollback, 2006, SIMMAP: stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies, BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 88, 10.1186/1471-2105-7-88 · DOI
- Ronquist, 2004, Bayesian inference of character evolution, Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 475, 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.002 · DOI
- Trail, 2017, The ancestral levels of transcription and the evolution of sexual phenotypes in filamentous fungi, PLos Genet., 13, e1006867, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006867 · DOI
- Huelsenbeck, 2003, Stochastic mapping of morphological characters, Syst. Biol., 52, 131, 10.1080/10635150390192780 · DOI
- Mitchell, 2019, Inferring diversification rate variation from phylogenies with fossils, Syst. Biol., 68, 1
- Ricklefs, 2007, Estimating diversification rates from phylogenetic information, Trends Ecol. Evol., 22, 601, 10.1016/j.tree.2007.06.013 · DOI
- Revell, 2018, Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees, Ecol. Evol., 8, 5303, 10.1002/ece3.4030 · DOI
- Stadler, 2016, Estimating shifts in diversification rates based on higher-level phylogenies, Biol. Lett., 12, 20160273, 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0273 · DOI
- Feijão, 2016, Fast ancestral gene order reconstruction of genomes with unequal gene content, BMC Bioinformatics, 17, 187, 10.1186/s12859-016-1261-9 · DOI
- Huang, 2019, Ancestral Genomes: a resource for reconstructed ancestral genes and genomes across the tree of life, Nucleic Acids Res., 47, D271, 10.1093/nar/gky1009 · DOI
- Feng, 2017, Ancestral genome reconstruction on whole genome level, Curr. Genomics, 18, 306, 10.2174/1389202918666170307120943 · DOI
- Tang, 2019, Ancestral Genome Reconstruction, 193, 10.1007/978-3-030-10837-3_9 · DOI
- Nakhleh, 2013, Computational approaches to species phylogeny inference and gene tree reconciliation, Trends Ecol. Evol., 28, 719, 10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.004 · DOI
- Doyon, 2011, Models, algorithms and programs for phylogeny reconciliation, Brief. Bioinform., 12, 392, 10.1093/bib/bbr045 · DOI
- Maddison, 2007, Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction, Syst. Biol., 56, 701, 10.1080/10635150701607033 · DOI
- Felsenstein, 2005, Using the quantitative genetic threshold model for inferences between and within species, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 29, 1427, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1669 · DOI
- Huelsmann, 2019, Genes lost during the transition from land to water in cetaceans highlight genomic changes associated with aquatic adaptations, Sci. Adv., 5, eaaw6671, 10.1126/sciadv.aaw6671 · DOI
- Chikina, 2016, Hundreds of genes experienced convergent shifts in selective pressure in marine mammals, Mol. Biol. Evol., 33, 2182, 10.1093/molbev/msw112 · DOI · Paper page
- Steinegger, 2017, MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets, Nat. Biotechnol., 35, 1026, 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- Emms, 2019, OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics, Genome Biol., 20, 238, 10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y · DOI · Paper page
- Zou, 2019, A primer on deep learning in genomics, Nat. Genet., 51, 12, 10.1038/s41588-018-0295-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Deutekom, 2019, Measuring the impact of gene prediction on gene loss estimates in Eukaryotes by quantifying falsely inferred absences, PLOS Comput. Biol., 15, e1007301, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007301 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Guided Tour of Phylogenetic Comparative Methods for Studying Trait Evolution
Cornwallis, C. K., & Griffin, A. S. (2024) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102221-050754 · Cited by 37
From Trees to Traits: A Review of Advances in PhyloG2P Methods and Future Directions
Macdonald, A. R., James, M. E., Mitchell, J. D., & Holland, B. R. (2025) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaf150 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagy, L. G., Merényi, Z., Hegedüs, B., & Bálint, B.
- Affiliations
- Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Temesvari krt 62. Szeged 6726, Hungary
- ORCID
- Nagy, László G
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-01-16
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2209-2219
- ISSN
- 0305-1048
- 1362-4962
- PMC
- PMC7049691
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 9
- Language
- en
- Funders
- European Research Council (758161)
- Hungarian National Research (Ginop-2.3.2-15-00001)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review