Cited by 181Social Robot Interaction and HRIAction Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and Perception

Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters' actions

Open access
Chaminade, Thierry, Hodgins, Jessica, Kawato, Mitsuo·2007·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Computer-animated characters are common in popular culture and have begun to be used as experimental tools in social cognitive neurosciences. Here we investigated how appearance of these characters' influences perception of their actions. Subjects were presented with different characters animated either with motion data captured from human actors or by interpolating between poses (keyframes) designed by an animator, and were asked to categorize the motion as biological or artificial. The response bias towards 'biological', derived from the Signal Detection Theory, decreases with characters' anthropomorphism, while sensitivity is only affected by the simplest rendering style, point-light displays. fMRI showed that the response bias correlates positively with activity in the mentalizing network including left temporoparietal junction and anterior cingulate cortex, and negatively with regions sustaining motor resonance. The absence of significant effect of the characters on the brain activity suggests individual differences in the neural responses to unfamiliar artificial agents. While computer-animated characters are invaluable tools to investigate the neural bases of social cognition, further research is required to better understand how factors such as anthropomorphism affect their perception, in order to optimize their appearance for entertainment, research or therapeutic purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsm017

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mori, M. (1970). The valley of eeriness (Japanese). Energy, 7(4), 33-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaminade, T., Hodgins, J., & Kawato, M.
Affiliations
Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2007-05-21
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
206-216
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2096183091
Cited by
181
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0326322)
  • Carnegie Mellon University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
anthropomorphism, action perception, point-light displays, mentalizing network, temporoparietal junction, anterior cingulate cortex, motor resonance, social cognition, response bias, individual differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthroposophy, Computer Simulation, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Psychological, Motion Perception, Parietal Lobe, Psychological Theory, Social Perception, Temporal Lobe, Signal Detection, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review