The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Traumatic Brain Injury in the Elderly: Increased Mortality and Worse Functional Outcome At Discharge Despite Lower Injury Severity
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare data obtained from a statewide data set for elderly patients (age > 64 years) that presented with traumatic brain injury with data from nonelderly patients (age > 15 and < 65 years) with similar injuries. METHODS: The New York State Trauma Registry from January 1994 through December 1995, from trauma centers and community hospitals excluding New York City (45,982 patients), was examined. Head-injured patients were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes. A relative head injury severity scale (RHISS) was constructed on the basis of groups of these codes (range, 0 = none to 3 = severe). Comparisons were made with nonelderly patients for mortality, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission and discharge, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, and RHISS. Outcome was assessed by a Functional Independence Measure score in three major domains: expression, locomotion, and feeding. Data were analyzed by the chi2 test and Mann-Whitney U test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: There were 11,772 patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis of head injury, of which 3,244 (27%) were elderly. There were more male subjects in the nonelderly population (78% male subjects) compared with the elderly population (50% men). Mortality was 24.0% in the elderly population compared with 12.8% in the nonelderly population (risk ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.99-2.43). The elderly nonsurvivors were statistically older, and mortality rate increased with age. Stratified by GCS score, there was a higher percentage of nonsurvivors in the elderly population, even in the group with only moderately depressed GCS score (GCS score of 13-15; risk ratio, 7.8; 95% confidence interval, 6.1-9.9 for elderly vs. nonelderly). Functional outcome in all three domains was significantly worse in the elderly survivors compared with the nonelderly survivors. CONCLUSION: Elderly traumatic brain injury patients have a worse mortality and functional outcome than nonelderly patients who present with head injury even though their head injury and overall injuries are seemingly less severe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dementia Risk After Traumatic Brain Injury vs Nonbrain Trauma: The Role of Age and Severity
Gardner, R. C., Burke, J. F., Nettiksimmons, J., Kaup, A., Barnes, D. E., & Yaffe, K. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.2668 · Cited by 451
Meningeal lymphatic dysfunction exacerbates traumatic brain injury pathogenesis.
Bolte, A. C., Dutta, A. B., Hurt, M. E., Smirnov, I., Kovacs, M. A., McKee, C. A., Ennerfelt, H. E., Shapiro, D., Nguyen, B. H., Frost, E. L., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18113-4 · Cited by 357
Ritzel, R. M., Doran, S. J., Glaser, E. P., Meadows, V. E., Faden, A. I., Stoica, B. A., & Loane, D. J. (2019) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.02.010 · Cited by 156
Unmet Service Needs of Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury
Pickelsimer, E. E., Selassie, A. W., Sample, P. L., W. Heinemann, A., Gu, J. K., & Veldheer, L. C. (2007) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00001199-200701000-00001 · Cited by 136
Oxidative stress in head trauma in aging
Shao, C., Roberts, K. N., Markesbery, W. R., Scheff, S. W., & Lovell, M. A. (2006) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.03.007 · Cited by 111
Traumatic Brain Injury in the Elderly: Is it as Bad as we Think?
Mak, C. H. K., Wong, S. K. H., Wong, G. K., Ng, S., Wang, K. K. W., Lam, P. K., & Poon, W. S. (2012) · Current Translational Geriatrics and Experimental Gerontology Reports · doi:10.1007/s13670-012-0017-2 · Cited by 91
Using Drosophila as an integrated model to study mild repetitive traumatic brain injury
Barekat, A., Gonzalez, A., Mauntz, R. E., Kotzebue, R. W., Molina, B., El-Mecharrafie, N., Conner, C. J., Garza, S., Melkani, G. C., Joiner, W. J., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep25252 · Cited by 87
Effect of aging on the microglial response to peripheral nerve injury
Conde, J. R., & Streit, W. J. (2006) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.07.012 · Cited by 86
Lee, P., Kim, J., Williams, R., Sandhir, R., Gregory, E., Brooks, W. M., & Berman, N. E. J. (2012) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.12.016 · Cited by 78
Is there a Sex Difference in the Course Following Traumatic Brain Injury?
Kirkness, C. J., Burr, R. L., Mitchell, P. H., & Newell, D. W. (2004) · Biological Research For Nursing · doi:10.1177/1099800404263050 · Cited by 72
Walsh, M., Fritz, S., Hake, D., Son, M., Greve, S., Jbara, M., Chitta, S., Fritz, B., Miller, A., K Bader, M., et al. (2016) · Current Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/1389450117666160310153211 · Cited by 58
Concomitant injuries and its influence on functional outcome after traumatic brain injury
Leong, B. K., Mazlan, M., Rahim, R. B. A., & Ganesan, D. (2013) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.748832 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Susman, M., DiRusso, S. M., Sullivan, T., Risucci, D., Nealon, P., Cuff, S., Haider, A., & Benzil, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-224
- ISSN
- 0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010944261
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.