Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel phylogenetic methods are needed for understanding gene function in the era of mega-scale genome sequencing

Nagy, László G, Merényi, Zsolt, Hegedüs, Botond, Bálint, Balázs·2020·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Ongoing large-scale genome sequencing projects are forecasting a data deluge that will almost certainly overwhelm current analytical capabilities of evolutionary genomics. In contrast to population genomics, there are no standardized methods in evolutionary genomics for extracting evolutionary and functional (e.g. gene-trait association) signal from genomic data. Here, we examine how current practices of multi-species comparative genomics perform in this aspect and point out that many genomic datasets are under-utilized due to the lack of powerful methodologies. As a result, many current analyses emphasize gene families for which some functional data is already available, resulting in a growing gap between functionally well-characterized genes/organisms and the universe of unknowns. This leaves unknown genes on the ‘dark side’ of genomes, a problem that will not be mitigated by sequencing more and more genomes, unless we develop tools to infer functional hypotheses for unknown genes in a systematic manner. We provide an inventory of recently developed methods capable of predicting gene-gene and gene-trait associations based on comparative data, then argue that realizing the full potential of whole genome datasets requires the integration of phylogenetic comparative methods into genomics, a rich but underutilized toolbox for looking into the past.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkz1241

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For simple traits with easily quantifiable phenotypes and a simple genetic basis, PhyloG2P studies will have a chance to identify specific genotype-to-phenotype maps.

    “On one end, we can conceptualize “simple” traits with both easily quantifiable phenotypes and a simple genetic basis. Here PhyloG2P studies will have a chance to identify specific genotype to phenotype maps (Lamichhaney et al. 2019; Nagy et al. 2020; Okuyama et al. 2025).”
  • Utilizing replicated evolution provides a key advantage for discovering genotype-to-phenotype relationships even in genomic regions with no prior functional characterization.

    “It has also been noted that utilizing replicated evolution provides a key advantage for discovering genotype to phenotype relationships, even in genomic regions with no prior functional characterization (Nagy et al. 2020).”
  • The evolutionary perspective of PhyloG2P enables genotype to phenotype mapping in situations where typical population genetics approaches would be challenging, if not impossible to implement.

    “This evolutionary perspective enables genotype to phenotype mapping in situations where typical population genetics approaches would be challenging, if not impossible to implement (Nagy et al. 2020; Smith et al. 2020).”
  • As sequenced genomes rapidly increased in availability over the past 20 years, it became clear that there was a need for statistical analysis methods that could be applied genome-wide while maintaining low error rates.

    “However, as sequenced genomes rapidly increased in availability over the past 20 years, it became clear that there was a need for statistical analysis methods that could be applied genome-wide while maintaining low error rates (Nagy et al. 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 111

  1. Sibbald, 2017, More protist genomes needed, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 1, 145, 10.1038/s41559-017-0145 · DOI
  2. Spang, 2018, Asgard archaea are the closest prokaryotic relatives of eukaryotes, PLoS Genet., 14, e1007080, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007080 · DOI
  3. Lax, 2018, Hemimastigophora is a novel supra-kingdom-level lineage of eukaryotes, Nature, 564, 410, 10.1038/s41586-018-0708-8 · DOI
  4. Strassert, 2018, New phylogenomic analysis of the enigmatic phylum Telonemia further resolves the eukaryote tree of life, Mol. Biol. Evol., 36, 757, 10.1093/molbev/msz012 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Strassert, 2018, Single cell genomics of uncultured marine alveolates shows paraphyly of basal dinoflagellates, ISME J., 12, 304, 10.1038/ismej.2017.167 · DOI
  6. Lewin, 2018, Earth BioGenome Project: sequencing life for the future of life, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 115, 4325, 10.1073/pnas.1720115115 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cheng, 2018, 10KP: A phylodiverse genome sequencing plan, Gigascience., 7, 1, 10.1093/gigascience/giy013 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Twyford, 2018, The road to 10,000 plant genomes, Nat. Plants, 4, 312, 10.1038/s41477-018-0165-2 · DOI
  9. Normile, 2017, Plant scientists plan massive effort to sequence 10,000 genomes, Science
  10. Stajich, 2017, Fungal genomes and insights into the evolution of the kingdom, 619, 10.1128/9781555819583.ch29 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Koepfli, 2015, The genome 10K Project: a way forward, Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci., 3, 57, 10.1146/annurev-animal-090414-014900 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Haussler, 2009, Genome 10K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10000 vertebrate species, J. Hered., 100, 659, 10.1093/jhered/esp086 · DOI
  13. Zhang, 2015, Genomics: bird sequencing project takes off, Nature, 522, 34, 10.1038/522034d · DOI
  14. Evans, 2013, The i5K initiative: advancing arthropod genomics for knowledge, human health, agriculture, and the environment, J. Hered., 104, 595, 10.1093/jhered/est050 · DOI
  15. Levine, 2011, i5k: The 5,000 insect genome project, Am. Entomol, 57, 110, 10.1093/ae/57.2.110 · DOI
  16. Robinson, 2011, Creating a buzz about insect genomes, Science, 331, 1386, 10.1126/science.331.6023.1386 · DOI
  17. Nordberg, 2014, The genome portal of the Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute: 2014; updates, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D26, 10.1093/nar/gkt1069 · DOI
  18. Grigoriev, 2014, MycoCosm portal: Gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D699, 10.1093/nar/gkt1183 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Eisen, 1998, Phylogenomics: improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis, Genome Res., 8, 163, 10.1101/gr.8.3.163 · DOI
  20. Dunn, 2016, Comparative genomics and the diversity of life, Zool. Scr., 45, 5, 10.1111/zsc.12211 · DOI
  21. Collins, 1999, Shattuck lecture—medical and societal consequences of the human genome project, N. Engl. J. Med., 341, 28, 10.1056/NEJM199907013410106 · DOI
  22. Liggett, 2001, Pharmacogenetic applications of the human genome project, Nat. Med., 7, 281, 10.1038/85411 · DOI
  23. Gordon, 1989, The Human Genome Project promises insights into aging, Geriatrics, 44, 89
  24. Shendure, 2019, Genomic medicine–progress, pitfalls, and promise, Cell, 177, 45, 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.003 · DOI
  25. Wade, 2010, A Decade Later, Genetic Map Yields Few New Cures
  26. Taylor, 2011, The human genome project, 10 years in: Did they oversell the revolution?, The Globe and Mail
  27. Cook, 2016, The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2016: data growth and integration, Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D20, 10.1093/nar/gkv1352 · DOI
  28. Alföldi, 2013, Comparative genomics as a tool to understand evolution and disease, Genome Res., 23, 1063, 10.1101/gr.157503.113 · DOI
  29. Bolker, 2012, Model organisms: there's more to life than rats and flies, Nature, 491, 31, 10.1038/491031a · DOI
  30. Horan, 2008, Annotating genes of known and unknown function by large-scale coexpression analysis, Plant Physiol., 147, 41, 10.1104/pp.108.117366 · DOI
  31. Heller, 2009, Charting an unknown protein universe, PLoS Biol., 7, e1000206, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000206 · DOI
  32. Jaroszewski, 2009, Exploration of uncharted regions of the protein universe, PLoS Biol., 7, e1000205, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000205 · DOI
  33. Johnson, 2018, Adaptation and conservation insights from the koala genome, Nat. Genet., 50, 1102, 10.1038/s41588-018-0153-5 · DOI
  34. Werck-reichhart, 2000, Protein family review Cytochromes P450: a success story, Genome Biol., 1, 10.1186/gb-2000-1-6-reviews3003 · DOI
  35. Floudas, 2012, The paleozoic origin of enzymatic lignin decomposition reconstructed from 31 fungal genomes, Science, 336, 1715, 10.1126/science.1221748 · DOI
  36. Altenhoff, 2018, The OMA orthology database in 2018: Retrieving evolutionary relationships among all domains of life through richer web and programmatic interfaces, Nucleic Acids Res., 46, D477, 10.1093/nar/gkx1019 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Nagy, 2014, Latent homology and convergent regulatory evolution underlies the repeated emergence of yeasts, Nat. Commun., 5, 4471, 10.1038/ncomms5471 · DOI
  38. Tam, 2019, Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies, Nat. Rev. Genet., 20, 467, 10.1038/s41576-019-0127-1 · DOI
  39. Visscher, 2017, 10 years of GWAS discovery: biology, function, and translation, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 101, 5, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Sella, 2019, Thinking about the evolution of complex traits in the era of genome-wide association studies, Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet., 20, 461, 10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022316 · DOI
  41. Collins, 2018, A phylogenetic method to perform genome-wide association studies in microbes that accounts for population structure and recombination, PLoS Comput. Biol., 14, e1005958, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005958 · DOI
  42. Pagel, 1999, Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution, Nature, 401, 877, 10.1038/44766 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Barker, 2005, Predicting functional gene links from phylogenetic-statistical analyses of whole genomes, PLoS Comput. Biol., 1, e3, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010003 · DOI
  44. Barker, 2007, Constrained models of evolution lead to improved prediction of functional linkage from correlated gain and loss of genes, Bioinformatics, 23, 14, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl558 · DOI
  45. Pellegrini, 1999, Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96, 4285, 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4285 · DOI
  46. Pellegrini, 2012, Using phylogenetic profiles to predict functional relationships, Methods Mol. Biol., 804, 167, 10.1007/978-1-61779-361-5_9 · DOI
  47. Dey, 2015, Phylogenetic profiling for probing the modular architecture of the human genome, Cell Syst., 1, P105
  48. Dey, 2015, Systematic discovery of human gene function and principles of modular organization through phylogenetic profiling, Cell Rep., 10, 993, 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.025 · DOI
  49. Nagy, 2017, Genetic bases of fungal white rot wood decay predicted by phylogenomic analysis of correlated gene-phenotype evolution, Mol. Biol. Evol., 34, 35, 10.1093/molbev/msw238 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Ruano-Rubio, 2009, Comparison of eukaryotic phylogenetic profiling approaches using species tree aware methods, BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 383, 10.1186/1471-2105-10-383 · DOI
  51. Innan, 2010, The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models, Nat. Rev. Genet., 11, 97, 10.1038/nrg2689 · DOI
  52. Hurst, 2004, The evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic gene order, Nat. Rev. Genet., 5, 299, 10.1038/nrg1319 · DOI
  53. Snitkin, 2006, Comparative assessment of performance and genome dependence among phylogenetic profiling methods, BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 420, 10.1186/1471-2105-7-420 · DOI
  54. Krause, 2018, Functional and evolutionary characterization of a secondary metabolite gene cluster in budding yeasts, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 115, 11030, 10.1073/pnas.1806268115 · DOI
  55. Ramazzina, 2006, Completing the uric acid degradation pathway through phylogenetic comparison of whole genomes, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2, 144, 10.1038/nchembio768 · DOI
  56. Rogozin, 2007, Dollo parsimony and the reconstruction of genome evolution, 190
  57. Csurös, 2010, Count: Evolutionary analysis of phylogenetic profiles with parsimony and likelihood, Bioinformatics, 26, 1910, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq315 · DOI
  58. Szllosi, 2015, The inference of gene trees with species trees, Syst. Biol., 64, e42, 10.1093/sysbio/syu048 · DOI
  59. Altenhoff, 2019, Inferring orthology and paralogy, Methods Mol Biol., 855, 259, 10.1007/978-1-61779-582-4_9 · DOI
  60. Noutahi, 2016, Efficient gene tree correction guided by genome evolution, PLoS One, 11, e0159559, 10.1371/journal.pone.0159559 · DOI
  61. Jiang, 2018, Two genetic changes in cis-regulatory elements caused evolution of petal spot position in Clarkia, Nat. Plants., 4, 14, 10.1038/s41477-017-0085-6 · DOI
  62. Revell, 2014, Ancestral character estimation under the threshold model from quantitative genetics, Evolution (N. Y.), 68, 743
  63. Cornwell, 2017, Phylogenetic comparative methods, Curr. Biol., 27, R333, 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.049 · DOI
  64. Joy, 2016, Ancestral Reconstruction, PLoS Comput. Biol., 12, e1004763, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004763 · DOI
  65. Dunn, 2013, Phylogenetic analysis of gene expression, Integr. Comp. Biol., 53, 847, 10.1093/icb/ict068 · DOI
  66. Richter, 2018, Gene family innovation, conservation and loss on the animal stem lineage, Elife, 7, e34226, 10.7554/eLife.34226 · DOI
  67. DePamphilis, 2013, The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants, Science, 342, 1241089, 10.1126/science.1241089 · DOI
  68. Inoue, 2019, ORTHOSCOPE: an automatic web tool for phylogenetically inferring bilaterian orthogroups with user-selected taxa, Mol. Biol. Evol., 36, 621, 10.1093/molbev/msy226 · DOI
  69. Emms, 2015, OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy, Genome Biol., 16, 157, 10.1186/s13059-015-0721-2 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Krizsán, 2019, Transcriptomic atlas of mushroom development reveals conserved genes behind complex multicellularity in fungi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 116, 7409, 10.1073/pnas.1817822116 · DOI
  71. Sebé-Pedrós, 2017, The origin of Metazoa: a unicellular perspective, Nat. Rev. Genet., 18, 498, 10.1038/nrg.2017.21 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Wapinski, 2007, Automatic genome-wide reconstruction of phylogenetic gene trees, Bioinformatics, 23, i549, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm193 · DOI
  73. Nagy, 2016, Comparative genomics of early-diverging mushroom-forming fungi provides insights into the origins of lignocellulose decay capabilities, Mol. Biol. Evol., 33, 959, 10.1093/molbev/msv337 · DOI
  74. Albalat, 2016, Evolution by gene loss, Nat. Rev. Genet., 17, 379, 10.1038/nrg.2016.39 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Hiller, 2012, A ‘forward genomics’ approach links genotype to phenotype using independent phenotypic losses among related species, Cell Rep., 2, 817, 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.032 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Partha, 2019, Robust method for detecting convergent shifts in evolutionary rates, Mol. Biol. Evol., 36, 1817, 10.1093/molbev/msz107 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Hecker, 2019, Convergent gene losses illuminate metabolic and physiological changes in herbivores and carnivores, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 116, 3036, 10.1073/pnas.1818504116 · DOI
  78. Roscito, 2018, Phenotype loss is associated with widespread divergence of the gene regulatory landscape in evolution, Nat. Commun., 9, 4737, 10.1038/s41467-018-07122-z · DOI
  79. Langer, 2018, Reforge associates transcription factor binding site divergence in regulatory elements with phenotypic differences between species, Mol. Biol. Evol., 35, 3027
  80. Prudent, 2016, Controlling for phylogenetic relatedness and evolutionary rates improves the discovery of associations between species’ phenotypic and genomic differences, Mol. Biol. Evol., 33, 2135, 10.1093/molbev/msw098 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Li, 2014, Expansion of biological pathways based on evolutionary inference, Cell, 158, 213, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.034 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Gabaldón, 2008, Review large-scale assignment of orthology: back to phylogenetics, Genome, 9, 235
  83. Gregg, 2017, Gene-tree reconciliation with MUL-trees to resolve polyploidy events, Syst. Biol., 66, 1007, 10.1093/sysbio/syx044 · DOI
  84. Knapp, 2018, Comparative genomics provides insights into the lifestyle and reveals functional heterogeneity of dark septate endophytic fungi, Sci. Rep., 8, 6321, 10.1038/s41598-018-24686-4 · DOI
  85. Murat, 2018, Pezizomycetes genomes reveal the molecular basis of ectomycorrhizal truffle lifestyle, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2, 1956, 10.1038/s41559-018-0710-4 · DOI
  86. Sipos, 2017, Genome expansion and lineage-specific genetic innovations in the forest pathogenic fungi Armillaria, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 1, 1931, 10.1038/s41559-017-0347-8 · DOI
  87. Kiss, 2019, Comparative genomics reveals the origin of fungal hyphae and multicellularity, Nat. Commun., 10, 4080, 10.1038/s41467-019-12085-w · DOI
  88. Griesmann, 2018, Phylogenomics reveals multiple losses of nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiosis, Science, 361, eaat1743, 10.1126/science.aat1743 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Nagy, 2018, Many roads to convergence, Science, 361, 125, 10.1126/science.aau2409 · DOI
  90. Bollback, 2006, SIMMAP: stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies, BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 88, 10.1186/1471-2105-7-88 · DOI
  91. Ronquist, 2004, Bayesian inference of character evolution, Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 475, 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.002 · DOI
  92. Trail, 2017, The ancestral levels of transcription and the evolution of sexual phenotypes in filamentous fungi, PLos Genet., 13, e1006867, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006867 · DOI
  93. Huelsenbeck, 2003, Stochastic mapping of morphological characters, Syst. Biol., 52, 131, 10.1080/10635150390192780 · DOI
  94. Mitchell, 2019, Inferring diversification rate variation from phylogenies with fossils, Syst. Biol., 68, 1
  95. Ricklefs, 2007, Estimating diversification rates from phylogenetic information, Trends Ecol. Evol., 22, 601, 10.1016/j.tree.2007.06.013 · DOI
  96. Revell, 2018, Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees, Ecol. Evol., 8, 5303, 10.1002/ece3.4030 · DOI
  97. Stadler, 2016, Estimating shifts in diversification rates based on higher-level phylogenies, Biol. Lett., 12, 20160273, 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0273 · DOI
  98. Feijão, 2016, Fast ancestral gene order reconstruction of genomes with unequal gene content, BMC Bioinformatics, 17, 187, 10.1186/s12859-016-1261-9 · DOI
  99. Huang, 2019, Ancestral Genomes: a resource for reconstructed ancestral genes and genomes across the tree of life, Nucleic Acids Res., 47, D271, 10.1093/nar/gky1009 · DOI
  100. Feng, 2017, Ancestral genome reconstruction on whole genome level, Curr. Genomics, 18, 306, 10.2174/1389202918666170307120943 · DOI
  101. Tang, 2019, Ancestral Genome Reconstruction, 193, 10.1007/978-3-030-10837-3_9 · DOI
  102. Nakhleh, 2013, Computational approaches to species phylogeny inference and gene tree reconciliation, Trends Ecol. Evol., 28, 719, 10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.004 · DOI
  103. Doyon, 2011, Models, algorithms and programs for phylogeny reconciliation, Brief. Bioinform., 12, 392, 10.1093/bib/bbr045 · DOI
  104. Maddison, 2007, Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction, Syst. Biol., 56, 701, 10.1080/10635150701607033 · DOI
  105. Felsenstein, 2005, Using the quantitative genetic threshold model for inferences between and within species, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 29, 1427, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1669 · DOI
  106. Huelsmann, 2019, Genes lost during the transition from land to water in cetaceans highlight genomic changes associated with aquatic adaptations, Sci. Adv., 5, eaaw6671, 10.1126/sciadv.aaw6671 · DOI
  107. Chikina, 2016, Hundreds of genes experienced convergent shifts in selective pressure in marine mammals, Mol. Biol. Evol., 33, 2182, 10.1093/molbev/msw112 · DOI · Paper page
  108. Steinegger, 2017, MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets, Nat. Biotechnol., 35, 1026, 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  109. Emms, 2019, OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics, Genome Biol., 20, 238, 10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y · DOI · Paper page
  110. Zou, 2019, A primer on deep learning in genomics, Nat. Genet., 51, 12, 10.1038/s41588-018-0295-5 · DOI · Paper page
  111. Deutekom, 2019, Measuring the impact of gene prediction on gene loss estimates in Eukaryotes by quantifying falsely inferred absences, PLOS Comput. Biol., 15, e1007301, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007301 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nagy, L. G., Merényi, Z., Hegedüs, B., & Bálint, B.
Affiliations
Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Temesvari krt 62. Szeged 6726, Hungary
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2020-01-16
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
2209-2219
ISSN
  • 0305-1048
  • 1362-4962
Cited by
43
References
9
Language
en
Funders
  • European Research Council (758161)
  • Hungarian National Research (Ginop-2.3.2-15-00001)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review