Cited by 279Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Research TopicsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Continuity and Change of Psychopathology From Childhood Into Adulthood: A 14-Year Follow-up Study

HOFSTRA, MARIJKE B., VAN der ENDE, JAN, VERHULST, FRANK C.·2000·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To test the 14-year continuity and change of behavioral and emotional problems from childhood into adulthood. Method For 1,615 children and adolescents aged 4 to 16 years from the general population, parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) at initial assessment. At follow-up 14 years later, subjects completed the Young Adult Self-Report (YASR), and their parents completed the Young Adult Behavior Checklist (YABCL). Results Of the subjects who were initially classified as deviant, 14 years later 41% were classified as deviant according to their YABCL Total Problem score, and 29% according to their YASR Total Problem score. Intrainformant (CBCL/YABCL) Withdrawn, Social Problems, Delinquent Behavior, and Aggressive Behavior scores, and cross-informant (CBCL/YASR) Anxious/Depressed, Thought Problems, and Delinquent Behavior scores were independent predictors of general levels of problem behavior. Conclusions Childhood and adolescent problems persisted to a considerable degree into adulthood, although the majority of children who were deviant at initial assessment could not be regarded as deviant 14 years later. Children who were adolescents at initial assessment (12-16 years) showed higher stability of problem behaviors than subjects who were children at initial assessment (4-11 years).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-200007000-00013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HOFSTRA, M. B., VAN der ENDE, J., & VERHULST, F. C.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital (NL)
Corresponding author
VERHULST, FRANK C.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-07
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
850-858
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087906757
Cited by
279
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Health Research and Development Council (002827230)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
childhood to adulthood transition, behavioral problems, emotional problems, delinquency, aggression, social problems, withdrawal, anxious/depressed symptoms, thought problems, developmental stability, Child Behavior Checklist
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Netherlands, Parents, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Social Behavior Disorders, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review