CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 225Academic integrity and plagiarismResearch, Science, and AcademiaAcademic Publishing and Open Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 475 of the 475 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Responsible Conduct of Research

Shamoo, Adil E., Resnik, David B.·2022
DOI 10.1093/oso/9780197547090.001.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Responsible Conduct of Research provides an overview of ethical, legal, and social issues in scientific research for science students, trainees, and professional scientists. Written by two leading scholars in the field of research ethics, one with a background in natural science and the other with a background in philosophy and law, the book incorporates insights from these diverse disciplines throughout the text. The book provides in-depth analyses of a wide array of topics, including ethical theory and decision-making, misconduct, questionable research practices, research record-keeping, data sharing, data auditing, reproducibility, authorship, publication, peer review, intellectual property, conflict of interest, mentoring, safe research environment, animal experimentation, research with human subjects, and social responsibility. The book also includes interesting case studies and provocative questions at the end of each chapter that can serve as a basis for further analysis and discussion. The concluding chapter of the book describes some steps that researchers, institutional officials, government agencies, and scientific organizations can take to promote ethical conduct in scientific research. The 4th edition of Responsible Conduct of Research includes updated references and discussions of new and evolving topics, such as digital image manipulation, text recycling (sometimes called self-plagiarism), retractions, publication on pre-print servers, sexual and other forms of harassment, research with human biological samples, revisions to the Common Rule for research with human subjects, dual use research, the COVID-19 pandemic, providing science advice, and interactions with the media.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780197547090.001.0001

Cites

475 of 475 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

3 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 249

  1. 1995, Final Report. Stock No. 061-000-00-848-9,
  2. 2012, The House of Wisdom_ How Arab Science Saved Ancient Knowledge and Gave us the Renaissance
  3. 1995, Promises of Miracles: News Releases Go Where Journals Fear to Tread., New York Times
  4. 1997, Experts See Bias in Drug Data., New York Times
  5. 1988, Project on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct
  6. 2013, R #amp; D Budget and Policy Program
  7. 1997, Science on Trial
  8. 1996., Title 7 U.S. Code,
  9. 1984, Nichomachean Ethics
  10. Cleveland Clinic to Tighten Its Disclosure Policies., Wall Street Journal
  11. 1997, Test of AIDS Vaccine Sought., Denver Post
  12. 2013, Substantial Agreement of Referee Recommendations at a General Medical Journal—A Peer Review Evaluation at Deutsches Ärzteblatt.”, International. PLoS ONE
  13. 1996, Piltdown Meltdown: A Hoaxer Revealed., Washington Post
  14. 1988, Professional Ethics
  15. 2020, Beall’s List of Predatory Journals and Publishers
  16. 1977, Walter Reed and the Ordeal of Human Experiments., Bulletin of the History of Medicine
  17. 1994, Big-Time Biology., Scientific American
  18. 2000, Excess Heat—Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed
  19. 2014, Medical Research Misconduct Needs Regulatory Reforms., Indian Journal of Community Medicine
  20. 2003, Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research.”, Journal of the Americal Medical Assocation
  21. 1994, Regulations and Essential Requirements for Animals in Research
  22. 1994, Publication Bias and Public Health on Environmental Tobacco Smoke., Journal of the American Medical Association
  23. Bingham, C. 2000. “Peer Review and the Ethics of Internet Publishing.” In Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication, edited by A. Jones and F. McLellan, 85–112. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  24. 1986, The Piltdown Inquest
  25. 1995, Academic–Industry Relationships in the 1990s: Continuity and Change., Paper presented at the symposium Ethical Issues in Research Relationships between Universities and Industry,
  26. 1996, Participation of Life-Science Faculty in Relationships with Industry., New England Journal of Medicine
  27. 1996, Relationship between Academic Institutions and Industry in the Life Sciences—An Industry Survey., New England Journal of Medicine
  28. 1997, Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science: Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty., Journal of the American Medical Association
  29. 2006, Bioethics.
  30. 1991, Peer Review Under Fire., Science News
  31. Bradley, G. 2000. “Managing Conflicting Interests.” In Scientific Integrity, edited by Francis Macrina, 131–156. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press.
  32. 1998, A Theory of the Good and the Right
  33. 1995, The Day the Universe Changed
  34. 2007, Copycat Trap., Nature
  35. 2002, Data Withholding in Academic Genetics: Evidence from a National Survey.”, Journal of the American Medical Association
  36. 1992, The Animals Issue
  37. 1991, The Nature of Suffering
  38. 1999, Perspectives on Genetic Patenting
  39. 1980, How to Register a Copyright and Protect Your Creative Work
  40. 1997, Letters to the Editor, Disclosing Conflicts of Interest., Lancet
  41. 2000, Accountability in Research
  42. 1990, Peerless Science
  43. 1991, What Next in the Gallo Case?”, Science
  44. 1981, Peer Review in the NSF: Phase Two
  45. Committee on Publication Ethics. 2020. “Peer Review Processes.” https://publicationethics.org/peerreview.
  46. 2009, On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research
  47. 2020, U.S. Research and Development Funding and Performance: Fact Sheet
  48. 1994, Tainted Truth
  49. 1986, A Randomised Controlled Trial of Prophylactic Neuroleptic Treatment., British Journal of Psychiatry
  50. 1990, Gallo Inquiry Takes Puzzling Turn., Science
  51. 2015, Collateral Damage: How a Case of Misconduct Brought a Leading Japanese Biology Institute to its Knees., Nature
  52. CRISPR-baby Scientist Fails to Satisfy Critics. He Jiankui Gives Talk about Controversial Claim of Genome Editing Babies, but Ethical Questions Remain., Nature
  53. 2001, Peers under Pressure., Nature
  54. 1993, S CT 2768
  55. 2003, Self-Experimentation.”, Accountability in Research
  56. 1982, Conflict of Interest., Business and Professional Ethics Journal
  57. 2000, Prevention of Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission in Resource-poor Countries: Translating Research into Policy and Practice.”, Journal of the American Medical Association
  58. 1995, Business Ethics
  59. 1997, The Messenger Under Attack—Intimidation of Research by Special-Interest Groups., New England Journal of Medicine
  60. 1980, 447 US:
  61. 1988, The New Politics of Science
  62. 1995, Between Politics and Science
  63. Dustira, A. K. 1992. “The Funding of Basic and Clinical Biomedical Research.” In Biomedical Research: Collaboration and Conflict of Interest, edited by R. J. Porter and T. E. Malone, 33–56. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  64. 1998, Ethical Aerobics: ACHREs Flight from Responsibility., Accountability in Research
  65. 1991, Origins of MIT Inquiry., Nature
  66. If the Lab-Leak Theory Is Right, What’s Next?”, The Atlantic
  67. 1994, Science.
  68. 2017, European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.
  69. 2019, Clinical Trials
  70. 1998, Prevalence of Articles with Honorary and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals., Journal of the American Medical Association
  71. 2013, Policies and Procedures for Handling Conflicts of Interest with FDA Advisory Committee Members, Consultants, and Experts.
  72. 2003, Enron—The Rise and Fall
  73. 1990, Moral Reasoning
  74. 1973, Ethics
  75. Frey, R. 1994. “The Ethics of the Search for Benefits: Experimentation in Medicine.” In Principles of Health Care Ethics, edited by R. Gillon, 1067–1075. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
  76. 1999, Evaluation of Conflict of Interest in New Drugs Used in Oncology., Journal of the American Medical Association
  77. 1990, The Impact of Fraudulent Research on the Scientific Literature—The Stephen Breuning Case., Journal of the American Medical Association
  78. 1999, Black’s Law Dictionary
  79. 1996, The Price of Silence: Does Profit-Minded Secrecy Retard Scientific Progress?”, Scientific American
  80. 311Godlee, F. 2000. “The Ethics of Peer Review.” In Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication, edited by A. Jones and F. McLellan, 59–84. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  81. 2002, Making Reviewers Visible—Openness, Accountability, and Credit., Journal of the American Medical Association
  82. 1993, Trying to Declaw the Campus Copycats., Insight Magazine
  83. 2019, Cold Fusion Remains Elusive—But These Scientists May Revive the Quest.”, National Geographic
  84. 1992, The Scientific Attitude
  85. 2003, Defending Science within Reason
  86. 1991, NIH Finds Fraud in Cell Paper., Science
  87. 1977, The Nature of Morality
  88. Research: Gender Bias in Peer Review.”, eLife
  89. 1994, Philip Morris Blocked ’83 Paper Showing Tobacco is Addictive, Panel Finds., New York Times
  90. 1976, The Patchwork Mouse
  91. 1998, Acres of Skin
  92. Hoy, Q. A. 2018. “Press Release, September 15, 2018: AAAS Approves Policy to Revoke Elected Fellows for Misconduct or Ethics Breach.” https://www.aaas.org/news/aaas-approves-policy-revoke-elected-fellows-misconduct-or-ethics-breach.
  93. 1988, Science as a Process
  94. Huth, E. 2000. “Repetitive and Divided Publication.” In Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication, edited by A. Jones and F. McLellan, 112–136. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  95. 1991, Biomedical Politics
  96. 2004, Intentional Human Dosing Studies for EPA Regulatory Purposes: Scientific and Ethical Issues
  97. 2014, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change
  98. 2020, Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors
  99. 1993, Which Ethics for Science and Public Policy.”, Accountability in Research
  100. Jones, A. 2000. “Changing Traditions of Authorship.” In Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication, edited by A. Jones and F. McLellan, 3–29. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  101. 1981, Bad Blood
  102. Journal of Cell Biology. 2007. “Image Manipulation.” http://www.jcb.org/misc/ifora.shtml#image_AUuisition.
  103. 1998, Does Masking the Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?”, Journal of the American Medical Association
  104. 2013, Thinking: Fast and Slow
  105. 2013, The Research–Treatment Distinction: A Problematic Approach for Determining which Activities Should Have Ethical Oversight., Ethical Oversight of Learning Health Care Systems, Hastings Center Report Special Report
  106. 1995, Patent Practice, vol. 1
  107. 2006, Responding to Fraud.”, Science
  108. 1995, Experimental Design
  109. 1993, The Advancement of Science
  110. 2001, Scientific Misconduct: Wellcome Rules Widen the Net., Science
  111. 1998, Doing Harm_ Research on the Mentally Ill.”, The Boston Globe
  112. 2018, Lawrence Krauss and the Legacy of Harassment in Science.”, The Atlantic
  113. 1996, The Sources of Normativity
  114. 1996, Financial Interests of Authors in Scientific Publications., Science and Engineering Ethics
  115. 2007, Defining Scientific Misconduct: When Conflict-of-Interest is a Factor in Scientific Misconduct.”, Medicine and Law
  116. 2007, Testing Pesticides in Humans—Of Mice and Men Divided by Ten.”, Journal of the American Medical Association
  117. Kuflik, A. 1989. “Moral Foundations of Intellectual Property Rights.” In Owning Scientific and Technical Information, edited by V. Weil and J. Snapper, 29–39. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  118. 1991, Fraud Buster., Washington Post Magazine
  119. 1996, Brute Science
  120. 2000, The Evaluation of the ‘Scientific Misconduct’ Issues: An Historical Overview.”, Proceedings for the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine
  121. 2019, NIH Annual Snapshot—FY 2018 By the Numbers.”, Open Mike, National Institutes of Health
  122. 2003, The Politics of Publication., Nature
  123. 2012, Bias in Peer Review., Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  124. 2009, Criminal Law
  125. 2001, Equipoise and International Human-subjects Research., Bioethics
  126. 1990, Science as Social Knowledge
  127. 2000, Science
  128. 1984, After Virtue
  129. 2003, Bioethics,
  130. 2013, Scientific Integrity
  131. 1998, Science
  132. 1998, Embargoes: Good, Bad, or ‘Necessary Evil’?”, Science
  133. 1999, Duke Told to Stop Clinical Trials., Science News
  134. 2000, The Rise of the Mouse, Biomedicine’s Model Animal., Science
  135. 2019, Internet Deception is Here to Stay—So What Do We Do Now?”, Wired
  136. 2010, Octopus: The Ocean’s Intelligence Invertebrate
  137. 1947, Modern Library. Introduction to Aristotle
  138. 1995, Authorship in Biomedical Publications: How Many People Can Wield One Pen?”, American Medical Writers Association
  139. 1992, The Great Scientists
  140. 2020, COVID-19 Ethics and Research.”, Mayo Clinic Proceedings
  141. 1973, The Sociology of Science
  142. 2002, Science
  143. 2017, Justice. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  144. 2008, Neurobiology: The Roots of Morality., Science
  145. 2013, Robert Oppenheimer: His Life and Mind
  146. 1990, 51 Cal 3d 120
  147. 2000, Undue Risk—Secrete State Experiments on Humans
  148. 2001, Academic Relationships with Industry: A New Model for Biomedical Research., Journal of the American Medical Association
  149. 2005, Is Peer Review in Crisis?”, Oral Oncology
  150. 1992, Intervention and Reflection
  151. 1998, 80 Exemplary Ethics Statements
  152. 1992, Responsible Science—Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process
  153. 1997, Advisor, Teacher, Role Model, Friend: On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering
  154. 2002, Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct
  155. 2011, Examining Core Elements of International Research Collaboration
  156. 2017, Fostering Integrity in Research
  157. 2018, Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
  158. 2019, Reproducibility and Reliability in Science
  159. 1998, Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders That May Affect Decision making Capacity, Vol. 1, Report and Recommendations
  160. 1979, The Belmont Report
  161. 2003, NIH Data Sharing and Policy Implementation Guidance
  162. 2009, Update on the Requirement for Instruction in Responsible Conduct of Research
  163. 2020, Press Release, April 17, 2020: NIH to Launch Public–Private Partnership to Speed COVID-19 Vaccine and Treatment Options
  164. 2021, Guidelines for the Conduct of Research in the Intramural Program at NIH
  165. 1988, Use of Laboratory Animals in Biomedical and Behavioral Research
  166. 1996, Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
  167. 2004, Biotechnology in the Age of Terrorism
  168. 2009, Responsible Conduct of Research.”, Federal Register
  169. 1999, Policy on Papers’ Contributors., Nature
  170. 2002, The Ethics of Patenting DNA
  171. 2012, Case Summary: Marc Hauser
  172. 2000, Federal Research Misconduct Policy.”, Federal Register
  173. 1986, Alternatives to Animal Use in Research, Testing, and Education
  174. 2012, Prevalence of Scientific Misconduct among a Group of Researchers in Nigeria., Developing World Bioethics
  175. 1999, Animal Rights—The Inhumane Crusade
  176. 2015, Psychology. Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.”, Science
  177. 1998, The Human Use of Animals
  178. 2019, How to Mentor Ethically., Monitor on Psychology
  179. Pence, G. 1995. “Animal Subjects.” In Classic Cases in Medical Ethics, by edited by G. Pence, 203–224. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  180. 2006, Professional Skills: The Merits of Training Mentors., Science
  181. 2020, Open Peer Review
  182. 2000, Poll Shows Researchers Favor Animal Lab Protection., Science
  183. 1995, Ethics
  184. Porter, D. 1993. “Science, Scientific Motivation, and Conflict of Interest in Research.” In Ethical Issues in Research, edited by D. Cheny, 114–125. Frederick, MD: University Press.
  185. 2000, The Kept University., The Atlantic Monthly
  186. 1988, Radical Hygiene—Medicine under the Nazis
  187. 1999, The Nazi War on Cancer
  188. 2006, Disclosing Individual Results to Research Participants., American Journal of Bioethics
  189. 1971, A Theory of Justice
  190. 1999, Science for Sale., Boston Phoenix
  191. 2006, Research Misconduct Policies of Highest Impact Biomedical Journals.”, Accountability in Research
  192. 1983, The Case for Animal Rights
  193. 2009, Plastic Fantastic: How the Biggest Fraud in Physics Shook the World
  194. 1989, How Much Fraud? Let’s Do an Experimental Audit., AAAS Observer
  195. 1989, Editors and Auditors [see comments]., Journal of the American Medical Association
  196. 1998, The Ethics of Science
  197. 2006, A Survey of Research Practices at the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences. Proceedings from 2006 ORI Conference on Research on Research Integrity
  198. 2007, Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Research Involving Litigation or Regulation., The Journal of Philosophy, Science #amp; Law
  199. 2009, The Investigator–Subject Relationship: A Contextual Approach., ournal of Philosophy, Ethics, Humanities in Medicine
  200. 2011, A Troubled Tradition.”, American Scientist

200 of 249 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 225

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B.
Affiliations
  • Professor, University of Maryland School of Medicine
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
ORCID
Resnik, David B.
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York
Published
2022-05-19
DOI
10.1093/oso/9780197547090.001.0001
OpenAlex
W4280589601
Cited by
224
References
474
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 11
FWCI
37.30
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
responsible conduct of research, research ethics, research misconduct, questionable research practices, data sharing, data auditing, reproducibility, authorship, peer review, intellectual property, conflicts of interest, mentoring, animal experimentation, human subjects research, Common Rule, dual-use research, COVID-19 pandemic, scientific advice, science and media, image editing, self-plagiarism, retraction, harassment, human samples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review