Cited by 54Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Placebo EffectPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Heritability of pain catastrophizing and associations with experimental pain outcomes: a twin study

Open access
Trost, Zina, Strachan, Eric, Sullivan, Michael, Vervoort, Tine, Avery, Ally R., Afari, Niloofar·2015·Pain

Abstract

This study used a twin paradigm to examine genetic and environmental contributions to pain catastrophizing and the observed association between pain catastrophizing and cold-pressor task (CPT) outcomes. Male and female monozygotic (n = 206) and dizygotic twins (n = 194) from the University of Washington Twin Registry completed a measure of pain catastrophizing and performed a CPT challenge. As expected, pain catastrophizing emerged as a significant predictor of several CPT outcomes, including cold-pressor Immersion Tolerance, Pain Tolerance, and Delayed Pain Rating. The heritability estimate for pain catastrophizing was found to be 37% with the remaining 63% of variance attributable to unique environmental influence. Additionally, the observed associations between pain catastrophizing and CPT outcomes were not found attributable to shared genetics or environmental exposure, which suggests a direct relationship between catastrophizing and experimental pain outcomes. This study is the first to examine the heritability of pain catastrophizing and potential processes by which pain catastrophizing is related to experimental pain response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460326.02891.fc

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-efficacy determines thoughts, feelings, and behaviors in stressful situations and affects one's ability to cope successfully with challenges.

    “Self-efficacy, or an individual’s belief in his ability to perform a behavior or achieve a desired outcome 26, 273, determines thoughts, feelings, and behaviors in stressful situations and affects one’s ability to cope successfully when confronted with challenges 367, 368.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Sullivan MJL Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain The Clinical journal of pain 2001 17 1 52 64 11289089
  2. [51]Sullivan MJ Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain Clin J Pain 2001 17 1 52 64 11289089

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trost, Z., Strachan, E., Sullivan, M., Vervoort, T., Avery, A. R., & Afari, N.
Affiliations
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Afari, Niloofar
Venue
Pain
Published
2015-03
Volume
156
Issue
3
Pages
514-520
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080320463
Cited by
54
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Washington
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RC2HL103416)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK082325, U01DK082316)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
pain catastrophizing, heritability, genetic factors, environmental influences, monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, cold pressor task, pain tolerance, experimental pain, twin studies
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cold Temperature, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Twins, Zygote, Pain Threshold, Young Adult, Catastrophization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review