The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The “Wall Street Walk” and Shareholder Activism: Exit as a Form of Voice
Open accessAbstract
We examine whether a large shareholder can alleviate conflicts of interest between managers and shareholders through the credible threat of exit on the basis of private information. In our model, the threat of exit often reduces agency costs, but additional private information need not enhance the effectiveness of the mechanism. Moreover, the threat of exit can produce quite different effects depending on whether the agency problem involves desirable or undesirable actions from shareholders' perspective. Our results are consistent with empirical findings on the interaction between managers and minority large shareholders and have further empirical implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation
Hartzell, J. C., & Starks, L. T. (2003) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00608.x · Cited by 2,005
Market Liquidity and Performance Monitoring
Holmström, B., & Tirole, J. (1993) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261893 · Cited by 1,719
Large Shareholders, Monitoring, and the Value of the Firm
Burkart, M., Gromb, D., & Panunzi, F. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555325 · Cited by 1,509
Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance
BRAV, A., JIANG, W., PARTNOY, F., & THOMAS, R. (2008) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01373.x · Cited by 1,507
Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is There a Trade‐Off between Liquidity and Control?
Maug, E. (1998) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.35053 · Cited by 1,452
Blockholder Trading, Market Efficiency, and Managerial Myopia
EDMANS, A. (2009) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01508.x · Cited by 1,258
Voting with their feet: institutional ownership changes around forced CEO turnover
Parrino, R., Sias, R. W., & Starks, L. T. (2003) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(02)00247-7 · Cited by 1,008
Liquidity versus Control: The Institutional Investor as Corporate Monitor
Coffee, J. C. (1991) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1123064 · Cited by 921
Large Shareholder Activism, Risk Sharing, and Financial Market Equilibrium
Admati, A. R., Pfleiderer, P., & Zechner, J. (1994) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261965 · Cited by 902
Self-citationTirole, J. (2001) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00177 · Cited by 883
Cited by
Behind the Scenes: The Corporate Governance Preferences of Institutional Investors
McCAHERY, J. A., SAUTNER, Z., & STARKS, L. T. (2016) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12393 · Cited by 1,494
Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?
FANG, V. W., TIAN, X., & TICE, S. (2014) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12187 · Cited by 1,339
Blockholder Trading, Market Efficiency, and Managerial Myopia
EDMANS, A. (2009) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01508.x · Cited by 1,258
Corporate governance and blockchains
Yermack, D. (2017) · Review of Finance · doi:10.1093/rof/rfw074 · Cited by 1,082
Passive investors, not passive owners
Appel, I. R., Gormley, T. A., & Keim, D. B. (2016) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.03.003 · Cited by 965
Metadata
- Authors
- Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P.
- Venue
- Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-05-18
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2645-2685
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2105094633
- Cited by
- 907
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 135.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The “Wall Street Walk” and Shareholder Activism: Exit as a Form of Voice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/hhp037
- The paper
- Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P. (2009). The “Wall Street Walk” and Shareholder Activism: Exit as a Form of Voice. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.