Cited by 10Mental Health and PsychiatrySchizophrenia research and treatmentEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Schizophrenia, Subjectivity, and Mindreading

Open access
Nour, Matthew M., Barrera, Alvaro·2015·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

A number of recent articles, many appearing in Schizophrenia Bulletin, signal a renewed interest in phenomenological approaches to our understanding of schizophrenia. These approaches conceptualize schizophrenia as a disorder of altered self-awareness and decreased prereflective social attunement, which may manifest as an impaired understanding of self, others, and the physical world. Phenomenological approaches to psychopathology are sometimes construed as being incompatible with the reductionistic methodology of contemporary neuroscience. In this article, we re-examine findings from the phenomenological investigation of schizophrenia in light of an influential neurocomputational account of mindreading, which postulates that understanding of others is subserved by coherent internal self-models. We argue that the phenomenological approach to schizophrenia is not incompatible with a neurocomputational account of mindreading, and that the 2 approaches should instead be viewed as existing in a relationship of mutual constraint and enlightenment. Our hypothesis, while speculative, is an attempt to marry the phenomenological and neuronal realities of schizophrenia. Furthermore, it has implications for psychotherapeutic interventions and future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbv035

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This process, sometimes called desubjectivation, weakens the basic sense of being present to oneself and makes experience lose its immediacy.

    “This process, sometimes called desubjectivation (or de-embodiment of subjectivity), weakens the basic sense of being present to oneself and makes experience lose its immediacy [2,3].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nour, M. M., & Barrera, A.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Nour, Matthew M.
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2015-04-05
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
1214-1219
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W1976096291
Cited by
10
References
75
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
schizophrenia, phenomenology of schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Humans, Schizophrenia, Self Concept, Social Perception, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review