Cited by 215Gut microbiota and healthColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionNutritional Studies and Diet

Race-dependent association of sulfidogenic bacteria with colorectal cancer

Open access
Yazici, Cemal, Wolf, Patricia G, Kim, Hajwa, Cross, Tzu-Wen L, Vermillion, Karin, Carroll, Timothy, Augustus, Gaius J, Mutlu, Ece +7 more·2017·Gut

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is higher in African Americans (AAs) compared with non-Hispanic whites (NHWs). A diet high in animal protein and fat is an environmental risk factor for CRC development. The intestinal microbiota is postulated to modulate the effects of diet in promoting or preventing CRC. Hydrogen sulfide, produced by autochthonous sulfidogenic bacteria, triggers proinflammatory pathways and hyperproliferation, and is genotoxic. We hypothesised that sulfidogenic bacterial abundance in colonic mucosa may be an environmental CRC risk factor that distinguishes AA and NHW. DESIGN: Colonic biopsies from uninvolved or healthy mucosa from CRC cases and tumour-free controls were collected prospectively from five medical centres in Chicago for association studies. Sulfidogenic bacterial abundance in uninvolved colonic mucosa of AA and NHW CRC cases was compared with normal mucosa of AA and NHW controls. In addition, 16S rDNA sequencing was performed in AA cases and controls. Correlations were examined among bacterial targets, race, disease status and dietary intake. RESULTS: was more abundant in AA cases than controls. Linear discriminant analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed five sulfidogenic genera that were more abundant in AA cases. Fat and protein intake and daily servings of meat were significantly higher in AAs compared with NHWs, and multiple dietary components correlated with a higher abundance of sulfidogenic bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: These results implicate sulfidogenic bacteria as a potential environmental risk factor contributing to CRC development in AAs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313321

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several sulfidogenic bacteria, including Fusobacterium, Bilophila wadsworthia, and genera Lactococcus, Porphyromonas, Odoribacter, Bilophila, and Pyramidobacter, are enriched in tissue samples from colorectal cancer patients.

    “Several sulfidogenic bacteria were found to be enriched in tissue samples from patients with CRC, including Fusobacterium, Bilophila wadsworthia, and the genera Lactococcus, Porphyromonas, Odoribacter, Bilophila, and Pyramidobacter.165, 166”
  • Sulfidogenic bacteria could help explain why African Americans have more colorectal cancer than Caucasians.

    “Sulfidogenic bacteria might therefore contribute to the higher incidence of CRC in African Americans than Caucasians.166”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yazici, C., Wolf, P. G., Kim, H., Cross, T.-W. L., Vermillion, K., Carroll, T., Augustus, G. J., Mutlu, E., Tussing-Humphreys, L., Braunschweig, C., Xicola, R. M., Jung, B., Llor, X., Ellis, N. A., & Gaskins, H. R.
Affiliations
  • Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Gaskins, H Rex
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-02-02
Volume
66
Issue
11
Pages
1983-1994
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2585923386
Cited by
215
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32dk007788-15, UL1TR001863)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA153060, R01CA141057, T32CA009213, R01CA204808, P30CA023074)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK-007788)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
colorectal cancer, sulfidogenic bacteria, racial disparities, African Americans, non-Hispanic whites, hydrogen sulfide, meat consumption, environmental risk factors, 16S rRNA gene sequencing
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Black or African American, Chicago, Colon, Diet, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Female, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Sulfur-Reducing Bacteria, White People, Health Status Disparities, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review