Cited by 15Sleep and related disordersMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Clinically Important Change in Insomnia Severity After Chronic Pain Rehabilitation

Wilson, Keith G., Kowal, John, Ferguson, Emma J.·2016·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Objectives: Insomnia is a common problem for people with chronic pain. It is unclear, however, whether interdisciplinary treatment centered on pain management, rather than sleep, confers a benefit in reducing insomnia symptoms. In this study, we examined clinically important change in insomnia severity following participation in an interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program. Methods: A total of 140 patients (43 men and 97 women) completed a 4-week outpatient day program for interdisciplinary rehabilitation that incorporated psychoeducation about pain, physical fitness, and group psychotherapy. The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was included as an outcome, along with measures of pain, mood, and function. Results: On the ISI before treatment, 20 patients (14.3%) reported no insomnia, 36 (25.7%) had a mild or subthreshold problem, and 84 (60%) had moderate (31.4%) or severe (28.6%) clinical insomnia. After treatment, ISI scores showed a statistically significant improvement overall (P<0.001). Six indices of individual change were examined among those with moderate-severe insomnia at baseline. Depending on the index used, rates of clinically important improvement ranged from 2.4% to 47.6%; however, only 2 patients with insomnia met criteria for full remission. Among patients with no or subthreshold symptoms at baseline, from 0% to 14.3% were worse after treatment, depending on the criterion. Discussion: Insomnia improves overall following interdisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic pain, but most patients with clinical insomnia continue to have a significant sleep problem after treatment, and some patients may get worse. Interventions to alleviate persistent insomnia comorbid with chronic pain are likely to require a more intensive focus on sleep itself.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000325

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, K. G., Kowal, J., & Ferguson, E. J.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Wilson, Keith G.
  • Kowal, John
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2016-09
Volume
32
Issue
9
Pages
784-791
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331674575
Cited by
15
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
insomnia, chronic pain, interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation, Insomnia Severity Index, clinically important change, pain management, psychoeducation, group therapy, sleep disorders, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Psychotherapy, Group, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review