Cited by 23Action Observation and SynchronizationEmpathy and Medical EducationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Empathy for pain motivates actions without altruistic effects: evidence of motor dynamics and brain activity

Open access
Han, Xiaochun, He, Kang, Wu, Bing, Shi, Zhenhao, Liu, Yi, Luo, Siyang, Wei, Kunlin, Wu, Xinhuai +1 more·2017·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Empathy has been supposed to be a proximate mechanism of altruistic behavior. We investigated whether empathy for pain drives actions without altruistic effects and how such actions modulate neural responses to others' pain. In two experiments, we asked healthy adults to press a button for no reason when viewing video clips showing faces with pain expressions receiving needle penetration or faces with neutral expressions receiving a cotton swab touch. Experiment 1 found that participants pressed a button with greater response force when watching painful than non-painful stimuli. Participants who reported greater unpleasant feelings pressed the button harder when viewing painful stimuli. Experiment 2 revealed that passively viewing painful vs non-painful stimuli increased blood-oxygen-level-dependent signals in the middle cingulate cortex, supplementary motor cortex, and bilateral second somatosensory and inferior frontal cortex, which, however, were reduced by the action of button press without altruistic effects. In addition, individuals who reported higher personal distress illustrated greater decrease of the second somatosensory activity induced by button press. Our results indicate that empathy for pain motivates simple actions without altruistic effects that in turn reduce neural responses to others' pain, suggesting a functional role of action execution in self distress relief when viewing others' suffering.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsx016

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect size of brain activities in response to others' suffering was between 0.39 and 0.84.

    “On the basis of the previous fMRI study of empathy for pain (Han et al., 2017), the effect size of brain activities (including aMCC, bilateral AI and bilateral SII) in response to others' suffering was between 0.39 and 0.84 (a middle effect size).”

    From A neurobiological association of revenge propensity during intergroup conflict (2020) · cites this paper as Han et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, X., He, K., Wu, B., Shi, Z., Liu, Y., Luo, S., Wei, K., Wu, X., & Han, S.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • The Military General Hospital of Beijing PLA (CN)
Corresponding author
Han, Shihui
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2017-02-17
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
893-901
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2589932811
Cited by
23
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
empathy for pain, altruism, action motivation, middle cingulate cortex, supplementary motor area, secondary somatosensory cortex, inferior frontal cortex, personal distress, motor dynamics
MeSH terms
Adult, Altruism, Brain, Brain Mapping, Empathy, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Oxygen, Pain, Photic Stimulation, Somatosensory Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review