Cited by 256Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia in patients with chronic pain

Open access
Jungquist, Carla R., O’Brien, Chris, Matteson-Rusby, Sara, Smith, Michael T., Pigeon, Wilfred R., Xia, Yinglin, Lu, Naiji, Perlis, Michael L.·2010·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Study objectives To assess the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) in patients with non-malignant chronic pain.Methods Twenty-eight subjects with chronic neck and back pain were stratified according to gender, age, and ethnicity, then assigned to one of the two treatment groups: CBT-I or a contact control condition.Intervention Eight weeks of CBT-I including sleep restriction, stimulus control, sleep hygiene, and one session of cognitive therapy devoted to catastrophic thoughts about the consequences of insomnia.Measurements and results Outcomes included sleep diary assessments of sleep continuity, pre-post measures of insomnia severity (ISI), pain (Multidimensional Pain Inventory), and mood (BDI and POMS). Subjects receiving CBT-I (n=19), as compared to control subjects (n=9), exhibited significant decreases in sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, number of awakenings, and significant increase in sleep efficiency. The diary findings were paralleled by significant changes in the ISI (p=0.05). Significant improvement (p=0.03) was found on the Interference Scale of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory. The groups did not significantly differ on mood measures or measures of pain severity.Conclusions CBT-I was successfully applied to patients experiencing chronic pain. Significant improvements were found in sleep as well as in the extent to which pain interfered with daily functioning. The observed effect sizes for the sleep outcomes appear comparable to or better than meta-analytic norms for subjects with Primary Insomnia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2009.05.018

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RCTs of CBT-I only, with no medication comparator, generally find treatment is as efficacious in those with comorbid disorders as in those with primary insomnia.

    “RCTs of CBT-I only, with no medication comparator condition, generally find that treatment is as efficacious in those with comorbid disorders compared to those with primary insomnia (for example see [38]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jungquist, C. R., O’Brien, C., Matteson-Rusby, S., Smith, M. T., Pigeon, W. R., Xia, Y., Lu, N., & Perlis, M. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
302-309
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101759370
Cited by
256
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 21
FWCI
20.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (L30 MH087269)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NR5R21NR009080-02., R21NR009080)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, chronic pain, insomnia, neck pain, back pain, sleep restriction, stimulus control, sleep hygiene, catastrophic thinking, pain interference, sleep efficiency, mood
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review