Cited by 408Behavioral Health and InterventionsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Multiple health behaviours: overview and implications

Open access
Spring, B., Moller, A. C., Coons, M. J.·2012·Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More remains unknown than known about how to optimize multiple health behaviour change. METHODS: After reviewing the prevalence and comorbidities among major chronic disease risk behaviours for adults and youth, we consider the origins and applicability of high-risk and population strategies to foster multiple health behaviour change. RESULTS: Findings indicate that health risk behaviours are prevalent, increase with age and co-occur as risk behaviour clusters or bundles. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that both population and high-risk strategies for health behaviour intervention are warranted, potentially synergistic and need intervention design that accounts for substitute and complementary relationships among bundled health behaviours. To maximize positive public health impact, a pressing need exists for bodies of basic and translational science that explain health behaviour bundling. Also needed is applied science that elucidates the following: (1) the optimal number of behaviours to intervene upon; (2) how target behaviours are best selected (e.g. greatest health impact; patient preference or positive effect on bundled behaviours); (3) whether to increase healthy or decrease unhealthy behaviours; (4) whether to intervene on health behaviours simultaneously or sequentially and (5) how to achieve positive synergies across individual-, group- and population-level intervention approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pubmed/fdr111

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conjoint use of high-risk and population strategies is essential to optimize cardiovascular outcomes and healthcare costs.

    “Conjoint use of high-risk and population strategies is essential to optimize cardiovascular outcomes and healthcare costs.5,32–34”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spring, B., Moller, A. C., & Coons, M. J.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Spring, B.
Venue
Journal of Public Health
Published
2012-02-23
Volume
34
Issue
suppl 1
Pages
i3-i10
ISSN
  • 0943-1853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3842
  • 1741-3850
OpenAlex
W2126048069
Cited by
408
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
FWCI
21.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL075451)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA060553)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (RC1DK087126)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
health risk behaviors, high-risk strategy, population strategy, health behavior interventions, intervention design, comorbidities, adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Chronic Disease, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Primary Prevention, Risk-Taking, Global Health, Health Behavior, Substance-Related Disorders, Unsafe Sex, Young Adult, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review