Cited by 517Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Physical activity, fitness and fatness: relations to mortality, morbidity and disease risk factors. A systematic review

Fogelholm, M.·2010·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Summary: The purpose of this systematic review was to study the relative health risks of poor cardio‐respiratory fitness (or physical inactivity) in normal‐weight people vs. obesity in individuals with good cardio‐respiratory fitness (or high physical activity). The core inclusion criteria were: publication year 1990 or later; adult participants; design prospective follow‐up, case–control or cross‐sectional; data on cardio‐respiratory fitness and/or physical activity; data on BMI (body mass index), waist circumference or body composition; outcome data on all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular disease mortality, cardiovascular disease incidence, type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular and type 2 diabetes risk factors. Thirty‐six publications filled the criteria for inclusion. The data indicate that the risk for all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality was lower in individuals with high BMI and good aerobic fitness, compared with individuals with normal BMI and poor fitness. In contrast, having high BMI even with high physical activity was a greater risk for the incidence of type 2 diabetes and the prevalence of cardiovascular and diabetes risk factors, compared with normal BMI with low physical activity. The conclusions of the present review may not be applicable to individuals with BMI > 35.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2009.00653.x

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Poor fitness or low physical activity in physically unfit individuals is a greater all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk than obesity in physically fit individuals.

    “Poor fitness or low PA in physically unfit individuals is a greater all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk than obesity in physically fit individual (185).”

    From Lack of Exercise Is a Major Cause of Chronic Diseases (2012) · cites this paper as [185]

  • For individuals with BMI 25-35, high BMI even with high physical activity is associated with greater risk of incident type 2 diabetes and greater prevalence of cardiovascular and diabetes risk factors than normal BMI with low physical activity.

    “for individuals with BMI of 25–35 having high BMI even with high physical activity were at a greater risk for the incidence of T2D and the prevalence of cardiovascular and diabetes risk factors, compared with normal BMI with low physical activity.”

    From Lack of Exercise Is a Major Cause of Chronic Diseases (2012) · cites this paper as [185]

  • One likely mechanism by which physical fitness and activity reduce health risk associated with high BMI is decreasing the fat-to-lean mass ratio and the visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio.

    “one of the mechanisms by which physical fitness and activity reduce health risk associated with high BMI is by decreasing fat-to-lean mass ratio and also by decreasing visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio.”

    From Lack of Exercise Is a Major Cause of Chronic Diseases (2012) · cites this paper as [185]

  • Decreasing visceral adipose tissue is particularly important for BMIs between 25 and 30.

    “decreasing VAT is particularly important for BMIs between 25 and 30 (185).”

    From Lack of Exercise Is a Major Cause of Chronic Diseases (2012) · cites this paper as [185]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fogelholm, M.
Affiliations
Research Council of Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Fogelholm, M.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-22
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
202-221
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W2041545551
Cited by
517
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 50
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, obesity, body mass index, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular disease incidence, type 2 diabetes, diabetes risk factors, cardiovascular risk factors, physical inactivity, waist circumference, body composition
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Morbidity, Obesity, Physical Fitness, Risk Factors, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review