The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of Shortened Versions of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The TSK-11 has been validated for use in patients after ACL reconstruction.
“The TSK-11 has been validated for use in patients after ACLR (George et al., 2012).”
From The relationship between psychological readiness to return to sport and kinesiophobia in teens and young adults after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (2025) · cites this paper as George et al., 2012
The Methods (page unavailable) describe the TSK-11 as a previously validated questionnaire used to assess patients after ACL reconstruction, and the Discussion reports associations with function in later rehabilitation. But the Introduction cautions that prior TSK validation studies may not apply directly to these patients; this study examines shortened versions rather than establishing that the full TSK-11 has been validated for this population. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: Current state of scientific evidence
Leeuw, M., Goossens, M. E. J. B., Linton, S. J., Crombez, G., Boersma, K., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9085-0 · Cited by 2,261
Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures.
Jensen, M. P., Turner, J. A., Romano, J. M., & Fisher, L. D. (1999) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00101-3 · Cited by 1,247 · cited 2×
“These 3 conditions were also summed and then the mean of the 3 conditions was reported as the “composite” pain intensity.(14) Knee function was assessed with the 18-item International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form.”
Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: A shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia
Woby, S. R., Roach, N. K., Urmston, M., & Watson, P. J. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.029 · Cited by 923 · cited 1×
“The TSK-11 is an 11-item questionnaire that eliminates psychometrically poor items from the original version of the TSK to create a shorter questionnaire that is comparable to the original 17-item version.(11) Items on the TSK-11 are scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).”
Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Osman, A., Barrios, F. X., Kopper, B. A., Hauptmann, W., Jones, J., & O'Neill, E. (1997) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1023/a:1025570508954 · Cited by 881
Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., Bijttebier, P., Goubert, L., & Van Houdenhove, B. (2002) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00463-8 · Cited by 579
Catastrophizing: a risk factor for postsurgical pain
Pavlin, D. J., Sullivan, M. J. L., Freund, P. R., & Roesen, K. (2005) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200501000-00010 · Cited by 326
Meyer, K., Sprott, H., & Mannion, A. F. (2008) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.12.004 · Cited by 319
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Chmielewski, 2008, The association of pain and fear of movementreinjury with function during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation., J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 38, 746, 10.2519/jospt.2008.2887 · DOI
- Kvist, 2005, Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction., Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 13, 393, 10.1007/s00167-004-0591-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Tripp, 2003, Comparing postoperative pain experiences of the adolescent and adult athlete after anterior cruciate ligament surgery., J Athl Train, 38, 154
- Brewer, 2007, Pain and negative mood during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a daily process analysis., Scand J Med Sci Sports, 17, 520, 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00601.x · DOI
- Ardern, 2011, Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play., Br J Sports Med, 45, 596, 10.1136/bjsm.2010.076364 · DOI · Paper page
- Burwinkle, 2005, Fear of movement: factor structure of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome., J Pain, 6, 384, 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.355 · DOI
- Mann, 2007, A survey of sports medicine physicians regarding psychological issues in patient-athletes., Am J Sports Med, 35, 2140, 10.1177/0363546507304140 · DOI
- Wilk, 2003, Recent advances in the rehabilitation of isolated and combined anterior cruciate ligament injuries., Orthop Clin North Am, 34, 107, 10.1016/S0030-5898(02)00064-0 · DOI
- Sullivan, 1995, The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation., Psychol Assess, 7, 524, 10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524 · DOI · Paper page
- Irrgang, 2001, Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form., Am J Sports Med, 29, 600, 10.1177/03635465010290051301 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, 2006, The International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation form: normative data., Am J Sports Med, 34, 128, 10.1177/0363546505280214 · DOI
- Irrgang, 2006, Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form., Am J Sports Med, 34, 1567, 10.1177/0363546506288855 · DOI
- Kerns, 1995, Pain-relevant responses from significant others: development of a significant-other version of the WHYMPI scales., Pain, 61, 245, 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00173-C · DOI
- Waddell, 1993, A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability., Pain, 52, 157, 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-B · DOI · Paper page
- Chibnall, 2005, Confirmatory factor analysis of the pain catastrophizing scale in African American and Caucasian Workers Compensation claimants with low back injuries., Pain, 113, 369, 10.1016/j.pain.2004.11.016 · DOI
- Roelofs, 2007, Fear of movement and (re)injury in chronic musculoskeletal pain: evidence for an invariant two-factor model of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia across pain diagnoses and Dutch, Swedish, and Canadian samples., Pain, 131, 181, 10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Goubert, 2004, Confirmatory factor analysis of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: invariant two-factor model across low back pain patients and fibromyalgia patients., Clin J Pain, 20, 103, 10.1097/00002508-200403000-00007 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Luque-Suarez, A., Martinez-Calderon, J., & Falla, D. (2019) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-098673 · Cited by 546
Truong, L. K., Mosewich, A. D., Holt, C. J., Le, C. Y., Miciak, M., & Whittaker, J. L. (2020) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2019-101206 · Cited by 205
Shen, B., Wu, B., Abdullah, T. B., Zhan, G., Lian, Q., Vania Apkarian, A., & Huang, L. (2018) · Molecular Pain · doi:10.1177/1744806918755283 · Cited by 44
“Factor structure analysis of SC-PCS Other investigators have raised concerns regarding the stability of a three-factor PCS.49 Numerous studies have demonstrated a similar decomposition of the PCS into a two-factorial model.2,8,22 Furthermore, in the child version for PCS adaptation, only one factor was found in a Germ…”
BackgroundInfluentialButler, L., Baez, S., Walker, C., Roman, D., Douthit, T., Kuenze, C., Ulman, S., & ARROW (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1623398 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- George, S. Z., Lentz, T. A., Zeppieri, G., Lee, D., & Chmielewski, T. L.
- Venue
- The Clinical Journal of Pain
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-80
- ISSN
- 0749-8047
- PMC
- PMC3703641
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
